Cosmic Rays and Global Warming
Overly Critical Guy writes "The former editor of New Scientist has written an article in the TimesOnline suggesting that cosmic rays may affect global climate. The author criticizes the UN's recent global warming report, noting several underreported trends it doesn't account for, such as increasing sea-ice in the Southern Ocean. He describes an experiment by Henrik Svensmark showing a relation between atmospheric cloudiness and atomic particles coming in from exploded stars. In the basement of the Danish National Space Center in 2005, Svensmark's team showed that electrons from cosmic rays caused cloud condensation. Svensmark's scenario apparently predicts several unexplained temperature trends from the warmer trend of the 20th century to the temporary drop in the 1970s, attributed to changes in the sun's magnetic field affecting the amount of cosmic rays entering the atmosphere."
....then he discovered he could encourage them to join the army and send them to Iraq
I don't therefore I'm not.
Why did they arrest him? What did it gain them?
More whores or virgins? more book sales?
Common, what did it gain them.... bigger dicks?
Do those sort of people still exist today in the corporate world, knocking down good decent people for their own career gains?
Is the church a fraud that has billions of gold hidden in the vatican or hidden alien treasures? Are they really the one true original
one world government neocons? Is the church like the ORI from stargate?
This is the basic human fundamental fight.... individualism vs collectivsm.... the bee hive vs the wasps....
Just let it be, do both, dont kill each other... and lets see how colonizes mars/moon first.... Communists or Capitalists.
Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
If you'd like to do some of the experiments discussed in the article yourself, the EdGCM project has wrapped a NASA global climate model (GCM) in a GUI (OS X and Win). You can add CO2 and/or turn the sun down by a few percent (to measure solar effects) all with a checkbox and a slider. Supercomputers and advanced FORTRAN programmers are no longer necessary to run your own GCM.
Disclaimer: I'm the project developer.
Space and Computers.
Now, I could be missing some data, and if so, by all means correct me, but my current understanding is that the first actual record that we have is from about 24 years after Jesus was to have died, in an AD 64 letter from Tacitus that mentions the Christian cult (his own words.) Josephus mentions Jesus, but as Josephus wasn't even born until AD 37, and was writing in the AD 80's, I think we can agree he had no direct experience. Then Pliny the Elder mentions Jesus and the cult again in AD 100. Also, Jesus, as I understand it, hasn't been described as having "lived about AD 30", he is purported to have lived from about AD 0 or perhaps BC a few to AD 30.
What all this amounts to is evidence of the cult of Christians in the times following (by 3 decades at the closest) when he was reputed to have lived, but not of Jesus himself, no bill for a cross, no records at court of having to reprimand him, no records of him picking up the whips in the temple; Other than the bible itself, which of course we only have components from about AD 300 onwards and so it isn't a reliable historical source, the mentions of Jesus all seem to be about the cult, not the man. Note that I am not in the least saying that very early Christians aren't real; just that there is no particular evidence that supports Jesus himself. He may, of course, have lived anyway - but the evidence doesn't appear to be there to say so.
Given that I am unaware of any records of Jesus, as opposed to records of the Christians - please, if you are aware of any such records, I would like to know about them. Thank you.
It is important to note that were we to be able to establish that Jesus was real, had followers, and so forth, we still have not in any way established that he was the son of a god, or that there is a god. We've simply gone about finding some guy who said so. I can find the guy who established the FSM meme, too. :)
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
There are two references he makes. One is very good contextually, and not disputed as far as I am aware. That's where he says "Ananus... convened the judges of the Sanhedrin and brought before them a man named James, the brother of Jesus who was called the Christ, and certain others. He accused them of having transgressed the law and delivered them up to be stoned." The main one scholars object to is the one where he call Jesus the "messiah" which of course is a very unlikely (or worse, blasphemous) term for a non-Christian jew to use at the time, and also made unlikely by other, contemporaneous reports of Josephus' outlook, which was decidedly non-Christian.
It really is amazing how strongly the thread of presumed "evidence" for Jesus' actuality runs through society. When you go looking, you find basically nothing.
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.