Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Power Consumption of Modern PCs

Posted by Zonk on from the keep-your-lights-off-to-compensate dept.

janp writes "The power consumption of modern PCs has skyrocketed the past few years. Hardware.Info has done some fairly extensive research on the power usage of various configurations. It turns out the a high-end gaming rig can easily use more than 400 W, and that putting a system in stand-by isn't as saving as you might think. The article has some interesting tips to save on power costs."

3 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. I just did some research on this actually by casualsax3 · · Score: 5, Informative
    A few weeks ago I tested some power supplies to see if it's worth spending $70 on a power supply vs the crappy stock PSU that comes with a lot of cases you can find on NewEgg.

    I used Kill-a-Watt power tester, which can test for a number of things - I used raw amps.

    I tested 4 machines with 5 power supplies in 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 drive configurations. I also took a reading of how much power the systems drew when I powered them on at 4 drives, which shows how efficient the power supplies become under serious load (it takes a good chunk of power to spin up 4 drives)

    The machines were all tested with the same 1x1GB PC5300 RAM, and the same four Western Digital SATA drives. The Intel systems were LGA775 chips on an Asus, and the AMD's were AM2 - also using an Asus motherboard.

    Here are the results (hosted by Voxel.net, so it should hold :) http://newyorkhatesyou.com/Power_Supplies.pdf

    Power supplies tested: http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82 E16817256001

    http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82 E16817371006

    http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82 E16817151022

    http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82 E16817234002

    In a lot of cases the stock power supply uses almost twice as much power.

    In Brooklyn I pay $.19c/kwh, so 1 amp of power can cost around $20 a month - ((volts * amps) / 1000 ) * time (in hours). This means pretty plainly, that the stock PSU here would cost me another $15 per month on my one desktop that I always have on.

    Now if an office switches all of our workstations to one of the three 80% efficient power supplies, we stand to save a few hundred per month. Add to that the fact that these power supplies generally have more stable rails, and they should last longer - and its really a no brainer.

  2. Re:No Kidding by alexhs · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're as 'off' as an ATX can be 'off' with the power supply switch to 'I'. You need a cold boot, but of course you still use some power. It's G2 state

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  3. Re:No Kidding by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, they can actually be fully "shut down".

    On a modern PC with a built-in motherboard you will notice at least one lit LED on the motherboard as long as the PC is plugged in. A tiny amount of power is being provided to the network adapter to listen for "magic packets" which, after being verified, will cause the machine to power up as if you pressed the power switch. This could be from standby or suspend but a cold boot is also possible.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.