Slashdot Mirror
Cisco VP Explains Lawsuit Against Apple
Dekortage writes "The day after Apple announced its iPhone, Cisco sued over the name. Mark Chandler, Cisco's SVP and General Counsel, has posted an explanation of the suit on his blog: 'For the last few weeks, we have been in serious discussions with Apple over how the two companies could work together and share the iPhone trademark. ...I was surprised and disappointed when Apple decided to go ahead and announce their new product with our trademarked name without reaching an agreement. It was essentially the equivalent of "we're too busy."' What did Cisco want? '[We] wanted an open approach. We hoped our products could interoperate in the future.'" Another reader wrote to mention that already, Cisco's trademark might be in trouble in Europe.
I just trademarked "iDoorStop", "iPaperWieght", and "iNotFunny"
Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
Well, there's no doubt you'll be able to win any lawsuit contesting, "iNotFunny" :)
... There's no Troll here. Move along ..
It's a joke people
Bark less. Wag more.
It won't be long before we get the massive market re-branding: aPhone, aMac, and aPod
So soon I can tell all those mac fanbois to get aLife?
Laugh, it's funny.
I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.