Slashdot Mirror


The Anatomy of Pump n' Dump Stock Spamming

giorgiofr writes "Laura Frieder and Jonathan Zittrain have analyzed pump n' dump spam activity in their paper 'Spam Works: Evidence from Stock Touts and Corresponding Market Activity'. Unbelievably, it appears that spammers are able to achieve a 5% gain on pumped stock before dumping it, along with a dramatic increase in transaction volume of the stock. From the synopsis: ' We suggest that the effectiveness of spammed stock touting calls into question prevailing models of securities regulation that rely principally on the proper labeling of information and disclosure of conflicts of interest to protect consumers, and we propose several regulatory and industry interventions. Based on a large sample of touted stocks listed on the Pink Sheets quotation system, we find that stocks experience a significantly positive return on days prior to heavy touting via spam. Volume of trading responds positively and significantly to heavy touting.'"

10 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. Invest in spam-filter companies ;) by Reverse+Gear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bet many or maybe even most of the people who start buying the stocks being spammed, buy them in the expectancy that the spamming will make the value of that stock rise.
    Thereby they reinforce this strange mafia way of making money and worst of all they make sure that loads of spam will keep on putting even more pressure on the internet.

    The only sensible conclusion I am able to draw from this is that it probably will pay of to invest in the spam-filter companies ;)

    1. Re:Invest in spam-filter companies ;) by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mainly it's illegal because the rules prohibit it. Obviously there's no natural law that says that you can't pump-n-dump, just as there's no natural law governing any other game that we humans play.

      The rule is in place simply because it makes the game fair, fun, and profitable. We could change it if we desired, if we all decided that we wanted our stock markets to be most profitable to spammers.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  2. "Follow the money"? by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really, this should be the easiest to crack. Someone has to take the money. Or some company which then turns it over to some person. The SEC should be busting these left and right.

    1. Re:"Follow the money"? by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really, this should be the easiest to crack. Someone has to take the money. Or some company which then turns it over to some person. The SEC should be busting these left and right.

      Except, you've missed the point on the very reason these scams do make money - Because people buy these stocks realizing them as pump-n-dump scams, hoping to trade out in time.

      Pretty easy, actually...

      1) Get stock spam
      2) See if the price has gone up in the past week. If so, forget it. If not, continue o step 3
      3) Buy a few thousand shares
      4) Watch the price carefully.
      5) The second it starts going up, sell sell sell! Don't try to time it for best profit, dump ASAP.
      6) Profit!


      So, by "following the money", they'd potentially catch honest traders as well as those running the scam.

    2. Re:"Follow the money"? by garyrich · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mutual fund managers are almost never empowered to trade the "pinks". Plus why would they bother risking their $$$$$ jobs for a 5% profit? Part of the reason they can't/don't is that you just can't put large amounts of $ to work in these stocks. Even if they truly loved some penny stock and thought it would be the next microsoft - you can't invest even as little $10M in a company with $50M market without totally distorting the market - easier to just do a buy out the company of you like it that much.

      In theory you could write a few lines of java/lisp/perl into your favorite automated trading platform and seek out the patterns of the spammers taking their position before they start pumping. That is, if they traded on some "real" exchange you could. In the "pinks sheets" there are no market makers, frequently no level 2 quotes, etc. Not enough data to easily find the patterns. As others have pointed out, this is also what makes it hard to prosecute the pumpers, they data trail is just too thin.

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    3. Re:"Follow the money"? by rstultz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm pretty sure it's much simpler than you think to figure out the "algorithm." I thought about this last fall, and looked at two stocks that made it through my filter. One had an approximately 8 day cycle and the other had something like a 17 day cycles. It wasn't exact, but over the previous 6 months it was pretty steady, every 6-10 days on the first stock and every 15-19 days on the other one. I didn't check it to a calendar all the way back, but it seemed the variation was due to weekends.

      I seriously considered trying to beat the spammers, buy the day before they were buying, sell at the high.

      That is until I talked to my attorney friend, who convinced me the risk wasn't worth it, that if you did get investigated for doing this, you'd have to work pretty damn hard to convince them that you had nothing to do with the Pump and Dump scheme, and that it was a grey area if you can profit off a pump and dump (even if you had nothing to do with it).

      I still think it's a good idea.

      Ryan Stultz

    4. Re:"Follow the money"? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Informative

      >> 1) Get stock spam 2) See if the price has gone up in the past week. If so, forget it. If not, continue o step 3
      >
      > You could also short the stock at this point...

      You've just sent anybody who understands stocks into gales of laughter. You don't understand how shorting a stock works. Shorting a stock requires that you borrow shares from a broker who has shares available to be borrowed. You then sell the shares and leave the money with the broker as collateral for the borrowed shares, plus a little more out of your own pocket as margin. If the stock goes up, you must supply the broker with more collateral money (that's called a margin call). When you decide to close out the short, or if you're forced to by a margin call when you don't want to come up with more cash, you buy the stock, give it to the broker to replace the borrowed shares, and reclaim your money. All this depends on a broker having shares he's willing to let you borrow. The chances of scam penny stocks like this being available to borrow from any broker is absolutely nil. These stocks simply cannot be shorted.

      Chris Mattern

  3. Re:Why there is spam, how to get rid of spam by Joebert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with that, is that there's millions of middle-low class citizens in the world that are fully aware they will never have the things of thier dreams without taking a chance now & then.

    Spam like that is successfull for the same reasons lotterys are successfull.
    Not because people don't know, but because they're prone to greed.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  4. Caveat emptor by pkaral · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I assume most will not read the paper, so here is a couple of points to consider before weighing into the discussion:

    * The touting is not illegal in and of itself - most touters are even including disclosures about their own activities (it is, however, one of the authors' recommendations to nail some of them for breach of CAN-SPAM)
    * These are not NASDAQ or NYSE stocks, and don't behave anything like that. Those are unknown, small stocks with very small trading volumes. The touter and the people he is fooling are often making up much of the trading activity in the period around the touting. They are also "penny" stocks, which "tick" in pretty large increments (percentagewise).
    * Consequently, the only people likely to benefit or hurt are the touters and the people who bought into their messages (i.e. no "innocent bystanders")

    It is unclear to me that this is a problem for the regulators, at least not from the point of view of protecting the "victims". After all, people are free to make bad choices and these are not fraud cases (the authors note that this is "investor irrationality"). There is, however, a negative impact on everyone else, because this sustains high spam levels. Probably the "CAN-SPAM direction" is the regulatory way to go, rather than something more specific related to touting of financial assets.

    There is an old saying that goes caveat emptor - Let the Buyer Beware.

  5. The other side of the story... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a friend who works for one of the big 5 accounting firms as a Financial Securities Auditor. The wife and I had dinner at his house last night. He was telling me that one of the biggest areas of securities fraud that he is seeing right now is the pump-n-dump scams. I thought I understood it all...

    The Phishers will phish usernames and passwords for brokerage accounts, or they will collect the information from personal users by means of a trojan. The criminals log into these accounts and schedule sell orders for whatever stocks they are holding, and schedule buy orders for the penny stock they are going to pump-n-dump. Then they walk away.

    They execute the spam, eager traders read the spam, look at the account and see that volume of shares purchased have been bought up in the past n-hours and they jump in. The pumpers have bought their stock before hand and once the volume peaks, they dump. The account holders whose accounts were compromised are left holding the pumped-dumped stock...

    The criminals are getting GOOD! They don't need to worry about transferring money out of the compromised brokerage accounts, they are stealing the money and laundering it all in the same step.

    The big targets for the brokerage account takeovers are in Tiawan, the targets for the spam are American "day traders". Apparently, the Tiawanese accounts are big targets because all the business deals in China are written according to Tiawanese law, and all securities trading is handled out of there.

    And it should be no big suprise that the criminal organizations behind the whole operations is the Russians.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.