Slashdot Mirror
Gilmore Loses Airport ID Case
smooth wombat writes "In the final conclusion to John Gilmore's fight to be able to fly on an airplane without providing identification, the United States Supreme Court, without comment, let stand an appeals court ruling which said that Gilmore's rights are not violated by being required to show proof of identity. Gilmore had argued that without being able to see the law which says one must provide identification before being allowed to board a plane, there is no way to know if the regulations call for impermissible searches."
Or use your own - like the 9/11 hijackers did.
They should allow him, and him alone, to fly without ID.
He'll just have to prove that he is him, so that they know that he is the one that doesn't need id.
Have you read my journal today?
IS there such a thing as a non-final conclusion?
We must be alert to the danger that public policy could become captive to a scientific-technological elite. - Eisenhower
I don't care how much training you have: crazy arab gets a box cutter, I get a .45 == I win.
.45 on a flight I'm on is going to get his fucking head blown off.
The first fool I see pulling out a
The subject field is not for typing your post.