Slashdot Mirror


PCI SIG Releases PCIe 2.0

symbolset notes that The Register is reporting that PCI SIG has released version 2.0 of the PCI Express base specification: "The new release doubles the signaling rate from 2.5Gbps to 5Gbps. The upshot: a x16 connector can transfer data at up to around 16GBps." The PCI-SIG release also says that the electromechanical specification is due to be released shortly.

3 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Confusing article texts... by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Informative

    The signalling rates are measured in GT/s not Gbps (correct me if I'm wrong). The new release doubles the current 2.5 GT/s to 5 GT/s. As a comparison, the 2.5 GT/s is about 500 MB/s bandwith per lane thus 16 GB/s in a 32 lane configuration.

    I tried to do the math but I just can't get it right with Gbps instead of GT/s.

    http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2005/volume09i ssue01/art02_pcix_mobile/p01_abstract.htm

    1. Re:Confusing article texts... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's 2.5 and 5.0Gbps, but with a 10 bits to encode 1 byte (8 bits), so net 250MB/s to 500MB/s, which works out to 16GB/s in a 32-lane config. "The upshot: a x16 connector can transfer data at up to around 16GBps." in the article is simply wrong.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  2. Re:Why 'PCI'? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Informative

    It has more to do with PCI than you think.

    While the electrical interface has changed significantly, the basics of the protocol have not changed much at all, at least at a certain layer.

    The end result is that at some layer of abstraction, a PCI-Express system appears identical to a PCI system to the operating system (as another poster mentioned). BTW, with a few small exceptions (such as the GART), AGP was the same way. Also, (in theory) the migration path from PCI to PCI Express for a peripheral vendor is simple - A PCI chipset can be interfaced with a PCI Express bus with some "one size fits all" glue logic, although of course that peripheral will suffer a bandwidth penalty compared to being native PCIe.

    Kind of similar to PATA vs. SATA - Vastly different signaling schemes, but with enough protocol similarities that most initial SATA implementations involved PATA-to-SATA bridges.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?