Slashdot Mirror


A 3D Printer On Every Desktop?

holy_calamity writes "Two Cornell researchers have designed an open source 3D printer that costs just $2,400. The self-assembly kit is part of what they call the Fab@Home project — they hope it will spark development of rapid prototyping for the consumer market in the same way the Altair 8800 did for personal computing in seventies." Here is a video showing a completed machine constructing a silicone bulb (16-MB WMV).
Update: 01/10 04:02 GMT by KD : The developers of this kit are at Cornell, not Carnegie Mellon University as the original post erroneously stated.

10 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. Heard of Youtube? by AaronBaker2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd rather not download a video my computer can't even play. Can some nice person post it on youtube?

  2. IP Issues to Hit Action Figure Market by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IP Issues to Hit Action Figure Market. Seems inevitable. Dad, can you print me a few dozen more Ninja Turtles? If it comes with a 3d scanner, kiss Barbie Good-Bye. Mattel becomes the next Sony.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:IP Issues to Hit Action Figure Market by Speare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mattel is ALREADY the next Sony; more like Sony is just copying Mattel Barbie legal tactics from the 60s.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  3. The uses are endless by traindirector · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Building and using one of these seems like a fun and even practical hobby. Ever get frustrated at the plastic parts that break and render something useless? Now you can make replacements. Ever wonder what to get for the person who has everything? Well, I'm pretty sure you could make them a lot of neat personalized things with one of these that they'll be stumped as to where you could have found them.

    This project obviously has a long way to go, but I think the comparison to early personal computers could be fair, given the huge realm of possibilities creating objects in 3D space opens.

  4. Where's the porn angle? by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the manufacturer's want one of these on every desktop, figure out how it will provide titillation (porn) to Joe User (and me too).

    Worked for the internet, dvd players, VCR's, cable and satellite TV, etc, etc.

    1. (immaterial)
    2. add porn
    3. profit!

    --
    Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
  5. What's the precision on these things? by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it's possible to use these to "print" inexpensive lego pieces (within 0.005mm precision, iirc) then I am *SO* sold....

  6. Amazing by saladpuncher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems a little expensive. Could someone build one of these printers and then print the printer itself and mail it to me? I promise to duplicate it as well and give some to my friends. Seriously though, if I owned a manufacturing company of any any kind I would be scared of this thing. In 30 years you might witness the end of large scale production of small consumer goods. Throwing a party? Print up the plates and forks and chairs and tables you need. Need a gift? Print up some Barbie dolls. In 50 years the only thing that might actually be sold are the plans needed to fabricate something and the "ink" for this thing. If I was very cynical I would say this could end capitalism itself :)

  7. Re:So What's Next Then? by crabpeople · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah well thats alot of what critics of DRM have been saying. If you make all these laws for music and drugs, when it comes time for nano forges to roll in, they will be used to enforce an artificial scarcity on everything. What could completely eliminate materialism would end up being for profit, like every other god damned invention.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  8. Re:Enviromental Impact? by tuomas_kaikkonen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're onto something important there!

    The printout should be easy to recycle back into print "ink". Perhaps using temperature to melt it down. So this material would be the "draft" test printout material that you print, heat, recycle, and print again with same material. Then when you got the final printout right, you would switch to the release quality material that is more robust. Or then again, just use the printed out "draft" version to make a mold and cast release materials.

    What do you think?

    Tuomas

  9. Re:Can't say much more than by WhyCause · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nah, that will never happen.

    Surgeons buy pieces from Dow because Dow has spent a lot of time and money certifying the safety of their process and parts with (among others) the FDA. Surgeons buy the parts, and don't have to be too concerned that a manufacturing defect or bad batch of materials slipped past QA. If (God forbid) QA flubs one, the surgeon can (legitimately) blame Dow. If you're doing the QA in your office, however...

    While part of the (exorbitant amounts of) money spent on any sort of health care ensures that everyone involved makes a tidy profit, you are paying much more for the guarantee of safety than anything else.

    In essence, silicone is cheap; the insurance and hassle involved with making a safe part is very much the antithesis of cheap.