Slashdot Mirror


Discovery Lands in Florida

duh P3rf3ss3r writes "As reported by the BBC, the space shuttle Discovery safely landed at Kennedy Space Center in Florida at 2232 GMT. Discovery's 13-day mission is being called a success after astronauts undertook four space walks to install new wiring and to do battle with a recalcitrant solar panel. The next scheduled flight is the Atlantis shuttle in March. A video chronicle of the mission, including the landing, is available at NASA's video gallery."

12 of 83 comments (clear)

  1. You can by chanrobi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:You can by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uh, what... Time to switch to a more modern Shuttle sim perhaps? ;-)

      Orbiter (more info and screens)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:You can by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know a game is pitched at geeks when the front page shouts in large letters: "Now with improved dynamic state propagation!"

      Zounds! I didn't know what I was missing!

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  2. Fuglesang! by Nevtje(hr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Välkommen hem!

    First swedish astronaut ever. I'm so proud!

    Even cooler is the fact that he is funny (not some deeply overserious physics guy)- I very much enjoyed the interview with him from ISS.

    --
    Three rings for the Elven-kings in the sky
  3. Why bbc? by wik · · Score: 3, Informative

    Of all news sources, why the random BBC link? Why not link to the shuttle website?

    --
    / \
    \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
    x
    / \
  4. Re:One question by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's currently planned for STS-125, which won't happen earlier than May 2008.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  5. Re:ugh by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry - you didn't miss anything ... the Florida voters did a recount and it turns out that Discovery actually landed in Maryland.

  6. White Sands is a last resort by amightywind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some people will find the negative in anything. Nothing wrong with a safe, routine KSC landing. For the record the shuttle has an 1100 mile cross range. It was in a highly inclined orbit, so its landing opportunities were limited. Also there are only a handful of runways in the entire world that can handle it, none of which are equiped with crane needed to place the orbiter on top of the carrier aircraft. A White Sands landing would have added 2 months to Discovery's turnaround for the next launch. If you really want to see a shuttle landing at White Sands, dig up the video from STS 3.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  7. Re:Too bad they didn't land at White Sands by wwphx · · Score: 3, Informative

    We were hoping for a White Sands landing as it is 30 miles away from our house. I didn't know that it had previously landed there until early this year I was spending time at the White Sands Missile Range museum. Apparently the sand on the runway did quite a number on the brakes.

    I think it might have landed here once while being flown from California on the back of its 747, but I'm not certain.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  8. Only 14 More Flights! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For all you space fans out there, I suggest you make an effort to watch these shuttle launches, landings, and ISS construction missions when they happen. There are only 14 more space shuttle flights planned before retirement of the entire fleet in early 2010. All except one (the Hubble Telescope repair mission) will be construcing and resupplying the space station.

    Spaceflightnow.com has a nice manifest of future flights (see link below). Number 3 on the manifest just finished.

    http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts116/fdf/manif est.html

    Yes the shuttles have enormous problems (huge costs and long turnaround times, for example), but they are really the most versatile and capable spacecraft ever sent into orbit. After the shuttles are retired, we'll be going back to Apollo-style craft for the foreseeable decades. I for one am glad my child is old enough to be able to see and remember these shuttles flying in their final years.

  9. Re:Heard the sonic boom.. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 3, Informative

    length of the orbiter (the longest supersonic vehicle there is, with the demise of the Concorde)

    I believe that honor goes to the B-1B. According to Wikipedia, the STS orbiter is 122 feet long, while the B-1B is 137 feet.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  10. Re:Another Safe Landing by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Normally they aren't that interesting to me, either. But this is different.
    You see, after the Discovery had launched and was in space, it was discovered that something had hit the wing and maybe damaged some wiring. When I heard about that, I was afraid then that we might get another Columbia incident.
    They set a record on spacewalks this mission because they had to take an extra spacewalk to fix that wing.
    And then, this shuttle landed on the very last day it could have safely landed. There was bad weather in Calif. and bad weather in Florida continually up to that day. If it had tried to land through bad weather, it risked crashing. If it had stayed up another day, it would have ran out of fuel and become a very large piece of space junk. So the people in charge of landing this shuttle took a gamble.
    So yes, the Discovery landing safely, in one piece, and with everyone onboard alive is news. Excellent news, but news nonetheless.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney