Slashdot Mirror


XFCE Adds Icons, Switches to Thunar in v4.4

b100dian points out yesterday's release of XFCE 4.4, writing "If you have already followed the release candidates, you know that XFCE is really evolving. Besides adding desktop icons, introducing Thunar (in lieu of xffm) and MousePad, applications that are as simple as they are effective, and Terminal, which has built-in support for desktop composition (supported by the window manager out-of-the-box), it also introduced (finally!) a shortcut for the pop-up menu (you can see in the tour that Ctrl-Esc is bound to this menu). Congratulations for the lightest and slickest window manager ever:)" I've been using Thunar a lot lately (mostly under Gnome) because the renaming feature is powerful but reasonably intuitive -- very handy for cleaning up digicam photo names.

9 of 83 comments (clear)

  1. Thunar... by albalbo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although the link is incredibly informative, here's more info about Thunar.

    --
    "Elmo knows where you live!" - The Simpsons
  2. "Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment..." by xtracto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Finally a Proper envieronment!.I love Xfce. I use it mainly via Xubuntu. From the release visual tour I can see this version is really nice. However, "niceties" require processsing power to display (like the fancy icons or alpha blending). I am afraid Xfce could end like firefox (which started as the "lightweight" version of Mozilla and now is itself bloated).

    The text editor (mousepad) is very nice, simply that, an easy to use text editor (without :icryptic^M^Mkey combinations^[:wq! required to edit a file).
    Recently I had to "downgrade" a notebook to only 256 MB and decided to install Xubuntu. It runs really fine and does whatever I need it to do.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  3. Re:XFCE - whazzat?? by shirizaki · · Score: 2, Informative

    XFCE is a desktop environment like KDE and Gnome.

    Desktop environment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desktop_environment

    But unlike Gnome and KDE, XFCE tries to be lighter than those 2 GUI's.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dots slash you!
  4. Re:Yay! by stavrosg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Autostart was in anyway. There is a nice GUI to manage it now, nothing more, nothing less.

  5. Re:Biased Drivel by KillerBob · · Score: 3, Informative
    What a load of biased drive! After considering Fluxbox, Icewm, wmaker and a slew of other window managers; Xfce doesn't even come close to being the "lightest." Granted, it is light in comparison to GNOME/KDE but come on people lets be a tad more objective.


    XFCE isn't actually a window manager. It includes a window manager, but it's a desktop environment. There's a difference. XFCE adds features that you simply won't see in any of the ones you mentionned, because they *aren't* dekstop environments.

    TFA isn't biased, it's just ignorant.
    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  6. Re:Lightest? by fistfullast33l · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, window manager is wrong, desktop environment is right, however XFCE is pretty cohesive and a great alternative to GNOME. I haven't used it in a while because I've been using E17 but I think the stability of XFCE is something to take into account. It's a great alternative for those who hate the bloat of GNOME and KDE but like the flexibility to use a great theme framework like GTK. Combined with multiple taskbars now you really have a powerful desktop in a fast framework. Kudos to XFCE.

  7. Re:Thunar... lacks SMB/NFS/Network support by armanoid57 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    fopen("/dev/null", O_TRUNC) and write ("hole")
  8. Re:Does it to automagic USBKeys yet? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes it does. Well, it does on Xubuntu anyways

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  9. Re:Lightest? by CronoCloud · · Score: 2, Informative

      PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND

    fluxbox 0.9.13
    4668 CronoClo 0 0 2028 1376 972 S 312 0.0 4.5 0:19 fluxbox

    Enlightenment 16.999

    7398 CronoClo 0 0 11520 11M 4080 S 3312 1.7 37.7 0:34 enlightenmen

    XFCE 4.2.2

    7506 CronoClo 0 0 10200 9940 7056 S 5996 0.0 32.5 0:18 xfce4-panel
    7504 CronoClo 0 0 5980 5684 4124 S 3560 0.0 18.6 0:15 xfdesktop
    7502 CronoClo 0 0 4424 4036 3408 S 2532 0.0 13.2 0:01 xfwm4
    7497 CronoClo 0 0 2808 2412 2000 S 1868 0.0 7.9 0:00 xfce4-sessio
    7499 CronoClo 0 0 3100 1780 1312 S 1296 0.0 5.8 0:00 xfce-mcs-man

    KDE2.2.2

    7617 CronoClo 0 0 8192 7592 6848 S 6448 0.0 24.8 0:03 kdeinit
    7619 CronoClo 0 0 5368 4700 3668 S 3116 0.0 15.4 0:09 kdeinit
    7615 CronoClo 0 0 3428 2648 2252 S 2040 0.0 8.6 0:02 kdeinit
    7630 CronoClo 0 0 2272 1380 1128 S 944 0.0 4.5 0:00 kdeinit
    7598 CronoClo 0 0 2124 1324 1072 S 888 0.0 4.3 0:01 kdeinit
    7595 CronoClo 0 0 1916 1184 1004 S 860 0.0 3.8 0:00 kdeinit
    7614 CronoClo 0 0 1608 968 704 S 652 0.0 3.1 0:01 ksmserver
    7613 CronoClo 0 0 1876 708 508 S 412 0.0 2.3 0:00 kdeinit
    7589 CronoClo 0 0 1476 688 620 S 480 0.0 2.2 0:00 kdeinit
    7592 CronoClo 0 0 1372 588 456 S 372 0.0 1.9 0:00 kdeinit
    7632 CronoClo 0 0 1548 552 416 S 312 0.0 1.8 0:00 kdeinit