Blu-ray/HD DVD Disc Sales Numbers Revealed

An anonymous reader writes "The High-Def format wars finally have a yardstick against which to measure who's winning with the first public release of VideoScan sales figures for both HD DVD and Blu-ray. The first two weeks' worth of data seem to back up what many predicted — that the Blu-ray-enabled PS3 is helping Sony quickly close the gap with HD DVD, with almost three Blu-ray discs sold for every one HD DVD during the first week of January. HD DVD still leads in overall discs sold since inception, but that lead looks to be quickly dwindling. While they do show a trend, the results from VideoScan are still fairly vague. Why are consumers being denied the information they need to make a considered choice?"

Comments

Haven't we been here before?

[alshithead]

This hurts the consumer on way too many levels. You might as well release music in several formats...Oh, wait a minute...where's my 8 track player? Ooh! I just found my Betamax VCR. Screw this DVD shit, it won't last out the year's end.

Save yourself some time

[dracocat]

Save yourself some time, no need to read any more comments. Here is a summary of all replies about to follow this article, in no particular order.

• Sony has never won a format war, haven't they learned their lesson? Just look at Beta and MD.
• Sony has had great sucess with their formats, can you say CD?
• There is no reason for anybody to even upgrade past DVD. There is simply no big difference between any new formats and DVD
• I simply will not buy anything from Sony after the whole DRM fiasco
• HD will win out because there will be more HD players on the market because of the cheap HD DVD add on for the Xbox 360
• There will be more Blue Ray players on the market because every PS3 comes with a Blue Ray drive
• Nobody will buy the HD DVD drive addon for the Xbox 360 because it is too expensive
• Nobody will buy the PS3 because it is too expensive
• Blue Ray disks hold more information than HD DVD disks and so Blue Ray will win
• HD DVD disks hold more information than Blue Ray disks so HD DVD will win
• What are you guys talking about? Its all about Nintendo
• Neither format will win because people will be downloading movies from here on our
• The name HD DVD just sounds better than Blue Ray
• The name Blue Ray just sounds better than HD DVD
• Movies these days are worthless I havent watched a movie in 25 years

Hopes this helps shed some light on which format is better.

Re:Save yourself some time

[aardvarkjoe]

You forgot one:

• How did you manage to misspell Blu-ray seven times in a single post when it's in the story title?

Re:Surprised

[AKAImBatman]

FWIW, Bluray is superior to HD-DVD in many ways. So it has had (and still has) a good chance of "winning" against the competing HD-DVD format. The real problem with such a "win" is that it's not much of a "win" if you claim victory in the battle, but lose the war. Allow me to explain.

Despite all the hype surrounding HD-this and High Resolution-that, there hasn't been a major push by consumers to move to the new High Definition televisions. As it would seem, the vast majority of consumers are happy enough with their TVs as they are today. The real consumer push has been a much different one than quality.

Consumers today are looking for convenience first and quality second. They want to be able to sit in their living room and chose what they want to watch (or play!), when they want to watch it. Nothing makes this more apparent than the popularity of the TIVO and other DVR players.

These players timeshift shows from their regular schedules to a time that is more convenient for the viewer. Thanks to thier ties with online TV schedules, a user can setup his DVR to record dozens of shows. When he feels in the mood to watch something, he can then chose from the options at his disposal.

However, this process does have its drawbacks. The first one is that DVRs cause a drop in show quality. In order to balance real-time recording with space constraints, these devices must throw away a lot of information about the television stream. As a result, the quality drops.

The second drawback is that these devices have limited capacity. Once they are full, you must remove some material in order to make room for more material. This biases the devices against consumers who watch television on few, rare occasions, but enjoy a wide variety of entertainment.

The solution on the horizon is not digital transmissions over the airwaves, by digital cable, or even by plastic frisbees. The solution is to stream the video directly to the consumer over a broadband internet line. This allows the consumer to access a wide variety of quality material, but without the same storage drawbacks that limit DVR devices.

So what you'll see in the future is that the Bluray vs. HD-DVD war won't matter. The real winner will be Internet ala carte providers, who give the consumers what they want, when they want it. Sony shouldn't fear HD-DVD. They should fear Apple iTunes.

Re:LG will win with dual format players

[MBCook]

I have mod points and I figured this would be a good discussion, but I'll reply to you instead.

First, dual format players CAN'T WIN the war. They are not a format. Even if everyone gets a dual format player for free from the government tomorrow, consumers will still buy more of one format than the other until people stop making one format. Dual format PLAYERS may win the PLAYER WAR, but the disc format war has no real hybrids right now.

Second, these discussions constantly suppose that someone will win. I've seen one comment so far that I agree with: by the time these things reach something akin to a critical mass or become big successes, I think Internet distribution will have won the war or come very close. These things may just be failed. Too early for cheap prices and large HDTV adoption, too late to enjoy a long advantage over internet distribution.