Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Critic Arrested After 6 Years

destinyland writes "Friday police arrested 64-year-old Keith Henson. In 2000 after picketing a Scientology complex, he was arrested as a threat because of a joke Usenet post about "Tom Cruise Missiles." He fled to Canada after being found guilty of "interfering" with a religion, and spent the next 6 years living as a fugitive. Besides being a digital encryption and free speech advocate, he's one of the original Burr-Brown/Texas Instruments researchers and a co-founder of the Space Colony movement."

12 of 1,046 comments (clear)

  1. Previous Discussion by Lev13than · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a vintage /. discussion from 2001 that discusses Hanson's escape to Canada.

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
  2. Re:Tom Cruise Missile by Intron · · Score: 5, Informative

    California hate crime law from the DA's office. ... threatening to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere with another person who is exercising his or her constitutional rights.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  3. Re:Scary by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've read about his case, and from that I'd say the 'stalking' material would be his picketing their compound. Complete with big-ass sign.

    Going by the standards that it takes to get abortion protestors arrested, there's something fishy about the case.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  4. What, no linkage to Operation Clambake? :) by bad_fx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's all the info you need on Scientology

  5. Re:Tom Cruise Missile by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    What I would like to know is how this discussion violates that law. I don't see anything remotely threatening, just a few people having fun talking about a non-existant 'Agent 99' and their fictitious (and humorous!) exploits.

    If you can arrested for this, it makes me wonder how many /.ers have been arrested?

  6. Re:Tom Cruise Missile by jrumney · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at the original Slashdot article from the time of his conviction (linked in one of the comments here), reportedly he was not allowed to use the context of his quotes in his defense. So all the jury saw were a couple of snippets the Scientologists picked out. He probably ruined his case by going on the run, as I can't believe that a higher court would not have overturned the decision on appeal.

  7. Re:I don't get it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    If that so-called "mosque" was allegedly responsible for the deaths of several of their members, then yes, I would say you were justified in picketing.

    He was picketing because of the death of Lisa McPherson. But you know that and now so do those who choose to read the links.

  8. Re:There have to be limits to freedom of religion by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    "religions that are clearly made up. ..." the same cannot be said of any other religion from Christianity to Taoism to neo-paganism."

    Most, if not all, religions are "made up". In some cases, we know when and by whom. Christian Science was made up by Mary Baker Eddy in 1866. Mormonism was made up by Joseph Smith in 1830. Islam was made up by Mohammed around 610. Christianity was more of a group project; most modern doctrine comes from a committee meeting in 325. In 431, there was a another meeting for a feature upgrade, and the Virgin Mary was added.

  9. Ecumenical Councils: the Christian Party Line by spun · · Score: 5, Informative

    You do not know or understand the history of Christianity. There were a series of meetings, known as the Ecumenical Councils, that defined what Christianity is, what it believs and professes, and what it considers heretical. The important ones occuring between 325AD and 1123AD and resolved such questions as whether Jesus was entirely Divine, entirely human, human and divine parts seperated, or human and divine parts united.

    Allmost all Western Christian denominations, as well as Eastern Orthodox accept the decisions of councils 1-7. Catholics, protestants, all of them. That is the Christian party line. Oriental Orthodox churches only accept 1-3; Assyrian Christianity accepts 1-2; Mormonism, Jehova's Witnesses, Unitarians and a few other fringe groups don't accept any of the council's decisions.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  10. Not the usenet posting by KenSeymour · · Score: 4, Informative

    I read in TFM that he was tried and convicted based on his picketing activities outside a Scientology film studio. Since then, I have not been able to get to TFM.

    You can read about it here.

    So he was not arrested for that usenet discussion. He has been sued in civil court
    for publishing Scientology documents. He defended himself and lost, to the tune
    of $75,000. He then declared bankruptcy. At that time, he started repeatedly picketing
    a Scientology film studio.

    When he was convicted and sentenced to six months in jail (for the picketing),
    he chose to flee to Canada because he believed that Scientologists would have him
    killed in prison.

    He applied for political asylum in Canada. After three years, Canada asked him
    to appear in person to hear what the decision was. Fearing deportation, he packed up
    and left Canada the night before.

    So no, usenet posting, in this case, did not get him arrested.

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Not the usenet posting by Skreems · · Score: 4, Informative

      he chose to flee to Canada because he believed that Scientologists would have him killed in prison.
      Given some of their other exploits, I can't say that's completely unfounded...
      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
  11. Re:Scary by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    As others have stated, there's numerous questions about what just went on, the judge squashing the defense, for example, not allowing the rest of the transcript of the conversation involving the missile to be presented.

    Imagine an organization that has no problems lying to authorities, as a group, rehearsing their stories, etc...

    I use abortion protestors as an example because they're frequently the worst behaved protestors out there and have been known to descend into violence.

    In order to match them he'd have to do more than some yelling and handing out pamphlets. Even if he did follow some members home, it's still not to the level that abortion protestors will go to. Heck include PETA in that list of out of control protestors that don't get anything near this level of punishment. They've been known to set up in front of people's houses.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right