Slashdot Mirror


Doomsday Clock To Advance

Dik Zak writes "Many news sites are reporting that the magazine Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists intends to move the hands of the Doomsday Clock on Wednesday 17 January. The clock was started at seven minutes to midnight during the Cold War and has been moved forward or back at intervals, depending on the state of the world and the prospects for nuclear war. Midnight represents destruction by nuclear war. It is not revealed in which direction the hands of the clock will be moved, but it should be safe to assume that they will move closer to midnight: the magazine cites 'worsening nuclear [and] climate threats.' The clock stood at two minutes to midnight when both the United States and the Soviet Union tested nuclear weapons in 1953. The farthest away from midnight it ever got was 17 minutes, in 1991 when both superpowers signed the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. It currently stands at seven minutes to midnight."

26 of 283 comments (clear)

  1. Midnight? by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, is that Eastern Standard Time?

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:Midnight? by lag10 · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, doomsday clock advances you! (Sorry, but I just had to say that.)

  2. I know this one by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jack Bauer will disarm the russian ICBM 10^-23 second before it detonates, so we haven't got anything to worry about!

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:I know this one by JamesTRexx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if he can't, I'm sure Chuck Norris has a few spare Roundhouse kicks around.

      --
      home
  3. strike 12 already... by 10100111001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sick of waiting for the return of my deity.

    1. Re:strike 12 already... by Matt+Edd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey! Some of us don't have a deity so keep it down.

  4. Re:Hyperbole? by solevita · · Score: 2, Funny

    You Slashdotters are all the same; the only way to win against you guys is by not playing!

  5. Preemption by ewg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some superpower or another needs to preemptively attack and destroy this doomsday clock before it hurts someone.

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
    1. Re:Preemption by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Funny

      All right. I guess I can spare one and still be feared.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  6. Iron Maiden! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Suddenly I realize where the song title comes from.

  7. Re:Arbitrary? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    I doubt there is an equation involved. But I think one look at today's front page of slashdot justifies moving the hands a little closer to midnight:

    • A schoolteacher could get 40 years because her antivirus software subscription ran out.
    • A schoolboard rules that global warming is a "mere" scientific theory.
    • The US continues to use some idiot system of measurement based on some dead dude's foot.
    • The next Star Trek film is about Kirk and Spock -- The Early Years.
    • Shatner was allowed to break the news.

    If these aren't a sure sign of the apocalypse (especially the last item), I don't know what is.

    GMD

  8. DST? by aztec+rain+god · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't this be a good reason to get rid of daylight savings time?

    --
    Sig cannot be found.
  9. CST? Uhoh... by benhocking · · Score: 4, Funny

    That means those of us on Eastern Standard Time have already experienced Doomsday. (Psst, Central folk, his name is..., nah, let them experience it, too.)

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:CST? Uhoh... by dryeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean they are a bunch of Newfies?
      (For those who don't know Newfoundland is in a half hour timezone and on Canadian TV shows are always advertized as starting 1/2 hour later in Newfoundland. And of course the Newfies are just weird so are the butt of many a joke)

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  10. Re:One Bomb is Not "Doomsday" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    Strangelove: I would not rule out the chance to preserve a nucleus of human specimens. It would be quite easy...heh, heh...(He rolls his wheelchair forward into the light.) at the bottom of ah...some of our deeper mineshafts. Radioactivity would never penetrate a mine some thousands of feet deep, and in a matter of weeks, sufficient improvements in drilling space could easily be provided.

    President: How long would you have to stay down there?

    Strangelove: ...I would think that uh, possibly uh...one hundred years...It would not be difficult Mein Fuehrer! Nuclear reactors could, heh...I'm sorry, Mr. President. Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely. Greenhouses could maintain plant life. Animals could be bred and slaughtered. A quick survey would have to be made of all the available mine sites in the country, but I would guess that dwelling space for several hundred thousands of our people could easily be provided.

    President: Well, I, I would hate to have to decide...who stays up and...who goes down.

    Strangelove: Well, that would not be necessary, Mr. President. It could easily be accomplished with a computer. And a computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross-section of necessary skills. Of course, it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition.

    Naturally, they would breed prodigiously, eh? There would be much time, and little to do. Ha, ha. But ah, with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present Gross National Product within say, twenty years. ... (later) ...

    General Buck Turgidson: (judiciously) You mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Wouldn't that necessitate abandoning the so-called monogamous form of sexual relation ship?

    Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to perform prodigious service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics, which will have to be of a highly stimulating order.

  11. Re:Arbitrary? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Funny

    They are (or, at least, were at the time) a slightly more serious threat than a Star Trek movie.

    Come on... Star Trek, the early years? I'd rather be nuked.

  12. Dumb by VanHalensing · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is by far one of the dumbest ideas in the history of mankind. It'll just cause panic for no reason!

  13. stupid clocks.... by dnc253 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Where did they get their doomsday clock? On my former planet we got one of those, but we could never figure out how to program it, so it just blinked 12:00.

    ...And our world tragically came to an quick end......

  14. Re:Hyperbole? Define "blow up the planet" by EvanED · · Score: 4, Funny
    At least one person agrees with you:


    Things which will NOT destroy the Earth: ....
    * Detonating all the nuclear weapons ever created simultaneously, either all at one location or strategically placed around the globe. This will irradiate pretty much the entire globe and kill an awful lot of people, animals and plants, but will actually destroy very little of the planet itself.

    How to Destroy the Earth
  15. yawn by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 3, Funny

    Meanwhile, the Who-Still-Gives-A-Flying-Fig-About-The-Doomsday-Cl ock Clock remains stuck on flashing 12:00

  16. Re:OMG I've got 7 minutes to live!!! by Maegashira · · Score: 2, Funny

    start wanking for one last time

  17. PST by Ikcor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn, that means Doomsday will be tape-delayed on the west coast.

    1. Re:PST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And they'll edit out all the really good stuff.

  18. Re:Hyperbole? Define "blow up the planet" by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yes. Always the same shit from the environmentalists - "humans going to blow up the planet". Greenpeace actually said, in one of their 90s pamphlets "humans about to destroy all life on earth"... Idiots. We may be able to take care of small flightless birds, we may be pretty good at wiping out most of the fish stocks, but humans could never destroy life on earth.

    Course we can't. Roaches have 600 times the radiation resistance that humans do, right up there with Neocons. Course, who can tell the difference these days?

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  19. Re:Hyperbole? Define "blow up the planet" by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure, if you just drop bombs randomly, we probably couldn't blow up the planet. Give them to me and I'm sure I could split this sucker in half. Am I restricted just to using them on Earth or can I use them in space too?

  20. Re:Hyperbole? Define "blow up the planet" by SamSim · · Score: 4, Funny

    On that topic, amateur geocide watchers and fans of the International Earth-Destruction Advisory Board will be reassured to learn that unlike the Nuclear Death Clock, the Current Earth-Destruction Status is expected to remain at its current status of "Not Destroyed" for the forseeable future.