Slashdot Mirror


Cringely's 2006 Results, 2007 Predictions

Underpants writes "Bob Cringely posts the results of his 2006 predictions (only 69% successful, so Bob is sad). He also lists his calls for 2007; none are particularly shocking, but some are at least interesting. 2007 predictions from the article: '4) No one DRM technology emerges as the winner and the RIAA begins to back off as it loses a few legal cases. Still, no Internet-only song wins a Grammy or is even recognized as existing. 9) Zune 2.0 appears, isn't brown, but still nobody buys it. 10) The year the net crashed (in the USA). Video overwhelms the net and we all learn that the broadband ISPs have been selling us something they can't really deliver.'"

44 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Question for 2007: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will Vista be the Zune of operating systems?

    1. Re:Question for 2007: by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why? because it's brown or because it's expensive?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Question for 2007: by gkhan1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seeing as it's gonna come preinstalled on pretty much every new computer sold in the next year, I doubt it. There's gonna be dozens (if not hundreds) of millions of Vista users by the end of the year. Believe it

    3. Re:Question for 2007: by gkhan1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's an idiotic comparison. ME was an in-between, a sideshow to keep the customers happy (and look how well that went) while the real OS was being developed. Vista is one of the largest investments microsoft has ever made. They're gonna push it hard. And virtually everyone who buys it (certainly corporations) won't care one iota about all the DRM stuff. "Look at all that pretty glass!" is going to be way, way more important.

    4. Re:Question for 2007: by unother · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think anyone is going to "buy" Vista. At least, not in a fundamental sense. Certainly, corporations won't... most large companies are just moving from 2000 to XP, and that's only because Microsoft has pulled the support rug from under them. For the average company there is not one compelling reason to move forward quickly.

      It's not like this is rocket science. Large companies were still running Windows 3.1 until 1997, and then moved to Windows NT 4. The move from that to 2000 was about five years ago. The move from Windows 3.1 to NT was obviously needed due to sheer obsolescence; the move from NT to 2000 was the same, albeit to a smaller degree (USB support, AD support).

      Vista is really an OS for consumers and to ensure Microsoft has a new product as promised. I see nothing good coming from Vista in the end. In many ways, it is the new ME: a stop-gap OS...

    5. Re:Question for 2007: by Carbonite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think anyone is going to "buy" Vista. At least, not in a fundamental sense.

      When a company or consumer buys a new PC with Vista preinstalled, part of the purchase price is for the OS. Just because they're not buying a boxed upgrade version doesn't mean they're not buying Vista. This is how Microsoft sold the vast majority of XP, so there's not much of a change here.

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    6. Re:Question for 2007: by divisionbyzero · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I don't think anyone is going to "buy" Vista."

      True, unless of course they are buying it to run under Boot Camp on a Mac. ;-)

    7. Re:Question for 2007: by Ucklak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The bare bones Xbox360 costs just as much as the OS for Ultimate Vista. You can do more with $400 on an Xbox than a media with a paid-for key with Vista.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    8. Re:Question for 2007: by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Informative
      Typically when a company buys a new PC, they get to specify the OS from short list -- XP home, XP Professional, and apparently more varieties of Vista than anyone is likely to be able to keep straight. Until relatively recently W2K, W2K professional, and Windows 98 would have been on the list as well.. (Yes the pricing for each and every one will be different). It's only home users that buy a box off the shelf who get the one-size-fits-all OEM OS with no idea of its cost and no real choice.

      Even a home user can buy a custom specified PC over the internet with their choice of OS, and, I think -- although I haven't tried it -- from some vendors without an OS if they really want it that way.

      What the original poster seems to be saying is that most companies will buy their boxes with Windows XP professional for quite a while. Could well be.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  2. Refreshing to see a pundit... by Dobeln · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...going through their predictions list for once. Also, he played the umpire quite well - that's some pretty harsh judgements. (Wrong on iPhone/iTV - heh.)

    1. Re:Refreshing to see a pundit... by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He gains some kudos for admitting he was wrong about OSX running on generic hardware. Other pundits would have insisted they were right.

    2. Re:Refreshing to see a pundit... by fatphil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing about known fraus Cringley would ever be refreshing exccept for him
      to admit to his lies, quit punditry, and bugger off out of the public eye
      for ever.

      7/15 tops.

      4) More bad news for Sun. That's true.
      http://news.com.com/Sun+recoups+server+market+shar e/2100-1010_3-6108453.html
      looks like sun's best server market share improvement in about 5 years.
      http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=SUNW&l=on&z=m &q=l&c=&c=%5EIXIC
      looks like sun shareholders are happy about what's happening too.

      So how can Cringley call that one true?

      11) Intel will rebrand itself and nobody will notice. Intel did, we didn't -- true.

      What rebranding? If they mean "they have new logos for, and new keywords to describe, new products", that's not rebranding. That's just bringing out new products, and making them distinguishablefrom their previous products. Such a 'rebranding' would be true for any company that brings out more than one product a year. If this is counted as true, it's utterly valueless.

      But heck, it's Cringley.

      Phil

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  3. I like number 10 by Jack+Malmostoso · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Italy this is already happening, with the main ISP (Telecom Italia) faking DNS problems to cover up the fact that they just can't deliver all the ADSL they sold. Despite the fact that they shape Bittorrent (and other P2P) traffic...

    1. Re:I like number 10 by SpectralDesign · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Curious!

      I'm on Rogers HighSpeed in Canada, and lately they've been shaping BT traffic, and the past few months having intermittent connectivity issues -- just a couple or few days ago the service wasn't working, but the lights on the modem all appeared fine... Needless to say, I didn't want to call customer support to be on hold for an hour or more and finally be told that they were working on the problem and to try it again the next day (useless!) so after a few hours and several resets of the modem I decided to try a ping from my router and lo and behold, it worked...

      I punched in the IP for a DNS server that I knew of, and used that to get the numbers for OpenDNS and now have my router issuing those with DHCP requests instead of the Rogers DNS servers. Funny -- everything has been working just fine since I made that change.

      Is Telecom Itialia also owned by Ted Turner?!? At any rate, it seems they went to the same "We've Oversubscribed, What Can We Do Now?" convention as each other.... Bastards!

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
  4. Easy prediction on DRM by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No DRM emerges as a winner? of course not, nobody wins with DRM, not even the record companies or the artists, as consumers hate it and it drives sales away...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by Dogers · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, somebody always wins with DRM.

      The companies that create DRM schemes, of course!

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    2. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by StringBlade · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really, because their DRM scheme either becomes a publicity nightmare (like Sony's rootkit) or it gets cracked very shortly after it's released and all those months (or years) of research and development are for naught, forcing them to start over again from scratch.

      I view DRM scheme creators in a similar light to anti-virus software makers: their task is never-ending because they are attacking the symptoms of a problem, not the problem itself and it's a very thankless job.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    3. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I view DRM scheme creators in a similar light to anti-virus software makers: their task is never-ending because they are attacking the symptoms of a problem, not the problem itself and it's a very thankless job.

      Flawed alternative problem in case 2:
      No technological solution exists for a social problem.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Not really, because their DRM scheme either becomes a publicity nightmare (like Sony's rootkit) or it gets cracked very shortly after it's released and all those months (or years) of research and development are for naught, forcing them to start over again from scratch.

      Microsoft's DRM scheme for the original XBOX worked pretty well. Sure, there were mod chips, but most people didn't have the time and energy to use them.

    5. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by Dogers · · Score: 2, Insightful
      their DRM scheme either becomes a publicity nightmare (like Sony's rootkit)

      By which time the company that created the DRM will have received their payment and have already laughed all the way to the bank

      or it gets cracked very shortly after it's released and all those months (or years) of research and development are for naught, forcing them to start over again from scratch.

      Likewise as before, the company will have received their payment, and probably have been hard at work on the next iteration ready for the company whose product they were protecting to ask "what about the next generation?" :)

      scamming(scammers--)++
      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  5. A bit wrong... by Karganeth · · Score: 5, Informative

    2007 prediction - "Still, no Internet-only song wins a Grammy or is even recognized as existing."

    This already happened in the UK in 2006. Crazy by Gnarls Barkely went to number 1 on the charts without having a single physical copy on sale. It is one of the best songs of 2006. It stayed at nubmer one for nine weeks.

    1. Re:A bit wrong... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's the UK, Bro. It's not real if it don't happen Stateside.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:A bit wrong... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't the UK the market where a Celphone ringtone hit the pop charts?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    3. Re:A bit wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gnarls Barkley - Crazy won a shitload of awards and was the best selling song of last year. BREAKING NEWS: You live under a rock.

    4. Re:A bit wrong... by cofaboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, that would be that poxy crazy frog ditty. Yes that was the UK

      /me hangs head in shame at poor taste of young Brits

      --
      In the end, It's all bovine dung you know
    5. Re:A bit wrong... by Andy_R · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good old America, the only place that can call something a world series without noticing they haven't invited any other countries... but back on topic, the chart rules when Gnarls Barkley hit number 1 excluded songs that were truly internet only, you had to have a physical CD or vinyl release. You were allowed to issue the download up to a week before the physical release hit the shops, and it was this rule that allowed them to number 1 before the physical release hit the shops. Recently the rules have been changed and a true internet only release now is allowed in the British charts.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  6. umm 69%? by atari2600 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article:

    That is my worst performance EVER. I got nine of 15 predictions correct for a 60 percent average. In my defense I'll point out that just because I am wrong now doesn't mean I'll still be wrong in another week. Three years ago I predicted Intel would support AMD's 64-bit instruction extensions, but they took 53 weeks to do so, making me off by seven days. I think that by the end of February, 2-3 of these predictions could still swing the other direction.

    Editors: Please RTFA? Thanks.

    1. Re:umm 69%? by Oddscurity · · Score: 3, Funny

      Getting 69 may just have been wishful thinking on the editor's part?

      --
      Indeed!
  7. MS support? by headpushslap · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Microsoft is discussing internally how to help Sony from going under, since that would create a raft of antitrust problems for Redmond. I am not making this up."

    Microsoft supporting another company (Apple)? What an unexpected event.

    Really, if this is a prediction, fire Nostradomus.

  8. Re:Help for the RIAA by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why don't they (the RIAA) just lossy-encode and decode all songs before releasing them on CD?

    Wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to just use a tin can on a string for a microphone?

    KFG

  9. Re:11. Intel rebrands self and no one notices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    They did rebrand.

    Old Logo and now ... New Logo.

    Did someone actually care? nope.

  10. IBM's Customers will Revolt by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just read here:

    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/predictions/bob/2006/p rediction_bob_20060104_000992.html

    However, Cringley goes into more overall depth in a previous article.

    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2006/pulpit_200 60518_000897.html

    MANY IBM employees DO feel this way, btw. IBM appears to be spending little in the way of future product development (including feature enhancements to current products), other than just outright buying companies and incorporating their products. Stock performance has been mediocre for years.

    Sooner or later, that kind of internal attitude starts showing up to your customers.

  11. Oops, my bad. Not Zonk...for once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm the submitter, and that figure was my typo: if you look down towards your fingers, you'll see that the '9' is right next to the '0'. I mean look down onto the keyboard... ;)

    1. Re:Oops, my bad. Not Zonk...for once. by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Informative


      I'm the submitter, and that figure was my typo

      And it's the editors job to find and correct obvious mistakes. Hence the "edit" of editor.

      --
      AccountKiller
  12. Re:Help for the RIAA by dangitman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because recompressed files are perfectly acceptable to most people, who wouldn't even notice the difference. Only a miniscule number of people would find it "unacceptable." And most of them probably couldn't hear the difference anyway - it's all ego like those "Monster Cables" and other shit that appeals to "audiophiles."

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  13. Under the rock by Rumagent · · Score: 2, Informative

    I sure do... I found it on youtube and it is quite good.

  14. Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by crovira · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We were supposed to have FTTH (fiber to the home) 20 years ago.

    We've been paying surcharges to get FTTH for 20 years.

    To date the Telcos and cablecos have delivered 0 inches of FTTH. Not an inch of fiber has been laid.

    And now America is quantitatively and qualitatively behind, in an area where we were the leaders, only to get surpassed by anybody who's actually laid in some FTTH.

    The difference of having bandwidth as opposed to starving for it is, well just imagine yourself back before the internet. Imagine yourself having to use carbon paper. Life was a lot slower then.

    Now with uTube and MoviesOnDemand, VideosOnDemand and the thirst for all kinds of streaming media, the demand for band is going to collapse the copper infrastructure. It wont melt the wire down as much as it will vaporize it in a coronal flare.

    If you work in management for a telco or a cableco, look for Federal indictments to come to your office before the decade is out.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by Christianfreak · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have FTTH from Verizon. I live in a suburb of Dallas. 15mB down 2mB up, 300+ TV channels (all digital) and phone service. Its all about $120. I'm very happy with the service.

    2. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by trifster · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a freaking troll post. there is finally tons of fibre being laid. verizon is laying fibre faster than a vegas prostitute and the cablecos are running fiber basically infront of every home. cringleys "not enough bandwidth" prediction is as good as SEN Stevens "fat pipes" comments. stupid old people.

    3. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by hitchhacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      15mB down 2mB up

      I wouldn't be bragging about 15 milliBytes a second...

      -metric

    4. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by jZnat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd hardly consider FIOS to be FTTP; Japan is getting about 30M/30M up/down, and Tokyo is getting around 50M/50M up/down (realistic numbers, not advertised ones). In fact, they've had reasonable FTTP services for a few years now, yet we can't even give people realistic amounts of bandwidth.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  15. This guy... try 40%, anyone have to add to this? by Zebra_X · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) I predicted that Apple would announce iPhone and iTV products as well as content deals. The content deals happened and some of the iTV technology was demonstrated, but I think we'll have to wait another week or so for the rest, so I guess I was wrong.

    Yeah, wrong. Not to mention that I wrote something about Apple moving in this direction a year and a half ago. This is no "prediction" its writing on the wall.

    2) I said OS X would run on generic Intel hardware, though Apple wouldn't support it. This is true in the sense that people have made OS X run on generic Intel hardware, but APPLE hasn't, so the item is wrong.

    There are a number of technical reasons that this will likely not happen. Yes, wrong.

    3) More products, services, and a stock split for Google. I was right about the first bits but that's like predicting sunset will come. The split didn't happen because I never realized how much cash Google was going to generate -- far more than they can even spend. So the item is wrong.

    Yeah, wrong

    4) More bad news for Sun. That's true.

    I might say that sun really has remained the same. If you use stock price as an indicator of "bad" then they are neither good nor bad. I might disagree with this assesment. Wrong.

    5) IBM customers revolt. It is happening slower than makes sense, but yes, they are revolting. True.

    Ok, whatever.

    6) More Vista delay. I'm going to claim this one because the Vista that's just appearing was delayed twice in 2006 alone and is a shadow of what it was intended to be. True.

    Yeah, no. You were wrong. Vista shipped in 06, I've seen the cd's myself.

    7) PS3 is in trouble as is Howard Stringer. This is all true. The PS3 was late to market, the blue laser diode shortage has hurt the company, developers aren't amused, and the word inside Sony is that Sir Howard is toast. True.

    Right.

    8) WiMax will suffer under Sprint Nextel. My feeling here was that merging the two cell companies would be too distracting for them to do very much with their top asset (in my view) -- all those WiMax licenses. Since they didn't roll out much of anything in 2006, I'd say this one is true.

    Not sprints fault. The standard hasn't really been ratified. There are only a few makers of the silicon necessary to drive the antennas. This has nothing to do with sprint and everything to do with the hardware. I'd say this is wrong.

    9) Media Center PCs still won't take off as they try to compete with cheaper embedded devices. True.

    Yeah, about right.

    10) TiVo will be bought. Obviously wrong, though I still don't see the company surviving as an independent. Wrong.

    No purchase, wrong.

    11) Intel will rebrand itself and nobody will notice. Intel did, we didn't -- true.

    Intel did not rebrand. They launched two new TV ads a few product logos - but they have the same "feel" of the last 15 years of advertising. I wouldn't really call that a "rebranding" effort. So, wrong.

    12) No desktop OS or PC from Google. People (not me) were absolutely convinced this time last year that Google was going head-to- head against Windows. Nope. It didn't happen, and won't. I was correct.

    Ok, right.

    13) Skype won't make much, if any, money for eBay in 2006 (or 2007). Skype got a lot of press and moved a long way toward building a better service that makes more business sense, but the company is still at least a year away from making money. True.

    Ok. Right

    14) Yahoo will surprise us. Wrong. Yahoo is in a crisis from which the company may not recover with current management. Sigh.

    Ok. Right.

    15) Apple will license technology from Burst. They should have by now but the companies are still fighting in court. For those following the fight, a hearing on February 8th will lead to a decision less than a month later that will tightly define this patent battle in a way that will make one

  16. Intel DID rebrand by aztektum · · Score: 3, Informative

    The fact that there are quite a few posts saying Cringely got that one wrong makes it look like he was in fact right. They dropped the Pentium brand name as their primary line, a name that they had been using for ~13 years. How many times have you looked at a software box and seen "Pentium Required/Recommended" over those last 13 years? The reason no one noticed is because it isn't as big a deal. Yes the Core 1/2 chips offer better power, performance and aren't as hot, but the average computer buyer doesn't look at hardware like that. They look at what software will work on it, Windows? Check. Office? Check. An Intel or AMD sticker only matters to zealots anymore.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  17. Re:11. Intel rebrands self and no one notices by agallagh42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You just proved his point about no one noticing. They don't use the "Pentium" brand anymore. The latest generation desktop processors are referred to as "The Intel® Core(TM) processor family".

    See?

    --
    Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer