Slashdot Mirror
Google Tops 100 Best Places To Work
inetsee writes "Fortune Magazine's annual '100 Best Companies to Work For' list is out, and Google topped the list in their debut appearance. Some highlights of the benefits of working for Google that caught my eye were the free gourmet meals and the massages. The chance to spend 20% of your time working on your own personal projects also sounds very appealing. Of course, with resumes rolling in at the rate of thousands a day, the competition is fierce."
Sue away...
http://www.wanderlist.com/worstUScompanies
"I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
try doing that as a vegan/veggie and you'll see that having a vegan/veggie-friendly cafeteria onsite would be great.
In my opinion the only big minuses with working for google are that
#1 it's in the valley (plenty of nicer places to live in the US/Canada, of course if you live to work this doesn't really matter)
#2 everybody and their dog is applying to work there, which means that the odds of the company culture deteriorating are not insignificant (not to mention that the bigger the company the more likely that it will become a series of fiefdoms and so on)
#3 given #2 the interview process is way way way way too convoluted and drawn out, but that's just to be expected with the sheer volume of resumes they receive: the downside is that it will turn away a lot of really qualified folks, since in general people at a certain level of competency/employability won't feel like putting up with that (since on average they'll have plenty of other companies vying for their services and honestly, you wouldn't want to hire somebody that's just going through the motions for a few months at their current job just waiting for your call, would you? that wouldn't be exactly the type of ethics you ought to go for IMHO).
-- the cake is a lie
Good location?
Apple is located in Cupertino, CA, in the middle of Silicon Valley. It is not a "good location". Silicon Valley is endless, boring, ugly suburban sprawl. You'd hope that it would at least be cheap to live in such a crappy place, but it's not, cost of living is very high. I know because that's where I am living right now, and I'm moving as soon as my lease is up. I don't know if you've ever lived here or not, but I think lots of people just think that it must be cool to live in California where you're near the ocean and it never snows...
Cisco seems to be on both lists. They are both the 11th best company and the 12th worst one. Something tells me this "worst company" page is just for people to rant about companies they don't like, not a subjective review of work environment.
The company is legendary here in Des Moines ... they can break virtually any law they care to, without consequence. They are the proverbial 900 lb gorilla. With a long history of owning the State senators and Attorney General. As an example, they finally got rid of the 'Hourly exempt' class in 1999, under Federal pressure ... how many years was that illegal under the FLSA?
Recently, they had to devalue, sorry, restate their mortgage portfolio by half ... just a little stock fluffing there ... before Citi bought that division - and then canned the lot of them. Oh, and the recently departed were not allowed to apply for any other Principal job for a year. Well, actually, once they were pick-slipped, they could *apply*, but Principal wouldn't even look at them. Yep, that's illegal.
Local headhunters have learned to (mostly) avoid the company ... send in an applicant, and they'll often come back with the line "We already had the applicant on file and were planning on contacting them in the near future." The first part is completely true ... you applied back in High School, they've kept your résumé on file. The second half? Well, the applicant will get a phone call ... now.
The company does do a lot of things right, and many divisions are good, even great places to work. But it's very much up to chance, unless you have friends on the inside already. Doesn't help that the senior execs are morally and ethically bankrupt.
And, of course, I seriously question how a company makes it onto the 'Top 100' list when their out-of-court settlements to former employees range into the hundreds-of-thousands. Regularly.
Hard feelings? ADNR sounds about right.
1) Industry leader
It's nice working for companies that are arguably industry leaders. That's why you'll always have a ton of people interviewing for Microsoft, Apple, Dell, Intel, Amazon, etc. Those big names, regardless of how you perceive the companies themselves, still look awfully good on resumes. And chances are, they have pretty darn good pay as well. There's also a good chance that the projects you will work on, have a pretty large scope. For many, it's great to say you worked on "Product X", even though your actual contribution may be rather small. It's still better than saying you worked on "Product Y" that no one has even heard of, or ever will.
2) Interesting projects
Before Google was at the top, and before it could offer all those really great benefits, you still had a bunch of upstart software engineers wanting to work there, because the projects were really interesting. Even if the benefits weren't there, and Google wasn't quite at the top yet, you'd still have engineers very interested in that space. Sure, not as many, but the people you would get could arguably be the best, since they're actually excited about the work.
In contrast, you've got a ton of smaller companies that could offer fantastic benefits, but if you're missing out on the above two things
-- jchenx
Have you ever lived anywhere else?
Silicon Valley is not paradise, but it's damn nice. The absolute worst thing about this area is the absurd housing costs.
Yeah, it's suburban sprawl-y, but the mountains and palm trees and beautiful weather more than make up for it. As you well know, it will be over 60 and sunny again tomorrow. At the beginning of January, for god's sake. There is a reason people want to live here and are willing to put up with the housing costs and taxes. It's fucking beautiful all the time. Mountains all over the place for hiking and biking, plus you can always head up to the Sierra for skiing. Tahoe could be a (long) day trip. And you know what? Firms down here pay enough to make it worth your while at least to rent, if not buy.
Where else would you live? The places that are cheap to live suck ass. I'm sorry, I won't dig my car out of the snow 3 months out of the year.
I moved here from Seattle and would fucking NEVER move back. The housing is almost as absurd but without matching salaries, traffic is an order of magnitude worse, and the weather just sucks ass. Seriously. The rain is novel for a few weeks, but after a winter you realize you never want to go months without seeing the sun again. Sure you can do outdoor activities, but I find the valley to be a lot more conducive to it, just because you can never find a dry day in the Northwest, and if you ever try to plan an activity for one of those days, it will rain anyway.
I can only imagine living on the West Coast, and between San Diego, Santa Barbara, the bay, Portland and Seattle, I'll take the bay area hands down...