Slashdot Mirror
Verizon Rejected iPhone Deal
SnowDog74 writes "According to an article in USA Today, Verizon Wireless rejected an Apple deal over the iPhone. The article says that Verizon wasn't happy with the strict terms Apple demanded — a Verizon Wireless VP is quoted saying that Apple wanted a cut of monthly revenues and control of the customer relationship. What's perhaps equally interesting, however, is the implication from sources that say Cingular's exclusive 5-year deal with Apple applies within the United States only. If this is true, it undermines some of the criticism Apple has been receiving for their business strategy surrounding the iPhone, given the size of the cell-phone market outside the US."
Customer service numbers? They might pride themselves on those numbers, but they are as full of crap as their systems. I'm sorry, any company who has a known issue of the IVR dropping options off of peoples accounts for years, that then decides to not fix the IVR system is not what I would call customer-oriented.
Or how about the fact that they care so much about their customers that they require their call reps to handle anything non-call related in their spare moments between making call quotas? You know, those little things like recalculating bills that have gone awry (see IVR) or filing the paperwork...
My wife worked for Verizon, the only thing they care less about then their customers is their computer systems - except for th mice, those have to be installed by an expert technician. Probably not the same one that installed the fully tested software update that took down your entire department yesterday, cannot be backed out of, and is costing you your paycheck (if your not answering phones, your not earning...)
Yep, customers are number one, provided you qualify that statement as "after everythig else but the computer systems..."
Whee signature.
Why does that matter? The deal with Cingular has been reported to mean that the iPhone is exclusively available to Cingular customers. For Apple to sell the phone overseas, that exclusivity clause would have to specifically indicate the US market only or Apple could get sued by Cingular for selling the iPhone in other countries.
So it's still important to note that the deal with Cingular applies only to the US market because it opens up the possibility that the iPhone will be available to users in other countries.
As a retailer, I found their policies to err on the side of customer benefit.
Ermm... I had 4 lines on a family plan...We were all happily using our 1800 minutes or whatever, and i was paying 170 or 180 a month. One month, there was a crisis in the family, and the total of calls was quite a bit in excess of our minutes, to the point that my bill was $680... I called customer service and explained the situation, and they said they'ed forward that along with a backdated request to up my minute allotment since i never went over and always paid on time... They said that this was a situation they've had before and that was usually the way that it was remedied... a few days later, i got a call from them that said that billing had determined that it "wasn't in the customers best interest" to do so...
Now, if they had said "sorry, but there's nothing we can do about it" that'd have been one thing... But they said "there is something we do about that" and then turned around and decided NOT to... That has made me one unhappy verizon customer... Of course, I'm sticking with them because my contracts up in June, and guess what comes out then on another network?
So no... I can't see how verizon is a customer service oriented carrier... everything with them is like pulling teeth...
"but they demand total control of their phones and what you put on them in return."
That's exactly why Verizon would never accept the iPhone. Apple wants total control over the phone and its design and how it looks. Verizon wants the same.
What do you get when two immovable objects stare across a room at each other?
The third one that realizes that denying people the ability to do what they want with what they pay for gets the big deal. Cingular doesn't cripple its phones.
Verizon getting the iPhone would have shocked me.
I'm also glad it didn't go CDMA in general -- I don't want to have to call support just to do something simple like change phones.
i am a soviet space shuttle
by far the world's users who are willing to pay premiums for nice phones reside outside USA. go with verizon, and u'll limit yourself to handful of CDMA countries. go with cingular, and u'll open up nearly every country in europe and asia.
people in USA are too used to these "$49 RAZR" deals that they can't possible imagine paying $499 for the iPhone. european and asian users will. now if we can get Apple to strike deals with SK Telecom or NTT DoCoMo, then u're all set.
Was chatting with the local Cingular store manager and he mentioned that the iPhone is only to be sold from the Apple store. The local store franchises will not be allowed to sell these units.
He was a bit peeved, he's fielding 10 calls a day on the damn thing and just feels the dollars flying down the block to the Apple Store.
In Palo Alto on University Ave.
Might be common knowledge, I was suprised.
The biggest WTF in the US mobile phone system is you pay to recieve calls.
meh
The ROKR was a Motorola phone using their OS and an iTunes-branded MP3 player. The mobile version of iTunes was written in Java and is likely completely custom. The ROKR was discontinued and replaced with the SLVR L7, a bar phone version of the RAZR. SLVRs purchased through Cingular or Rogers Wireless in Canada still come with iTunes, although Apple officially stopped supporting it in September and new music purchases won't play back. Phones sold elsewhere come with a Motorola-branded MP3 player instead of iTunes.
Long story short, Apple has yet to sell a single cell phone. Frankly, I'm all with you on the Newton analogy. Once Apple dries up the supply of people who will buy anything with an Apple logo, I don't think the iPhone is going to sell very well at all.