The Debate Over Advertising on Wikipedia
An anonymous reader writes "Some Wikipedians have objected to Virgin Unite's participation in the Wikimedia Foundation's fund drive, calling it adverising. But there's a strong case that Wikipedia should run advertising. The funds raised could support dozens of Firefox-scale free knowledge and free software projects, outspending all but the wealthiest foundations."
Could someone explain the reasons for *not* having ads on Wikipedia?
A simple google ad doesnt do any harm. (or is there something I'm missing?)