Slashdot Mirror


Intel Squeezes 1.8 TFlops Out of One Processor

Jagdeep Poonian writes "It appears as though Intel has been able to squeeze 1.8 TFlops out of one processor and with a power consumption of 62 watts." The AP version of the story is mostly the same; a more technical examination of TeraScale is also available.

6 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. EIGHTY Cores??? by rwyoder · · Score: 4, Funny

    64 cores should be enough for anybody.

  2. Re:What kinds of apps does this make reasonable? by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it suddenly make previously crappy technologies worthwhile?

    Vista?

    (Sorry, couldn't resist.)

  3. Re:What kinds of apps does this make reasonable? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clippy?

    "It looks like you're writing a five-page essay on the role of the Judicial branch during periods of famine in the late 1850's."

  4. Re:What kinds of apps does this make reasonable? by Intron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, your post made me realize that a sophisticated processor is unnecessary. It's already difficult to tell whether a message is from a human or just a randomly generated string of nonsense.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  5. You won't notice a performance difference... by Dekortage · · Score: 4, Funny

    They've already allocated 40 cores to the RIAA and MPAA for DRM processing, 30 cores to NSA/Homeland Security surveillance of all your computing activities, and 6 cores to combat spam and phishing. In the end, there is no net gain in performance over today's processors. Sorry.

    (tongue firmly planted in cheek)

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  6. About time... by nadamucho · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like Intel finally put the "80" in 80x86.