Slashdot Mirror


S Korea & China Mandate Common Chargers, Data Cables

mrbill writes "Seems that South Korea and China have mandated Common Cell Phone chargers and data cables. No proprietary chargers and data cables any more. Must use USB for charging etc. "

27 of 362 comments (clear)

  1. Mandate by Tekoneiric · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This should happen all over. I wonder how much electronic waste is from cables and wall warts?

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    1. Re:Mandate by hal9035 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't that the point of USB? What's the "U" stand for, anyway? Since all things come from China.....

    2. Re:Mandate by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder how much electronic waste is from cables and wall warts?

      How will those poor struggling phone manufacturers will make a living if they can't sell an adapter for $39.99?

      And imagine the shock of...having everyone connect their phone upto their PC via USB without buying some proprietary hookup? (and having to re-buy that hookup every time someone upgrades the phone?). That's a lot of $$$!

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:Mandate by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Definitely! Or, at least, things would be better if electronic devices standardized on a small (5) subset of voltage requirements.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    4. Re:Mandate by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a totally awesome idea, except it's also stupid as hell.

      I've wanted manufacturers to standardize on USB for a few years now. It would truly be wonderful, as many of you have been happy to point out. But what happens when something better comes along? What happens when someone has a great idea, but finds out he can't legally implement it?

      I don't know what that idea may be. It could be the ability to safely and seamlessly hop amperage and voltage to much higher levels based on communication between power-only hubs and devices. It may be an even better connection. It may be much faster data that requires two more wires. I really don't know.

      If it was an industry association mandating the standard, it would be different. Mavericks with good ideas could at least go it alone and see if anyone bites. Industry giants reading good press about the new connection could push for a change and get it.. That actually happens in the marketplace, but governments don't even come close to moving that quickly. If the law prevents people from getting a new idea to market until the law is changed, or government bureaucracy grinds along, it'll put a big damper on innovation.

      Once again, I like USB and I would love all my portable devices to be recharged by it, but once you make differences illegal, you end up paying a heavy price. We shouldn't celebrate a great idea at the moment if it means we'll pay dearly down the road.

      TW

    5. Re:Mandate by Danga · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've wanted manufacturers to standardize on USB for a few years now. It would truly be wonderful, as many of you have been happy to point out. But what happens when something better comes along? What happens when someone has a great idea, but finds out he can't legally implement it?

      Well they could release the product with the standard cable and then sell the new, improved cable as an additional purchase. If the new cable is actually better then people will pay the extra money to get it and it probably would eventually become the new standard.

      Standards can be updated you know and while it may be a hassle I think it would be worth it in this case where such a huge amount of waste is produced.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    6. Re:Mandate by mandelbr0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know what that idea may be. It could be the ability to safely and seamlessly hop amperage and voltage to much higher levels based on communication between power-only hubs and devices. It may be an even better connection. It may be much faster data that requires two more wires. I really don't know.

      This makes absolutely no sense. According to your argument, we should never standardize anything, because it might screw up someone's future idea. There are no features at this point in time that require a change to the already existing USB standard to make mobile phones work. They will charge in a certain amount of time via the powered line. They will transfer data at a certain rate because that's how USB works. I'd rather have a standard connector available that works in a known way right now than worrying about what the future will bring. Imagine what your house would be like if electricity never had any standards set. You'd have to make sure that the wall socket the electrician installed and the power cable for the new device you bought were compatible. In addition to different wattage of power supplies, they'd also run on dozens of different voltages. But, we can take it for granted. No one discovered something later on that overturned all of the standards we'd decided on for electricity. Are you seriously suggesting that USB is such an immature technology that the connectors and cables we already use are subject to change?

      Note that some changes to the technology (such as your additional wires example) are not precluded. Remember 80-pin IDE cables? Increased transfer rates on additional wires without changing the motherboard's interface. There's only one reason to have no standards on data/power cables for electronic devices, and that's to sell the high-margin accessories. The data cable for my phone is stupid: it's a USB cable with a proprietary connection to the phone. As a result, the data transfer rate is only 115200 BPS instead of the 400+ Kbps of USB2. RS232 over USB -- how pointless.

      mandelbr0t

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    7. Re:Mandate by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think standardization is great. It's more than great. It allows things like CDs, gasoline and soda vending machines to work. I wouldn't have it any other way. But notice that none of the above is mandated by law.

      If I prefer to make a device that uses floppy disks or DVDs for data transfer, no one is going to stop me. Despite the fact that the industry standardizes on cans of about the same size, manufactures felt plenty free to start making plastic bottles. Nothing in America says I have to use a gasoline powered car. If I want to use natural gas or electric, it's no problem.

      I'm not against standardization. I'm against laws that enforce standardization. Industries should come together and standardize on a format. If they don't, consumers suffer, but that shouldn't be an excuse to force them.

      As you point out, something standardized by the government is AC outlets. They haven't changed in how many years? Is it honestly the best outlet that could possibly be made? Is it possible we could have safer, flatter, more portable plugs if not for the prongs? We probably wont know for many years to come, if ever. Maybe 220 would be superior, like in Europe? But you don't have the option of having your house equipped with European-style outlets. If you want 220, you have to go with American-style appliance outlets. Do you want to have smart conductive plates that communicate with whatever you place against them and give just the right amount of juice making wall warts a thing of the past? And they don't fry your toddler who discovered the butter knife? Can't have it. Are their better ideas than the off-the-cuff examples I just gave? Almost certainly, but who would spend the time developing them knowing the legal hurdles they'd have to jump to even start up a small commercial operation.

      Is this a huge problem. Probably not, but we'll never know what we may have missed out on. Innovation is how I make my living in IT, and how I enjoy my very cool toys. Standardization is totally, totally awesome, but I would not give up innovation to get it.

      TW

    8. Re:Mandate by Moonwick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, he's pointing out that there's a difference between standards and laws.

      --
      Only on slashdot can a posting be rated "Score -1, Insightful".
  2. Hooray!!!! by waterford0069 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'nuff said

  3. Way to go! by Argon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate it the way the same vendor changes connectors for different phones. Nokia gets the credit for using the same connector for all it's phones.

    1. Re:Way to go! by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They GOT credit you mean. Utopia is is not more - they now use a thinner and completely incompatible plug in several of their phones. I decided - no more Nokia. This is the very reason I've bought Nokia for a long time.

    2. Re:Way to go! by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know what you're talking about. I've had Nokia phones over the last ten years with at least six different connectors for data cables and handsfree systems (21xx series - eg 2190, 61xx series - eg 6185, 9000, 9290, 3220 (actually my wife's), and 6010 (that bizarre 1.8mm handsfree jack.) Even counting just the last five years (6185, 9290, 3220, and 6010), that's four completely different connectors. In terms of current model range, I believe there are phones covering three different, incompatible, connectors.

      And to make matters worse, while the phones above may electrically have had similar connectors within their product families (that is, the 6150 had the same pins as the 6185), data cables frequently for one frequently weren't compatible with other models.

      Nokia also gets a thumbs down for eschewing the 2.5mm jack for handsfree kits.

      Nokia is by far the worst offender. Most Motorola, for example, phones made in the last five years have the same connector for data and power (or, recently, mini-USB - even better), and have proper 2.5mm handsfree jacks.

      Gah.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  4. FINALLY by xtal · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have been waiting for this for a long time. This is one case where the sheer insanity of having 12 different chargers makes some sense for a legislated standard. It's unfortunate the industry couldn't play nice enough to not require it, but at the same time, it's NEEDED here.

    You'd be pretty pissed if you could only use a GM-approved fill neck for your car. Why is your phone any different?

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:FINALLY by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's inconvenient for people, but they *can* deal with it.
      But why should they?
    2. Re:FINALLY by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have been waiting for this for a long time. This is one case where the sheer insanity of having 12 different chargers makes some sense for a legislated standard.

      If it is sheer insanity and it is self inflicted.

      Speaking for the U.S. (I know a lot of other countries are represented on slashdot with different laws and fundamental principles) this is a market issue. We don't have to buy cell phones. We don't have to buy phones with proprietary adapters. We do because it isn't that big of a deal. Yes, it's wasteful. Americans always have been. Yes it's annoying. Americans don't (or didn't) expect legislation to prevent annoying corporate habits.

      We have too many laws in this country as it is. We also have too many real problems as it is. I'm all for government mandates around information like a warning label that says this is a proprietary cable and only works with your Treo 650. Mandating convenience for the american public is NOT the american way. It never was.

      You'd be pretty pissed if you could only use a GM-approved fill neck for your car.

      No, I would laugh and buy someone else's car. I was very interested in the VW Turbo Diesel but knowing I couldn't get diesel fuel at every gas station made me look elsewhere. I didn't call for a government mandate requiring all cars to use the same fuel or for gas stations to sell all types of fuel.

      Why is your phone any different?

      Why should my cell phone be any different indeed.
  5. Don't get too excited just yet.... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .... as there is a ton of money to be made in after market accessories (see the iPod for a great example). It would take a lot of balls for cell phone companies (for example) not to do this in places where these mandates don't exist and cut off the income stream of their accessory companies. So consumers in places where these mandates don't exist still have to "vote with their dollars" as it were to encourage manufacturers to make it happen.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  6. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "However, always beware the law of unintended consequences. It seems likely to me that the costs for this will be passed on to us, one way or another."

    I disagree. Costs will go WAY down. Instead of paying high prices for proprietary, hard-to-find cables, we'll be able to cruise into Wal-Martz and ask for a "cell phone cable." "That'll be five dollars, please."

    "The mobile manufacturers aren't just going to redesign and retool for free."

    One might think that they're already redesigning and retooling with *every* new phone, given that they all have different cables?

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
  7. seconded! by cyclomedia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now in europe please, oh and make sure they're all able to charge off of a sensible range of voltage and current and more importantly use the SAME USB socket, because let's face it there are twelve of those two.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  8. USB? by gelfling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WTF does that mean? I have an iPod aftermarket charger that plugs into the wall and accepts the iPod's standard USB cable. Is that what they mean? Because at the least that would mean I could use a cheap wallplug unit for all my phone regardless of what stupid unique connector they use on the phone end. Of course that means that USB cables will triple in price.

    Otherwise if they mean that all phones have to be charged by a USB port to a computer alone that would make less than zero sense. Considering, as others here have pointed out, not all USB ports draw enough current, it doubly makes less than zero sense.

  9. Re:Mostly good news for consumers by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead (..-) we'll be able to cruise into Wal-Martz and ask for a "cell phone cable." "That'll be five dollars, please."

    Most certainly. But there's definately printer & ink, razor & blades etc. pricing going on here, where they offer you a subsidized price they'll recover through accessories. If they can't count on profits later they need profits now, so expect phone prices to rise. But mostly it's cutthroat on the main item and recovery on all sorts of extras ("extended warranty" anyone?) so it's probably an improvement.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  10. Re:But the FREE MARKET! by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the FREE MARKET

          Oligopolies are not "free market". The current situation produces the best result for the manufacturer :)

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  11. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You pay through the nose for the non-standard charger when you have to replace it in a few years, generally between 30 and 50 dollars for a part with a materials cost of at most a dollar.

    You pay for it in phones that get thrown out because the non-standard charger tax in a few years makes it more feasable to dump the phone than replace the hideously unstandard wall-wart. Hence, more landfill costs, more materials costs, and a depressed to non-existant secondary market.

    You pay for it in electricity, in the trickle costs of the many, many different chargers plugged in but idle in any given household.

    You pay for it in brainspace, trying to keep everything clear in your head. Those times you fail to take the proper charger with you on a trip and you have to buy another one when you get there.

    And on the other end of the spectrum, all of this is because the hardware companies want to bury hidden costs in the device to make a higher profit. There is no benefit to the end consumer at all. The manufacturers are just trying to raise the barrier of entry of selling replacement parts to keep those prices artifically high.

    Well, guess what? The consumer does have a voice in making things fair. It's called the government. That's why you elect them. It doesn't always work, but that's what it's for. And in this case, the free market has had years to fix the problem, and it has only gotten worse. The amount of cheering on this thread is evidence of the animosity towards this purely profit-taking process.

    This is people, seeing a problem and taking an action to improve the end-consumer experience and reduce overall costs. And good for them. It's nice to see a government that isn't kow-towing to every exploitive commercial process within its borders.

  12. Re:Let the free market decide this one by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The free market has failed us for twenty years on this one. The free market says: buy a proprietary cable, or don't buy at all.

    The free market dictates that nothing works together, so that the businesses maximize profit. This is an automatic collusion. Smith said that no two businessmen ever met that didn't immediately collude to fix their market; he might have added that some markets require no actual collusion, that some exploitation is just obvious.

    This is one of the reasons we have governments. It's also why we don't have dozens of different power companies and dozens of power connectors in our home.

    Present businesses have failed us, so now some other nation's government will step in and impose some order, as we are ideologically incapable. Profits will diminish for the manufacturers, but spending power will increase for the consumer, the Broken Window fallacy refuted.

  13. Wagging the dog by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the second example, but certainly not the last, where China has set a defacto standard for us. Here's what they did with DVD formats.

    When a country owns all your manufacturing capacity, you can't really tell them no. Who else is going to make stuff for you? Plus we owe them billions on the trade deficit.

    And this is only the warm up act. DVD formats and cables, little stuff. Wait until we start rolling over on the big stuff! ROFL! Maybe we'll wake up to obvious one of these days.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  14. Can we get them to work on laptops, next? by Chris.Nelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have 4 laptops and, I think, 7 types of laptop chargers in our household. Wouldn't it be nice if the laptop chargers were all the same?

  15. Re:Because they don't care enough to pay by berashith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would agree with this if I got a free car charger also. Every time I buy a phone, I have to spend the extra $30 - $50 for this accessory.

    Getting extra batteries to charge during the occasions that I am home would be an option I guess, but those are even more non-standard and expensive.

    My last option is just suck it up and stay locked in to a single vendor, until that vendor decides to again change all the charger ports, no matter how inferior the product becomes.

    Creating a standard pin and having a built in cost of a few pennies per phone seems to be the best option on the table.