Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Critic Arrested After 6 Years

destinyland writes "Friday police arrested 64-year-old Keith Henson. In 2000 after picketing a Scientology complex, he was arrested as a threat because of a joke Usenet post about "Tom Cruise Missiles." He fled to Canada after being found guilty of "interfering" with a religion, and spent the next 6 years living as a fugitive. Besides being a digital encryption and free speech advocate, he's one of the original Burr-Brown/Texas Instruments researchers and a co-founder of the Space Colony movement."

6 of 1,046 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Tom Cruise Missile by Intron · · Score: 5, Informative

    California hate crime law from the DA's office. ... threatening to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere with another person who is exercising his or her constitutional rights.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  2. Re:Scary by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've read about his case, and from that I'd say the 'stalking' material would be his picketing their compound. Complete with big-ass sign.

    Going by the standards that it takes to get abortion protestors arrested, there's something fishy about the case.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  3. What, no linkage to Operation Clambake? :) by bad_fx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's all the info you need on Scientology

  4. Re:Tom Cruise Missile by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    What I would like to know is how this discussion violates that law. I don't see anything remotely threatening, just a few people having fun talking about a non-existant 'Agent 99' and their fictitious (and humorous!) exploits.

    If you can arrested for this, it makes me wonder how many /.ers have been arrested?

  5. Re:Tom Cruise Missile by jrumney · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at the original Slashdot article from the time of his conviction (linked in one of the comments here), reportedly he was not allowed to use the context of his quotes in his defense. So all the jury saw were a couple of snippets the Scientologists picked out. He probably ruined his case by going on the run, as I can't believe that a higher court would not have overturned the decision on appeal.

  6. Ecumenical Councils: the Christian Party Line by spun · · Score: 5, Informative

    You do not know or understand the history of Christianity. There were a series of meetings, known as the Ecumenical Councils, that defined what Christianity is, what it believs and professes, and what it considers heretical. The important ones occuring between 325AD and 1123AD and resolved such questions as whether Jesus was entirely Divine, entirely human, human and divine parts seperated, or human and divine parts united.

    Allmost all Western Christian denominations, as well as Eastern Orthodox accept the decisions of councils 1-7. Catholics, protestants, all of them. That is the Christian party line. Oriental Orthodox churches only accept 1-3; Assyrian Christianity accepts 1-2; Mormonism, Jehova's Witnesses, Unitarians and a few other fringe groups don't accept any of the council's decisions.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton