Flying To the US? Pay In Cash
pin_gween writes to point us to a report in the Telegraph that British travelers using a credit card to purchase their ticket may now have their credit card and email accounts inspected by US authorities. This has been true since October, when the US and the EU agreed about what information the US could demand from airlines and how this information would be handled. But details of the agreement only recently came to light following a Freedom of Information request. The US says it will "encourage" US carriers to reciprocate to any requests by European governments. From the article: "[T]he Americans are entitled to 34 separate pieces of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data... Initially, such material could be inspected for seven days but a reduced number of US officials could view it for three and a half years. Should any record be inspected during this period, the file could remain open for eight years...'It is pretty horrendous, particularly when you couple it with our one-sided extradition arrangements with the US,' said [a human rights activist]. 'It is making the act of buying a ticket a gateway to a host of personal email and financial information. While there are safeguards, it appears you would have to go to a US court to assert your rights.'"
Some airlines only allow you to do Online Check-in by confirming your identity with your credit card number.
Some express-check-in's require you to either insert your credit card to get your boarding pass printed (or your frequent flyer card).
If I want better fares by booking online I will have to use a credit card too, not seen any airlines accept Paypal etc...
In short it seems that to take advantage of any fast-track system that saves on man-power and hassle for both the customer or airline I now have to give up my life's credit history.
Glum.
Instead of paying cash, fly to Canada or Mexico and then take a ground route into the US...
Looks as though the EU will have similar access on US citizens. The entire world is descending into fascist utopia created by government think tanks and multinationals.
I could be wrong ...
But I thought the standard logic in Police States (we can argue whether the US is a Police state another time) was that if you were unwilling to lose your privacy you must have something to hide. Hypothetically speaking, if you (heaven forbid) were a minority which could perhaps be from a Terrorism supporting country and you payed by cash wouldn't that ensure that you got the long trip through security?
sounds like they are trying to be informed about 'bob the nutcase who wants to kill you becuase you are different' before he hits the u.s. soil.
always mosh clockwise
I don't know where you're from, but I think you should add my country, the UK, to that list. It's only when people stop coming to these shores due to overly restrictive laws will our government realise the real damage that it's doing to this country. We have to hit them where it hurts: in the pocket.
If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
The ATnT NSA spying case shows all email is monitored anyway and ATnT will cooperate for their own benefit. It isn't just the emails of the passengers that is captured, everyone's is and they filter for anyone they care to.4 0225
l ikidis-Bugging22aug06.htm
4 56220
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/29/0
The Vodaphone Greece spying case shows that mobile phones can be tapped with simple software at the switch.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6182647.stm
http://www.mindfully.org/Technology/2006/Bove-Tsa
The recent FBI case shows the mobile phone is a microphone that can be turned on at any time, it means they don't just monitor telephone calls, but all conversations. The greek spying case was probably much bigger than announced, and may well have been more than just telephone calls.
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/04/0
The SWIFT case shows that any large corporation will hand over any information is it is threatened in any single market. That means that SWIFT may be handing information over to the Russians, but we would never know unless it leaked out.
(EU condemns swift spying)
http://cryptome.org/eu-swift-hit.htm
"Go look up the term "fascist.""
Ok. Here's the wikipedia description: "the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: authoritarianism, nationalism, militarism, corporatism, anti-liberalism, and anti-communism."
You were saying?
"we were part of the solution the last time such REAL nasty people took over Europe"
Most of the solution the last time were the Soviet communists under Stalin. Does that make the communists 'good', or that Europe should ignore the rest of what Stalin did?
The sad thing is that it'll be hard to find someone to free the Americans when they need help getting liberated.
If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
Nothing is going to be "inspected" by US authorities, and if anything is "inspected", it's not at-will and not arbitrary.
It's already inspected arbitrarily. The Patriot Act, and several later court decisions gives the US government the ability to read anyone's email at will. It would be nice if other governments did not help themselves in the same way, but they do. Princess Dianna's cell phone was tapped by the CIA ten years ago, do you really think your email is private? The criteria of inspection is as arbitrary as politics will always be - a decision is made based on someone's OPINION of what is dangerous. That opinion can be coded or forced onto clerks who get to do the dirty work themselves or by reviewing what carnivore spits out.
All of the above is unconstitutional, illegal and immoral but ongoing. The US has given up the Bill of Rights for it's own citizens, and cares even less about others. It is violating the private papers, homes and conversations of it's citizens. It has curtailed the right to bear arms. It has launched religious based policies but thwarted legitimate religious expression. It has censored the New York Times, created agencies to flood the news with disinformation and thereby shown itself an enemy of truth itself. It has imprisoned and tortured it's own citizens, which shows the regard it really has.
In spite of all that, you think the demand for information is harmless?
Even if you have the proverbial, "nothing to hide," you need to think twice before you give over those who might. You benefit from the efforts of those who "leak" the truth and do other things the current government might not like. As the Irqui insurgence shows, no real security is gained by all of these repressive measures. Peace and security only comes through respect and justice.
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
Thai New Year's Eve celebrants in Bangkok
Speculate much, do you?
Prime Minister Surayud Chula-nont said yesterday that supporters of Thailand's toppled regime rather than Muslim insurgents were likely behind bombings in the capital that killed three people and ruined New Year's Eve festivities for thousands of revelers.
If we were to become entirely dependent on outside food sources, you'd see the same problems with food that we see with oil today. You want Mexico or Brazil to have that kind of control over us?
This is exactly what is happening in Mexico, and why we have so many "illegal immigrants" trying to get into the US. Because of farm subsidies to big agrobusinesses in the US and NAFTA, they are able to ship and sale food to Mexico cheaper than Mexican farmers can grow it. This drives Mexican farmers off their farms and into Mexican cites as well as north to the US. Then those who go into Mexican cites drive others north as well.
FalconShould there be a Law?