Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Harvard Physicists Make Light Dance

Posted by kdawson on from the not-so-fast dept.

tetrikphimvin and others clued us to the latest work by Harvard's Lene Vestergaard Hau, being published today in the journal Nature. The NYTimes has a good layman's overview of how Hau's team encoded a light beam in a clump of atoms and later reconstituted it elsewhere. The Harvard Gazette offers additional details, a photo, and video links.

5 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. One Bad Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Harvard Physicists Make Light Dance
    Then they slowly loaded their six shooters while chewing on a half burnt cigar and make it dance again. They then told light to leave town or it would be pushing up roses. The Harvard townspeople danced joyously and there was much rejoicing.
  2. DDR Lights... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stop playing Dance Dance Revolution and get back to work! There's nothing in the research contract about getting physical on the job!

  3. Meanwhile by roguegramma · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile, in Russia, light makes physicists dance.

    --
    Hey don't blame me, IANAB
  4. Re:So, if you walk next to stopped light... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 5, Funny
    If you say "IANAP" in your post it gives you a license to say whatever you like about physics. Here's an example:

    IANAP but I think that when virtual particles interact in a magnetic field then in the frame of reference of a photon the wavefunction collapse allows faster than light communication except when in violation of the second law of thermodynamics.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  5. Frame of reference by DAtkins · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hee hee... that's funny, despite the fact that it's wrong.

    Frame of reference is an idea that actually had it's beginnings in Einstein's work. The idea being, can a person determine the absolute velocity of [something]. For example, from the frame of reference of the earth, my car goes 65 miles per hour. From the frame of reference of the sun, my car goes 2.9 km/s (because the earth moves that fast around the sun.

    Why is this important? Well, Einstein used this to question why the speed of light seemed constant despite your frame of reference. On a ball of rock orbiting the sun at 2.9 km/s, the speed of light is c. On the surface of the sun (which has no orbital velocity in comparison to the earth), the speed of light is still c. From the frame of reference of the center of the galaxy (where the sun has extremely high relative velocity - which I'm too lazy to look up) the speed of light is still c.

    Which means that, either the speed of light somehow knows how fast you are going and adjusts itself (which is, of course, retarded) or there is something about spacetime that makes it seem that way. Hence the general theory of relativity was developed to explain it. (Which, in case you are curious, states that the ruler that you are using lenghtens or shortens depending on your "frame of reference")

    So, it's actually quite important.