Slashdot Mirror


Adult Film Industry Moving To HD DVD

profet writes "One of the heavyweights in the war between BlueRay and HD DVD has chosen its format. Various members of the adult film industry have decided on HD-DVD. The article says the reasons seem to be based primarily on cost of manufacturing. History has shown that the porn industry can be a driving factor for technology, as it was in deciding for the VHS format over BetaMax." Heise reports that US BlueRay press plants are refusing the adult industry's business (in German).

17 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. VHS vs. Beta by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mean the mythical VHS versus Beta where the "better" format lost, or the _real_ VHS vs. Beta war where the better format (longer tapes, for one thing) actually won but where people keep propogating the "Beta was better than VHS!" myth?

    1. Re:VHS vs. Beta by LeninZhiv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right on. I think the only reason more people don't point out the parallels between HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray to the last format war (SACD vs. DVD-Audio) was that SACD and DVD-Audio were both such catastrophic failures that only audiophiles even know what they were. Because in the mean time, mp3s took over.

      And if VHS was 'technically inferior' to Betamax, mp3 compared to SACD/DVD-A would be off the charts bad. And guess what people chose?

  2. History repeats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It really is VHS vs. BetaMax all over again. And it's even Sony again pushing the more expensive and less open option!

  3. one big difference by arazor · · Score: 5, Insightful


    In the VHS vs Beta days you couldn't get high quality porn for free. I want HD DVD to win as I have invested in it but I just don't think this will be a big push for team HD DVD.

  4. Oh its really hacked now... by tgatliff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With the porn industry behind HD-DVD now, there is little doubt that the HD-DVD format will be hacked into oblivion. Nothing inspires developers more than the possability of free porn....

  5. It's not bad, really. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me put it this way: It's like a real woman. Just because you can whip out a microscope and examine every inch of her body (every pimple, every blemish, every hair), doesn't mean you do. She's there, she's naked, presumably she wants to fuck you, so why are you counting the hairs in her landing strip?

    Same thing with HD. Yes, if you pause it and zoom in, it may look much worse. But you've got a giant HDTV and some nice surround sound; again, why count the hairs in her landing strip when you can just sit back and enjoy the show?

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:It's not bad, really. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well I think that's exactly the point.

      "Sitting back and enjoying the show" would be watching it on DVD.

      Going out and buying the HD version instead is like buying a microscope.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:It's not bad, really. by teal_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't get that. You want a woman right? Above the age of 11?

    3. Re:It's not bad, really. by imkonen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is that different from anything else in HD? I'm not going to miss any action in a football game on a regular cable broadcast, but if I'm to believe the ads for comcast HD I see everyday, I ASBOLUTELY MUST GET HD so I can REALLY appreciate the game. If you think you can see too much of a porn star on HD, why the hell would I want to watch a game populated by 350 pound linemen in HD?

    4. Re:It's not bad, really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Amen, it's the only reason I care. Btw - this does go both ways, guys, at least trim.

  6. HD-DVD will win over "Blu-Ray" because of names... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "HD-DVD" will win over "Blu-Ray" because of the name of the tech anyway...

    Average consumer: "WTF is Blue Ray?"
    Answer: "It lets you watch high-definition DVDs."
    Average consumer: "Is there a Red Ray?"

    Average consumer: "WTF is HD-DVD?"
    Answer: "It lets you watch high-definition DVDs."
    Average consumer: "Sorry I was such a dumbass."

  7. Re:Protect Reputation or Shoot Foot? by HappySqurriel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The more I have thought about it the more I think that the 'best' (and probably most plausable) outcome to this whole Blu-Ray vs. HD-DVD war is that both formats will retain enough support for the first few years that eventually every 'Movie Player' will support both formats; at that point the consumer doesn't care anymore and the each of the 'camps' will be fighting over content providers.

    Ultimately, if I see this as the likely outcome next christmas I will probably buy a HD-DVD player because I will have no worries about the content I buy not playing in future devices.

  8. Re:I'm not sure porn was that big a factor by Osty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most people could not see the quality difference between the two formats.

    The OP was not suggesting that Beta had higher quality pr0n. He was suggesting that in the VHS v. Beta war there was no interweb. When you can get (legally or illegally) high quality pr0n online, who cares if you can get high quality pr0n on HD-DVD as well?

  9. Bad Comparison by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been on /. before, but you can't call the war based on this.

    When VHS/Beta came around, there was no real way to watch that kind of content at home before. That was HUGE. Right now, that exists in the form of VHS and DVDs.

    People wanted VHS. Going from nothing to a way to record TV or watch movies at home when you want was HUGE. DVD->Whatever is just going to higher quality. There is no massive benefit like before.

    Then there is the computer factor. You know where I could watch high quality content without buying a $500+ player? My computer. You know where I can find tons of FREE content? My computer. The only competition that VHS had was "those kind" of theaters in the "bad part of town". People already are in the privacy of their homes

    Then there is the higher quality is not better argument.

    Let's face is, no one cares that much about this battle. It's almost NOTHING LIKE VHS/BETA. Same field (home video), same circumstance (two competing formats), same players (Sony on one side, this time with other people). But the reasons why people will choose a format are different. VHS was longer. Blu-ray is longer, but but since HD-DVD isn't limited to 60min like Beta was that isn't as much of an issue.

    Can't compare the situations. Doesn't hold up.

    Random theory: Blu-ray will win in end. Why? Cooler name. I have no idea.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  10. News for Nerds. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only on slashdot will a story about high-definition porn devolve into an argument about the superiority of star-wired token rings vs. Ethernet.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  11. I just don't get it by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's with the massive anti-HD sentiment regarding porn? What happened when you guys see a woman in real life? Do you go "EWWWWWWW! She's so hi-def! I can see her pores!" Christ, if detail really turns you off that much why not just confine yourself to viewing hentai?

    I think that just as most people (of the appropriate gender and orientation) prefer to see a naked woman in real life vs.a naked woman on DVD, so too would most people prefer to see a high-resolution picture of a naked woman vs. a picture which is so low-rez that you can actually see the individual pixels fairly clearly from 10 feet away (I can, at least.) Now don't get me wrong, that's not enough to make me want to rush out and buy an overpriced, over-DRM'ed piece of shit AND a new TV to use it with, but saying that HD is the TV equivalent of a microscope is just dumb. My laptop has a WUXGA (1920x1200) screen, and you'd have to be smoking some amazing crack to say that it makes naked women look uglier. It most certainly does NOT. It makes pictures--ALL pictures, regardless of whether or not they involve naked women--look vibrant and real in a way that makes owners of XGA-resolution laptops weep with envy. I suppose I COULD stare with my eyeball an inch from the screen and scream "AHHHHHHHH! I SEE A PIMPLE!" but... why? Just why would you do such a thing? Not to imply that imperfections bother me that much--on the contrary, I find that the plastic, 'pancake makeup' look to be pretty unappealing... I'm just saying, why would you go out of your way to look for such things?

    HD isn't a microscope; it's simply a MUCH NICER PICTURE TO LOOK AT.

  12. Re:Obligatory by 7Prime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More like, "She's there, she's naked, and probably wants to fuck every guy in the room BUT you."

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.