Slashdot Mirror


Google Tops 100 Best Places To Work

inetsee writes "Fortune Magazine's annual '100 Best Companies to Work For' list is out, and Google topped the list in their debut appearance. Some highlights of the benefits of working for Google that caught my eye were the free gourmet meals and the massages. The chance to spend 20% of your time working on your own personal projects also sounds very appealing. Of course, with resumes rolling in at the rate of thousands a day, the competition is fierce."

11 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. Google... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful
    20% of time working on personal projects

    Fine, but if you're working in a smaller, less demanding company, you might have that time free, so you can work on the projects without the company knowing about it. Far better to market an idea independently than under the auspices of a large employer. At least you have the opportunity for profits far beyond a salary that way.

    gourmet meals, massages

    Just give me a decent salary, TYVM. If I want a massage, I can go to a masseur after hours. If I'm working in a city, I can pretty much order whatever I want to (and can afford) for lunch.

    -b.

    1. Re:Google... by lowrydr310 · · Score: 5, Funny

      $20 says the Google massage doesn't include a 'happy ending'...

  2. Large companies. by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fortune has a tendancy to concentrate on public companies, since that's their industry, pimping public companies. The vast majority of companies in the US are privately held, and under 1000 employees. I notice that none on this list are less than 1000 employees. They even have the gall to call those "small" companies.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  3. Compuglobalhypermeganet by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 5, Funny


    I tried starting my own company, but some geek guy in glasses bought me out.

    Now my pencils are all broken.

  4. This will probably not last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've worked at a technology company that had an on-demand gourmet chef, free massages, a concierge, free snacks and pop and very similar perks. Once somebody realized this was wasting a bunch of money and that people would work there even if there wasn't a gourmet chef, they dropped the perks all together. Alot of people then got angry about this and left and then things returned to normal. It is still one of the best places to work. Google has alot of money and they haven't had a chance to be taught a lesson in frugality. Once shareholders start demanding the impossible and they can not meet these demands with their profits from advertising only, you better believe that gourmet chef's job will be the first to go!

  5. Re:Best place, despite worst pay by Kalriath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you actually looked at Google's entry in the main index, you'd see that the reason they aren't on the pay table is because they refused to disclose that info. Don't believe me? Look here

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  6. Re:What about the 100 worst places? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Because whoever'd publish such a list would get hit with a defamation suit within the hour?

    Sue away...

    http://www.wanderlist.com/worstUScompanies

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  7. 20% of how many hours per week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > The chance to spend 20% of your time working on your own personal projects also sounds very appealing.

    I've known a few people that have worked there and some that do now. From what I understand, at least most of the time, you get to spend 20% of the 50-70 hours of your work week there on your side project. Yeah, the official work week is only 40 hours, and you're technically supposed to be able to spend 8 hours of that on your own thing... but managers being managers (even at Google), they still schedule the work like you're spending all 40 hours a week (and maybe a little more) on your real project and are displeased if you don't deliver.

  8. Re:What about the 100 worst places? by Kalriath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmm. Paypal isn't in that list. They've broken my account such that I can't use my existing account, can't sign up for a new one, can't get responses out of their technical support. They're the worst I've ever dealt with - Sony Online comes in second for me. They complete lost an order of mine and disappeared the payment. Right. And this matters how exactly to how good of an employer they are?
    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  9. Re:Intersting that Apple is missing - by Al+Dimond · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Good location?

    Apple is located in Cupertino, CA, in the middle of Silicon Valley. It is not a "good location". Silicon Valley is endless, boring, ugly suburban sprawl. You'd hope that it would at least be cheap to live in such a crappy place, but it's not, cost of living is very high. I know because that's where I am living right now, and I'm moving as soon as my lease is up. I don't know if you've ever lived here or not, but I think lots of people just think that it must be cool to live in California where you're near the ocean and it never snows...

  10. Re:What about the 100 worst places? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Personally, I view the entire exercise as a sham. I have personal experience with one of the companies on the list - Principal Financial - which I refer to as my year from hell.

    The company is legendary here in Des Moines ... they can break virtually any law they care to, without consequence. They are the proverbial 900 lb gorilla. With a long history of owning the State senators and Attorney General. As an example, they finally got rid of the 'Hourly exempt' class in 1999, under Federal pressure ... how many years was that illegal under the FLSA?

    Recently, they had to devalue, sorry, restate their mortgage portfolio by half ... just a little stock fluffing there ... before Citi bought that division - and then canned the lot of them. Oh, and the recently departed were not allowed to apply for any other Principal job for a year. Well, actually, once they were pick-slipped, they could *apply*, but Principal wouldn't even look at them. Yep, that's illegal.

    Local headhunters have learned to (mostly) avoid the company ... send in an applicant, and they'll often come back with the line "We already had the applicant on file and were planning on contacting them in the near future." The first part is completely true ... you applied back in High School, they've kept your résumé on file. The second half? Well, the applicant will get a phone call ... now.

    The company does do a lot of things right, and many divisions are good, even great places to work. But it's very much up to chance, unless you have friends on the inside already. Doesn't help that the senior execs are morally and ethically bankrupt.

    And, of course, I seriously question how a company makes it onto the 'Top 100' list when their out-of-court settlements to former employees range into the hundreds-of-thousands. Regularly.

    Hard feelings? ADNR sounds about right.