Slashdot Mirror


Creating a Business in the US on an H1-B Visa?

GnaGnaGna asks: "I've lived in the US for almost a year now and have a full time position with a major American company under an H1-B visa (work visa for foreigners). Besides this job, I also run an increasingly popular website generating AdSense revenues. I am not sure if I am allowed to create a US company (most likely an LLC), under my legal status, and transfer the Adsense profits to my personal bank account or a business bank account. Have my fellow readers faced a similar legal situation or know anything about it?"

103 comments

  1. As I'm sure eveyone else will say by tx_kanuck · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get a lawyer. There is nothing here that can really help you other then moral support.

    --
    Now, if that makes sense to anyone, could you please explain it to me? I think I've confused myself.
    1. Re:As I'm sure eveyone else will say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a lawyer. There is nothing here that can really help you other then moral support.

      I'm not so sure. It might be nice to warn him that he has probably already violated his visa. He really needs to talk to a lawyer before he files his 2006 taxes, since he has to choose between admiting the violation or evading taxes (the first is better). In other words, "Get a lawyer" is the correct advice, but it never hurts to explain why.

  2. Cliff, come on.. by molo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cliff, please explain why this is a good "ask slashdot" question. This is obiously something that should be referred to a lawyer. It is hard to believe that this was the best question you had in the queue.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:Cliff, come on.. by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      It's not worth getting a lawyer if everyone tells you "not a fscking chance!".

    2. Re:Cliff, come on.. by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      While you might find it a bad Ask Slashdot, I for myself am pretty interested in seeing any sensible replies. That is, more sensible than the obligatory "bad question blah blah".

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    3. Re:Cliff, come on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, it isn't worth it when they tell you "Just go home and please let the door hit your ass on the way out!"

    4. Re:Cliff, come on.. by twistedcubic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I wish users could pick the ask slashdot questions. Alas, starting a new site wouldn't work because it won't have the same traffic as slashdot. We lose.

    5. Re:Cliff, come on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is bad for a few reasons. 1) This is all codified in law, so a quick search could probably have found him an answer, 2) This is a legal matter, so unless someone is rolling around /. charging us by the hour, most your answers are going to start with IANAL, 3) There are probably free legal advice numbers that could've answered this question for them with some degree of legal authority, and 4) the question isn't really that open ended since the answer is basically either Yes or No. This question is everything an Ask Slashdot question should not be.

    6. Re:Cliff, come on.. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Actually http://technocrat.net/ not only lets you submit your own story, but it has a decent amount of traffic of very smart people, but not so much that they've ever NOT published a story.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  3. Simple answer. by jpetts · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, you are not allowed to run a business while you are on an H-1B visa. You can be a passive investor in a business ONLY. If you do anything that is regarded as work that would normally be paid, even if you are not remunerated, you break the conditions of your H-1B, and are deportable under 237(a)(1)(C) of the INA. You may not receive anything other than normal shareholder dividends from the company, and you will need to declare them on your IRS return. Any attempt at covert payment through dividends is likely to attract unwelcome attention from the IRS, and possiby the USCIS.

    Lots of people do what you are describing, but it is definitely 100% ILLEGAL, and you will most likely be deported and banned if you are caught.

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    1. Re:Simple answer. by jpetts · · Score: 3, Informative

      Forgot to add this: you CAN work for your company if, and only if the company files an approved H-1B for you as an employee of that company as well. You can have multiple H-1Bs: no problem there. However, there are lots of hoops to jump through, and it is not easy. Not sure exactly what it takes, but if you are bringing in significant amounts of cash, why not hire an immigration attorney? See the AILA web site for more detaisl.

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    2. Re:Simple answer. by kakapo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had two H1-Bs for several years, one for my day job and one for some consulting I was doing on the side. It was not that hard - the first H1-B was for a job at a large university, and these are routinely approved. The second was for work with a small start-up spun off by another university, and that was tougher, since it was a small firm and they had not filed an H1-B petition before and they retained a very good immigration lawyer (who I then hired to do my green card application a year or so later).

      The issue here is that a company with one part-time employee (ie the one you are thinking of registering) may have a hard job getting an H1-B application approved.

      I would talk to a lawyer, but you *might* be safe if you register the company in your own country, and not to the US -- Google will pay out to other countries??

    3. Re:Simple answer. by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Okay, so it's not something you can do in America. But if it's a web based business, why not take the steps to form a corporation in your home country, get a relative to help you with the paper work, and run it from here? That way you're running a business in that country and not here. Have the money go to an account in a bank there. That way if you can't stay, you don't lose anything and in the meantime, might make some good contacts that can help you when you're no longer in the USA.

      I'm not familiar with the H-1B, so it's also possible the terms restrict you from holding positions in your country while working here. I don't know and I'm not sure, but I thought I'd make the suggestion.

    4. Re:Simple answer. by hauntingthunder · · Score: 1

      Its also arguably Gross misconduct and could well get you the sack (fired with cause) from your real job.
      I doubt many employers would look kindly on there employees having outside jobs espesialy if you useing company resources to run said company.

      --
      You will never get to heaven with an Ak 47... But A Zu 30 is good for Low Flying Cherubim
    5. Re:Simple answer. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Still need to talk to a laywer - where's the tax liability?

    6. Re:Simple answer. by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

      He would then become an illegal immigrant. While he may incorporate in his home country, he's still doing the work in the United States - so to be legal he would either need to be on an L1 intracompany transferee visa for the new company he incorporates back home, or on another H1-B visa for this new line of work.

      The conditions as I understand them on the H1-B is that if you so much as mow a friend's lawn as a favour, you've just become an illegal immigrant. *ANY* work other than as specified by the visa is illegal, paid or not. It's not likely that you'll get busted and deported for mowing a friend's lawn. However, since you have to report your *worldwide* income to the IRS, the fact that you've just reported income for work that wasn't allowed by your H1-B visa will be a dead giveaway you've been working illegally. If you don't report this income, then not only have you worked illegally, you're now also guilty of tax evasion!

      The questioner really ought to ask an immigration lawyer. But at the end of the day, unless he gets permission from the INS to do this work, if he wants to remain legal he should stop making money off his website now.

    7. Re:Simple answer. by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Yes, he still needs to talk to a lawyer, but if the income is from a business in his country and goes to an account in his country, and if he spends it there instead of here, then there won't be tax issue, will there?

    8. Re:Simple answer. by Malc · · Score: 1

      No idea. I've know of Canadians who live in Canada and work in the US (commute across the border every day) who are taxed in both countries. I lived in Canada working for an American company without ever visiting the US, and only had a liability in Canada (treaty exemption).

    9. Re:Simple answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally, if the IRS and INS/BCIS/USCIS ever get together and look at your adsense income, you may be deported just for that. Get a lawyer.

    10. Re:Simple answer. by quoll · · Score: 1

      OK, this answer is pretty straightforward. How about spinning it a little differently:

      I'm on an E3 visa. This is almost identical to an H1B, only my wife is entitled to work as well (she can work for anyone, and has a funky little holographic card to prove it). She wants to start her own business in a similar way to what's described here. Would that be allowed? We thought it would be.

      Yes, we'll talk to a lawyer, but most haven't heard of the E3 yet, and I want to waste as little money as possible.

    11. Re:Simple answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I write software for companies dealing with immigration law, and that handles quite a lot of issues with the various visas. I can guarantee you that if the immigration lawyer you are speaking to hasn't heard of the E3 then you should walk out and not pay them a penny as they are failing to keep up with what's going on in immigration. What makes the E3 special is that you can only get an E3 if you are from a treaty country (same as E1-E2 visas), and you need to be a specialty worker. The E3 grants your spouse the right to work, without specifying who your spouse may work for. My understanding of this was that this visa allows for the spouse to work in any job regardless of their own education or abilities. The rules and language regarding E3's is based on and taken from both the E1-E2 visa and the H1-B which makes it highly likely that neither you nor your wife may start your own business. You should still consult with an immigration attorney, the attorney at the company that hired you should be able to answer this question in a couple of minutes and typically won't cost you anything.

    12. Re:Simple answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What makes the E3 special is that you can only get an E3 if you are from a treaty country

      The E3 Visa is only available to Australian nationals.

    13. Re:Simple answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's our kickback for allowing the US to lock up the only token white guy Guantanamo Bay. Doing it with a US citizen they weren't even willing to try. The Brits objected and got theirs out. So we've let a guy rot in a stupidly harsh jail for 5 years with no trial. A black period in our history :(

      It may be for the 1400 troops we've got in Iraq, but everyone assumes it for David Hicks..

  4. Sounds like you're already breaking the law.. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    I recommend that you use the time you have in the US to woo some VC capital.. maybe even sell your website to interested parties. If you get busted, so what? The INS will probably not renew your H1B in any case.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. Your business may enable your leisure time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might just go to USA prison for upto 5 years.

    From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_evasion

    Internal Revenue Code section 7201[13]:

    Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

  6. As I'm sure evey atheist will say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Get a lawyer. There is nothing here that can really help you other then moral support."

    Sorry. Not even that.

  7. Believe it or not by stox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On an H1B, it is illegal for you to form a business that you are an active investor in. This is part of the "contract" you enter into to become an H1B. However, if you were an illegal alien, it would be just fine. For a prime example of this, check into the history of Philippe Kahn, founder of Borland Software Corporation, creators of Turbo Pascal.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Believe it or not by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      On an H1B, it is illegal for you to form a business that you are an active investor in. This is part of the "contract" you enter into to become an H1B. However, if you were an illegal alien, it would be just fine. For a prime example of this, check into the history of Philippe Kahn, founder of Borland Software Corporation, creators of Turbo Pascal.

      It isn't really so unbelievable. For all the huffing and puffing over illegal immigration, the crime itself is relatively minor. That's one reason I have to laugh everytime a dittohead pops a vein about how illegal aliens are criminals just as bad as murders and rapists.

      Overstaying a visa (which is how about 40% of illegal immigrants get here) is not even a criminal offense, not even a misdemeanor, just a civil offense like a speeding ticket. The guys who sneak across the border without ever getting a visa in the first place are only guilty of a misdemeanor.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Believe it or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theere takin' are jaawbs!!!

    3. Re:Believe it or not by Iamthefallen · · Score: 1

      Overstaying a visa (which is how about 40% of illegal immigrants get here)

      And thanks to the sluggish immigration system, a large part of the legal immigrants end up doing so as well.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    4. Re:Believe it or not by joshetc · · Score: 1

      And the march on DC was an invasion of a foreign army on our nations capital, what type of crime is that?

    5. Re:Believe it or not by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Overstaying a visa (which is how about 40% of illegal immigrants get here) is not even a criminal offense, not even a misdemeanor, just a civil offense like a speeding ticket.

      A speeding ticket is a class B misdemeanor. Look it up. A "civil offense" is something you can get sued by a private individual for, a "criminal offense" is something you get a subpoena from a court officer, with bail, court appointment, fine, or jail time for. Criminal offenses are divided into midemeanors or felonies- the first you get a fine for, the second you get jail time for.

      Most states don't have the jail space for illegal aliens, so in the past 30 years, even though it's officially listed as a FELONY, it's become in practice a MISDEMEANOR. But it's more like driving without a license than like a speeding ticket- if you commit another offense that is more serious, you CAN be deported for being an illegal alien (sometimes. I should point out that there is a man in Hillsboro, OR who is an illegal alien and it took 4 DUIIs with a manslaugter charge on the third to get him a deportation order- and right now he's out on bail and probably still driving without a license because he just can't take the hint).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Believe it or not by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1
      A speeding ticket is a class B misdemeanor. Look it up.

      I have looked it up. You are wrong. Here's one source out of thousands:

      A traffic infraction is a civil violation such as your basic speeding ticket.
      DUI & Traffic Crimes
      Most states don't have the jail space for illegal aliens, so in the past 30 years, even though it's officially listed as a FELONY, it's become in practice a MISDEMEANOR.

      One of thousands of cites that disagree with you:

      mere status as an alien, or even as an illegal alien, may only be a civil violation of the Act and thus would not be a sufficient basis for an arrest.
      Opinion of the NY Attorney General


      Next time you want to prove someone wrong, you should actually check your facts by posting them in your rebuttal. Otherwise you end up wasting everyone's time.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:Believe it or not by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I have looked it up. You are wrong. Here's one source out of thousands:

      Wow, I knew the East Coast was rather relaxed by Pacific Northwest standards, but I didn't know it was THAT relaxed! It said very clearly on my last speeding ticket that it was a Class B misdemeanor- no wonder people are surprised by Oregon's trafic ticket fines (which start at $88 for minor offenses like a light out, and can easly exeed $2000 for driving 100 in a 65 zone).

      One of thousands of cites that disagree with you:

      A misdemeanor does not require an arrest; in Oregon it's much more likely to be a cite and release ticket with a fine and a court date (and if you're pleading guilty, you can just send in the fine before the court date, or even plead by letter). Only if you don't respond and don't make your court date are you guilty of contempt of court- necessitating an arrest.

      And as for the NY Attorney General- well, he's not federal is he? NOR does he have anything to say about immigration, which is a FEDERAL offense, which in practice, is nothing more than a cite-and-realese, albeit release in country of origin.

      Next time you want to prove someone wrong, you should actually check your facts by posting them in your rebuttal. Otherwise you end up wasting everyone's time.

      It did turn out to be interesting though- should get you a positive mod. But the way illegal immigration is treated in this country shows an intense disrespect for rule of law in general- but what else do you expect from the Bush Administration?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Believe it or not by Samrobb · · Score: 1

      Next time you want to prove someone wrong, you should actually check your facts by posting them in your rebuttal. Otherwise you end up wasting everyone's time.

      And next tome you want to cite something, please don't yank a phrase out of context to prove your point. The full text of the conclusion of the "Opinion of the NY Attorney General" that you cited states (emphasis mine):

      New York State law enforcement officials may make arrests without warrants for criminal violations of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act. However, mere status as an alien, or even as an illegal alien, may only be a civil violation of the Act and thus would not be a sufficient basis for an arrest. For a valid arrest, the officer must have probable cause to believe that the person has committed a criminal violation of the INA, such as illegal entry into the United States, and not merely a civil violation, such as illegal presence in the country.

      So both you, and the original poster, are wrong. There are INA violations that are a criminal offense; the opinion makes one of those situations (illegal entry into the US) explicitly clear. If you had bothered to cite the full conclusion, that much would have been obvious. However, the conclusion makes the point that (as far as the NYAG is concerned, at least), there are INA violations that may only be considered a civil offense. Based on the opinion, this seems to include the "Sorry, my visa expired" category.

      So the presence of a foreign national in the US may either be permitted, or it may be a civil offense, or it may be a criminal offense, depending on the circumstances. Clear?

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    9. Re:Believe it or not by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Wow, I knew the East Coast was rather relaxed by Pacific Northwest standards

      Try WA, CA, IL, HI, and TX as non-east coast states where speeding tickets are civil. I am sure there are plenty more, those are just the ones where I lived and looked it up at the time.

      And as for the NY Attorney General- well, he's not federal is he? NOR does he have anything to say about immigration, which is a FEDERAL offense, which in practice, is nothing more than a cite-and-realese, albeit release in country of origin.

      Would you PLEASE back up your claim with a citation that shows overstaying a visa is a federal FELONY as you originally claimed. You are so confident that you doubt the word of the attorney general of a state with one of the highest numbers of illegal immigrants, you must have some basis for it.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:Believe it or not by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Go back and read my initial post before you go on about yanking a phrase out of context. The context you provided is exactly in sync with my initial disputed claim that overstaying your visa is a civil offense.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    11. Re:Believe it or not by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      While you are at it, go back and read Marxist Hacker's claim that being an illegal alien is a FELONY - by your own words, the context of the NY AG's opinion does not validate that claim either.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    12. Re:Believe it or not by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Would you PLEASE back up your claim with a citation that shows overstaying a visa is a federal FELONY as you originally claimed.

      Well, I'm not real sure it is. But that's how the 1986 Amnesty deal was sold to the American citizenry- that they were going to let a bunch of people become citizens, and in return, from here on out they were going to arrest & deport every new illegal immigrant. Ok, after researching, I seem to have had it wrong. Giving an illegal alien a job was what was supposed to have become a felony (this has never been enforced). Also, committing a felony or three misdemeanors while overstaying your visa or other illegal immigration status is a felony requiring instant deportation (also never enforced).

      Now you tell me- is it right to break a law merely because it is unenforced? Is it moral in your mind to enter a home and steal from it's inhabitants, while claiming "it's just a civil offense"?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:Believe it or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the time, the crime was "being British" but we've had a while to get over it. (Some German things came up and, well, everybody hates the Huns so bygones were bygones.)

    14. Re:Believe it or not by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Now you tell me- is it right to break a law merely because it is unenforced?

      Hello? Who said it is unenforced? You just admitted that it isn't even a misdemeanor, it is a civil violation aka not a crime.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    15. Re:Believe it or not by Samrobb · · Score: 1

      I stand by my statement - you're both wrong (Marxist Hacker more blatantly so, but still...) In your original post, you wrote:

      Overstaying a visa (which is how about 40% of illegal immigrants get here) is not even a criminal offense, not even a misdemeanor, just a civil offense like a speeding ticket. The guys who sneak across the border without ever getting a visa in the first place are only guilty of a misdemeanor.

      The last part of your initial argument there (which I've emphasized) is incorrect. I pointed that out using the references you cited. Entering the country illegally is a criminal offense, and it's classification as misdemeanor or felony depends on the circumstances. As the NYAG document points out, "Federal and local enforcement have identical purposes--the prevention of the misdemeanor or felony of illegal entry." Entering the US without a visa may be a misdemeanor, or it may be a felony. I'm personally not aware of what the difference is, but obviously, the NYAG thought that it was important to point out to NY law enforcement that being in the country illegally does not automatically mean that an individual is a felon.

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    16. Re:Believe it or not by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Hello? Who said it is unenforced?

      Mainly guards at the border- who aren't even issued AMMO anymore. The Congress, which over and over refuses to adequately fund ICE enough to track people on visas to begin with and deport them when their visa runs out. The 200 prisoners of ICE sitting on their buts in an Idaho Jail, because they've figured out if they never fill out the form listing Country of Origin, ICE doesn't have the resources to find out where they came from, and thus can't deport them. The poor LEGAL immigrants who wait years, decades for a visa to move here, because ICE is too busy running around with inadequate information to actually process immigrant and permanent resident visas.

      And you are so special you want to act unfairly and jump ahead of them in line? What case makes YOU so selfish to get special treatment in a land that values equality under the law above all else?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    17. Re:Believe it or not by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Mainly guards at the border- who aren't even issued AMMO anymore.

      Sounds like a damn good thing too. We would never stand for the police shooting people who commit other misdemeanors - if the cops shot a shoplifter or someone with an open bottle in public, that cop would be fired right away. As long as illegal entry into the country is classified as a misdemeanor, we had better not be shooting at them. And don't give me any silliness about drugs, because the DEA has plenty of ammo.

      And you are so special you want to act unfairly and jump ahead of them in line? What case makes YOU so selfish to get special treatment in a land that values equality under the law above all else?

      This country does no such thing. Equality by money is what rules. Other countries may be worse, but we have rich man's justice here just like anywhere else. If enforcing that fairness really was so important to the US, then the penalties would be way worse than a civil fine or misdemeanor. Life ain't fair, if we shared a land border with the rest of the world, you can bet your bippy plenty of those legal immigrants would be trying to take advantage of the situation too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    18. Re:Believe it or not by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a damn good thing too. We would never stand for the police shooting people who commit other misdemeanors - if the cops shot a shoplifter or someone with an open bottle in public, that cop would be fired right away. As long as illegal entry into the country is classified as a misdemeanor, we had better not be shooting at them. And don't give me any silliness about drugs, because the DEA has plenty of ammo.

      The DEA isn't on the border- another deriliction of duty. The country that cannont control it's own border, cannot enforce the law, is not a country, to paraphrase the last President who signed an Amnesty bill- an Amnesty bill that was supposed to be followed up with SRICT border controls, including killing those who don't do it legally.

      This country does no such thing. Equality by money is what rules.

      That's not what our Declaration of Independance says. EVERYBODY is supposed to be equal under the law here, that's what Rule of Law means. If you can't live under rule of law, you should be exiled. And that goes for homegrown Americans too.

      Other countries may be worse, but we have rich man's justice here just like anywhere else. If enforcing that fairness really was so important to the US, then the penalties would be way worse than a civil fine or misdemeanor.

      Exactly. The agreement in 1986 was that this would be the LAST amnesty ever- that all illegals would be deported and the borders locked down and mined. That didn't happen. This is in violation of our Constitution, little better than an invasion. Would China put up with say, North Vietnam sending them all of their criminals? I doubt it.

      Life ain't fair, if we shared a land border with the rest of the world, you can bet your bippy plenty of those legal immigrants would be trying to take advantage of the situation too.

      350,000 legal immigrants come from Mexico every year following the law. What makes you more deserving than them?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  8. Oblig. South Park by sokoban · · Score: 0

    Hey tuk ar jerbs!!

    Und naw hey tuk ar adsens!!

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:Oblig. South Park by halsver · · Score: 1

      Sokoban, I've determined the only way to stop the aliens from taking our "adsens" is to all have gay sex until all the aliens go away.

      Please show your support and sign up for the man-orgy below.

      --
      Roughly half my comments are never submitted. You may be reading the better half...
  9. But what should I know first? by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get a lawyer. What should people reading this topic know before they walk into the lawyer's office and the clock begins to tick in order to make the best use of the time that they are paying for?
    1. Re:But what should I know first? by lewp · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Hey Mr. Lawyer Man. I'm an H1-B worker, and I was wondering if I can start some sort of company here in the US?"

      Easy enough. Should take about five minutes and a couple hundred dollars. Fucking lawyers.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    2. Re:But what should I know first? by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      Ask the law firm attached to the big American company you work for.

      That's what I do?

  10. Standard response by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You have asked a question that can only be answered by a lawyer. While reading the answers to your question, you should be aware that:

    [x] It is likely that many /. readers have been in this situation
    [ ] That question is not applicable to geeks.
    [ ] Wow. Who would ever wonder about that.

    The consequences of following /. advice could be:

    [ ] Incarceration in a Federal Supermax Prison
    [ ] Incarceration in a regular prison
    [ ] Incarceration in "country-club" for white-collar criminals.
    [ ] Large fines
    [ ] Small fines
    [X] Deportation.

    Further consequences could be:
    [ ] You may have to register your address for the rest of your life.
    [X] You may never be able to [legally] enter the United States again.
    [ ] You may be subject to the ridicule of your peers.
    [ ] You may become an international pariah.
    [ ] Find a new career. Toxic waste disposal sounds good.

    Best of luck in your future endeavors!

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Standard response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [X] You may never be able to [legally] enter the United States again.

      Well, unless you have loved ones there, who would care about that?

    2. Re:Standard response by DoktorTomoe · · Score: 1

      > [ ] Incarceration in "country-club" for white-collar criminals.

      Sheez, you forgot the "federal pound-in-the-ass prison"

    3. Re: Standard Response by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      Here's a golden opportunity for the ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) people to earn their pay. Secondly, public policy has permitted certain sectors of the US economy to hyperinflate, namely housing, EDUCATION and medicine. If education is allowed to hyperinflate at current rates, one will see fewer and fewer native-borns going into those occupations that are being filled by H1B visaholders.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  11. Worse... by Xenographic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you notice that the person who submitted this was named "GnaGnaGna"? I'm not convinced it's even a real question.

    1. Re:Worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touche Mr.Graphic

    2. Re:Worse... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Did you notice that the person who submitted this was named "GnaGnaGna"? I'm not convinced it's even a real question.

      That's the account for Mr. Stalman's doo-wop quartet.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  12. IANAL but I think it should be legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, and this is something that you should be talking about with an immigration lawyer.

    However, I believe it should be legal.

    1. It is legal to do this even if you don't have a visa and are not living in the U.S. You can open a bank account (some banks allow foreigners to open an account). You can own a website (Most registrars have no problem with this). Sending the adsense revenue to the bank account is trivial.
    2. The legality question arises because the H1B provisions specifically state that you need authorization from the INS (whatever it is called now) to take up additional part time or full time jobs. If I'm right, it defines job in a way not to include business revenue - this is the part for which you would need to talk to an immigration laywer.
    3. I don't think you need a business license, although it is possible for a foreigner to obtain one - may vary from state to state.
    4. Whatever be the case, if you are living in the US, you must pay the income tax.

    In short, the question you should be asking your lawyer is, why is it illegal to this with a H1B visa, especially since it is legal to do this without any visa?

  13. Why a US Corporation? by Kaenneth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could you perhaps register the business in your home country instead?

    1. Re:Why a US Corporation? by bytesex · · Score: 1

      Maybe his home country is Nigeria ? They never seem to have problems funneling money in and out of Nigeria, now do they ?

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  14. What the INA actually says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Many of these comments bear no relation to the law. First, consult an attorney as this is a grey area in many ways and your case sounds somewhat problematic.

    IANAL, but in my experience living through this, an H1B can be an executive of of a company, as well as a passive or active investor (board member) as long as you file for an H1 visa that covers that job description for that company. It needn't be a fulltime H visa either, although you may have trouble convincing the USCIS that such a key role can be done part-time. I personally held a fulltime visa for an executive position with one company and a concurrent visa of a few days a month to be a boardmember of a second company which I also owned a large chunk of. Both visas were approved by the USCIS with no problems.

    The requirements in 8 CFR 214.2 (h)(1) are that (a) it is a bonafide company with real money to employ you at a prevailing wage and (b) the job is a specialty technical occupation. Some applications for president/CEO roles are tougher because the technical nature of such needs to be documented, but it is certainly possible. Obviously US citizen should incorporate the company and file for your visa, but they can be a minority owner.

    Note that this does not apply if you wish to file for a greencard, since there are very strict USCIS guidelines based on case law that state you cannot file for a greencard via a corporation in which you hold a large stock position or a founding role if you are unlikely to be replaced by a US citizen. (Google "Matter of Modular Container Systems" for more info on that whole ball of wax).

  15. "incriminating" question? by _7miracles · · Score: 1

    > I also run an increasingly popular website generating AdSense revenues

    4 digits figure? :-) I'm not implying anything -- still, taking into account some "invisible intonations" and the way the question was asked -- Google is expected to shutdown their AdSense program for websites specifically involved in illegal warez and porno activities. The last time I checked the statistics the lion portion of Internet visitors were there.

    P.S.: What if the person holds his future lawyer in stock, and would like to learn from personal experience of others? After all, it cannot be denied that the portion of slashdotters used to live outside USA or with H1B working visa is not that insignificant. Personally, I know at least dozen H1B'ers who keep slashdot.org as home page in their browser.

  16. offshore it? by deadweight · · Score: 1

    If you open an account in country X and the web site is hosted in country Y, where neither X nor Y = USA, is there any real chance of getting busted?

  17. Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That's one reason I have to laugh everytime a dittohead pops a vein about how illegal aliens are criminals just as bad as murders and rapists.

    The illegal status is one issue, but the bigger problem is the crime represented by the illegal population.

    On average, illegal immigrants kill 25 American citizens every day. That's more than soldiers dying in Iraq - that's 12-14 times the number of people dead since 9/11 than died on 9/11.

    So, what's really a bigger problem, terrorism or illegal immigration?

    Or are 9,000 deaths a year not really a problem worth 'popping a vein' over? Maybe when it happens to your family the focus will change.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On average, illegal immigrants kill 25 American citizens every day. That's more than soldiers dying in Iraq - that's 12-14 times the number of people dead since 9/11 than died on 9/11. So, what's really a bigger problem, terrorism or illegal immigration?

      The real problem is drunk driving. Follow your link and read how those Americans are kill.

    2. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting name "mcgonigle". I'm guessing that it's a European name, no? No matter - it's not native North American. So... that would mean that your ancestors were immigrants, no?

      I'm betting that your ancestors did not file forms with the natives of the day, and would have been considered "illegal" by the original landholders.

      And, what did your ancestors do [either directly, or indirectly by withholding aid]? Kill most of the natives. Not .00000008% each day.

      If you would spend less time looking down your nose, you might see that there are very few people who's ancestry can be traced 100% to native North America.

      You, sir, are a troll.

    3. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      >> On average, illegal immigrants kill 25 American citizens every day.

      So you're saying we should let in 25 immigrants each day to replace them.

    4. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      On average, illegal immigrants kill 25 American citizens every day. That's more than soldiers dying in Iraq - that's 12-14 times the number of people dead since 9/11 than died on 9/11.

      Those numbers are made up by people with an interest in skewing the results. There is no formal statistically sound basis for those claims. But you are quoting a fear-mongering politician, what do you expect?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting name "mcgonigle". I'm guessing that it's a European name, no? ...
      You, sir, are a troll. I think that he might be referring to this bloke:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_McGonagall
      "...comically renowned as one of the worst poets in the English language."

    6. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Those numbers are made up by people with an interest in skewing the results. There is no formal statistically sound basis for those claims. But you are quoting a fear-mongering politician, what do you expect?

      As I understand it the government has been prevented from keeping a close tally on this, so the numbers given are the best available data. Even if they're not exactly right it's still a problem. Even if it's off by an order of magnitude (900 instead of 9000) it's still a problem.

      Let's say it is off by an order of magnitude - is it worth 900 citizens' lives to get lawns cut cheaply? I won't make that trade-off.

      The funny thing about statistics is their ability to hide gross atrocities. If someone were to call '900' acceptable on paper I doubt he could sit in a chair and watch each of them happen without 'popping a vein' as the OP said.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      As I understand it the government has been prevented from keeping a close tally on this

      Yeah, prevented in the same way that atheism is a religion.

      so the numbers given are the best available data

      Crap is crap, it doesn't matter if it came out of a prince or a pauper, it is still just as useless.

      Even if they're not exactly right it's still a problem. Even if it's off by an order of magnitude (900 instead of 9000) it's still a problem.

      No, not really. Given the estimates of the number of illegal aliens in the US (10-20 million), 900 deaths, half of them by traffic accident puts them between just at and half the national average murder rate of 420 per 10M and significantly better than the 1,500 per 10M national average of traffic deaths per capita. Those numbers don't even account for manslaughter, just murders and traffic deaths. Making them significantly better than the average legal resident.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by avronius · · Score: 1
      Maybe you should re-evaluate the story here http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/9201 .html

      Using the numbers [from the same data] it would appear that you discount the 75% of Americans who are killed by non-immigrants as "OK"?

      From comments on the article that I've linked:

      Based on King's numbers, the vast majority of murders in the United States are caused by non-immigrants. So either we let in more immigrants--thus watering down the murder rate--or we start getting rid of bona fide U.S. citizens.
    9. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Using the numbers [from the same data] it would appear that you discount the 75% of Americans who are killed by non-immigrants as "OK"?

      Of course not. It doesn't follow that if you remove the illegal immigrants those people would be killed anyway. There's no daily quota on murder.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should re-evaluate the story here http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/9201 .html [thecarpetb...report.com]

      Sorry, I hit submit by accident.... reading this article I see they're equating arrested murderers with murders. Those are two different numbers. If the murderer isn't caught he's not in the statistics. A good argument they could make is proving the immigration status of of those who weren't caught.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, prevented in the same way that atheism is a religion.

      I'm going to have to give you that picture of the bunny with the pancake on his head. But to elucidate, it's clear that those in charge of the executive branch don't want to stem the tide of illegal immigrants and they set policy. Far be it from politicians to set policy that supports their positions.

      Crap is crap, it doesn't matter if it came out of a prince or a pauper, it is still just as useless.

      Numbers with error bars are better than putting one's thumb to the wind. It's better to proceed with best available data rather than throw up ones' hands complaining about the confidence interval and declaring progress impossible.

      No, not really. Given the estimates of the number of illegal aliens in the US (10-20 million), 900 deaths, half of them by traffic accident puts them between just at and half the national average murder rate of 420 per 10M and significantly better than the 1,500 per 10M national average of traffic deaths per capita. Those numbers don't even account for manslaughter, just murders and traffic deaths. Making them significantly better than the average legal resident.

      You seem to be under the impression that if there weren't illegal immigrants Americans would have to do the killing instead. There's no quota on murder. There might be some credence on the drunk driving side, as presumably those people were driving to fulfill an economic need (if they were on the job). At that it would be interesting to know if there's a study comparing drunk driving rates of the two populations - typically education and socioeconomic status are two indicators on those kinds of scenarios.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    12. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to give you that picture of the bunny with the pancake on his head. But to elucidate, it's clear that those in charge of the executive branch don't want to stem the tide of illegal immigrants and they set policy. Far be it from politicians to set policy that supports their positions.

      Aethism is no more a religion than not collecting stamps is a hobby. In other words there has been no law passed, no directive made, no active intervention that PREVENTS the collection of these statistics. Every response you have to that will be based on your opaque assertion of transparency.

      Numbers with error bars are better than putting one's thumb to the wind

      Hello? Do you even understand basic statistics? If any of those studies even published error bars, they would be no more meaningful than the baseline numbers. You can not create valid information from bad data.

      You seem to be under the impression that if there weren't illegal immigrants Americans would have to do the killing instead.

      So, your argument boils down to - illegal immigrants are not saints, so they should burn at the stake. That same argument can be applied to any population, illegal or not, and is a direct path to a police state. Just look at the correlation between men under 30 and the murder rate, much much higher than the average, let's lock them for 10 years if they get a speeding ticket or are busted for littering. Hell, let's lock up every man for the most trivial offense because after all, there is no quota on murder, if those damn dirty speeders were in jail they wouldn't be killin anyone.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    13. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      So, your argument boils down to - illegal immigrants are not saints, so they should burn at the stake.

      Wow! That you would equate being denied illegal entry to a country and burning at the stake is simply astounding. Enforcing immigration law is not a path to a police state, it's the rule of law which is the basis for our stable, productive society. There are plenty of anything-goes societies available on Earth if that's preferable - Somalia is especially good since it doesn't have a functioning government. Geez, even Mexico jails and kills illegal immigrants coming over its southern border.

      And yes, immigrants are held to a higher standard than the average citizen. At least until an immigrant is naturalized he's got to be on his best behavior. And this is for a reason - we want the best of the best as our immigrants. Check out some of the immigrants who participate here on Slashdot - they are the best of the best. Smart, upstanding, and fantastic people. They make America better, and we welcome them with open arms.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    14. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      That you would equate being denied illegal entry to a country and burning at the stake is simply astounding.

      That you would equate illegal entry to a country with murder and vehicular manslaughter is simply astounding. See my original post about popping a vein because you just did.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    15. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That you would equate illegal entry to a country with murder and vehicular manslaughter is simply astounding.

      So when I say that illegal immigrants kill Americans, that's astounding but when you say stopping them is "burning them at the stake" that's, what, reasonable?

      See my original post about popping a vein because you just did.

      See, what I did was point out a logical non-sequitor in your argument. What you just did was an ad hominem attack. If I was interested in that I would have gone right for the link to a socialist periodical in your .sig, but I guess I was expecting a civil debate. Silly me.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    16. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      So when I say that illegal immigrants kill Americans, that's astounding but when you say stopping them is "burning them at the stake" that's, what, reasonable?

      No neither are reasonable because they are the exact same argument. All I did was ape your own argument substituting different perps and different victims and you suddenly saw the light about how ridiculous your argument was, you just didn't realize it was your argument.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    17. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      All I did was ape your own argument substituting different perps and different victims

      Um, changing the subject and the object of a sentence changes its meaning.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    18. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Um, changing the subject and the object of a sentence changes its meaning.

      Lol, is that the best you can do? Cognitive dissonance must really have y'all shook up. The groups of people changed, but the severity of their 'crimes' did not, thus the meaning stayed the same.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    19. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by avronius · · Score: 1

      I think that I understand what you were getting at, but I don't believe that immigrants are any worse [or any better] than anyone else. We have immigrants up here in Canada, too. A small percentage feel the need to gather in groups of isolated ethnicity for the purpose of defence or agression. Gang activity existed long before their arrival, but these groups become a convenient scapegoat for *all* gang activity.

      These problems will exist regardless of whether or not you allow new people to populate your land. Your initial post suggests a rather xenophobic view point. The fact that you continue to argue an "us against them" rather than trying to find a way to live together... Well, it continues to support that assumption.

    20. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by the_womble · · Score: 1
      On average, illegal immigrants kill 25 American citizens every day.

      Thats 12 murders and 13 road accidents, even if we believe the numbers that produced out of thin air with no citations. I see no reason to believe it because a politician says so - in case you did not know, it is not unknown for politicians to distort numbers, and these could be distorted in a number of ways.

      Given how good Americans are at killing each other both by murder and in road accidents., the illegal immigrants contribution is not huge.

      US death rates for both causes are very high by developed country standards. The numbers for Britain are approx 300 murders and 3000 accident victims, which even on a per-capita basis are much lower. The problem that needs to be solved lies elsewhere.

    21. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Given how good Americans are at killing each other both by murder [usdoj.gov] and in road accidents. [driveandstayalive.com], the illegal immigrants contribution is not huge.

      It may not be huge statistically but if it's > 0, it's unnecessary, and tragic for the families of those affected.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:Illegals Kill 25 Americans Every Day by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Your initial post suggests a rather xenophobic view point

      You're making the classic mistake of confusing opposition to illegal entry with an opposition to immigration. I'm a huge proponent of immigration, and as we typically get the cream of the crop coming here legally, it improves our society greatly. You can check my comment exchange with an H1B worker from a few days ago if you're uncertain (on the H1B story). Heck, four of my great grandparents were immigrants. On the other side you have to go back a few more great's but no human evolved in North America, so all of my ancestors are immigrants.

      What's strange is that folks here expect me to support my rule-of-law approach to illegal entry. Our stable society is based on this very concept, so I reject the notion entirely, and ask folks to try to convince me that we should allow illegal entry. Cheap lawn mowing and 5-cent-cheaper lettuce hasn't convinced me so far. My local economy is almost entirely devoid of illegal workers so it doesn't have a great impact on my life, but it does on others.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  18. Re:GO Home, or become a citizen. by shylock0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Setting aside the obvious flamebait nature of the parent, I'll take a moment to respond to this.

    It is extremely difficult to become a US Citizen. Trying to attain citizenship while on an H1-B visa is a long and slow process, often up to 7 or 8 years. We should be letting people pursue citizenship more quickly, but we don't, at least if they are on H1-B status.

    --
    Statistically speaking, there's a 99.998% chance that my IQ is higher than yours. Get over it.
  19. Re:GO Home, or become a citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is extremely difficult to become a US Citizen. Trying to attain citizenship while on an H1-B visa is a long and slow process, often up to 7 or 8 years. We should be letting people pursue citizenship more quickly, but we don't, at least if they are on H1-B status.

    It is relatively easy to become a U.S. citizen. It's getting the green card first that's hard. Unless you have a U.S. parent, or were born here, all paths to naturalization run though the green card, as that's how you satisfy the 5 year minimum residency requirement (3 for those on marriage GC's). Time spent in the USA on non-immigrant visas like H1-B's is not counted toward that total.

  20. Separate Visa program for business owners... by bwcbwc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As above: talk to a lawyer. I'm pretty sure there's a separate visa program for business owners, as opposed to employees. On the other hand, you probably have to give up the H1B to get it.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  21. You can create a corporation. by pakora · · Score: 1

    Not really. US is a great country when it comes to business. I have been at a similar crossroads and this is what I found. Anyone can create a business in the US irrespective of their visa status. The catch is, you can not sponsor your own H1 and you can not earn second income from services while you are on H1 (including AdSense money). Here is what can be done, you can continue to get the money in your company and don't draw it ... let it sit in the company or further invest through your company. Remember, if you have a company it has to pay taxes (expect at least $800/yr, if you are making more than this on AdSense alone, I need to know what site you have :)). One of the best places to incorporate business for people on H1 I felt is Nevada State. You can keep the owner anonymous you are protected by state laws. Second, they have bearer share/stocks meaning whoever holds the share certificate is the owner you do not require papers to show transfers etc..... You don't even need to be present in NV. This maybe of some help: http://www.companiesinc.com/ for starters. As a caution, take my information with a grain of salt and do consult a professional. HTH. PS: No offence, but IMHO US is a great country with a mediocre and somewhat parasitic immigration policy.

  22. Re:Sheez, you forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ``Sheez, you forgot the "federal pound-in-the-ass prison"''

    Wasn't that already covered by all the people with posts starting out with "I ANAL"?

    -- AC

  23. Wuh oh by BluedemonX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did you have authorization from the INS to be running an enterprise for pay, e.g. this little side project of yours? Doesn't matter you were paid via AdSense, you took on side work, even entrepreneurial, you were not authorized to perform.

    Technically you're subject to immediate deportation for breaking the law.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    1. Re:Wuh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's illegal here is that he got paid.

      It is generally O.K. to volunteer as long as no renumeration is involved: salary, insurance, room&board, entertainment, free admission, etc. (occasional meals, office parties, and such are not considered pay and are not illegal). To repeat: getting paid in any way is a big no-no, but working for free is fine!

      It's a gray area if you are "volunteering" to do the job others are paid to do (for example while waiting for your permission to get processed), but if the shit ever hits the fan, your employer will be in trouble and not you.

      To remedy the submitter's situation, she should close the AdSense account and forfeit any funds therein. (no, not donate to charity or whatever, but outright deny the ownership).

      Remember you aliens: working for pay without the explicit authorization is about the worst thing you can do in the eyes on the USCIS.

    2. Re:Wuh oh by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      RE: What's illegal here is that he got paid.

      They also have a rule that if a job is technically one you COULD get paid for, you're breaking the law.

      I know this because my spouse, waiting for years without being able to work while my GC was being processed, tried to find some way to not have a multiple year hole in her resume. We were told unequivocally even if she never collected a dime, if she "volunteered" at a non-volunteer position e.g. working a job even for no pay, we'd be outta there.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    3. Re:Wuh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some employers are trying to be extra-careful here, that's all. Working for free is a Labor issue, not an immigration issue, and therefore the employer would get in trouble, not your wife.

      They told her she would get in trouble either because they don't know the law, or they wanted to make it look they care about her and not about their own ass (and who can blame them?).

  24. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need to report the income from outside the US for the first two years

    Income from outside the U.S. is neither taxable nor reportable as long as you can file the form 8843 AND 1040NR or 1040NR-EZ (usually at least for the first 2 years you are here, but can be as long as 6, talk to a lawer).

  25. E1 Visa for setting up a business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use an E1 visa to setup a business. Leads to green card as well. Need to have 250k+ though.

  26. Pretty easy. by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    I think what you want is a Delaware LLC. Foreign ownership doesn't matter as long as you have a "registered agent" in Delaware. I am not a lawyer, so this is the equivalent of legal advice you found on the underside of a Snapple bottle. But start your search there.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  27. so isn't H-1B an "outdated business model" by grepya · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody yet commented on how this case shows how broken the H-1b "Business Model" is. Isn't that the common slashdotian rap on all the other big organizations (e.g. *AA) who try to place artificial barriers on activities that seem so "natural" (e.g. sharing a song with your friend, time-shifting, place shifting, making money on google ads from traffic on your blog etc.) just to protect an technologically obsolete'd business model (making loads of money off of marketing and distributing content in un-necessary physical forms, "protecting" American jobs by artificially restricting economic activity by un-necessary and totally irrelevant geographical boundaries). The biggest irony here is that the OP could be carrying out *exactly* the identical economic activity sitting anywhere else in the world and it's perfectly legal... heck even makes an American company some money (what google is paying this guy is after all just a cut from what google *itself* is making from the advertisers, right?).

      So where's the outcry for removing the bureaucratic restrictions that limit highly educated law abiding immigrant's earning potentials on all the different narrowly defined immigration categories (student visas, H-1B, research visas etc.). If we're accepting them in our fold, briging them in because we think it's in our benefit (debate it all you will... but that's what the legislation, the legal voice of this country, officially says), why treat them as sub-human by restricting them from engaging in activities that are otherwise considered perfectly legal and even desirable (creating a business, engaging in gainful employment, creating something of economic value in their free time) in our own citizens ?

  28. Re:so isn't H-1B an "outdated business model" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 Year! I have been in this country for 8 years as a student and now on H1b visa. Everytime I think of a business, H1b stops me!

    Getting a greencard is a nightmare and the current wait -- 5 years.

    Its easier to start a business once you get a Greencard (if you can get one before your idea dies) else you'll end up spending more money on the lawyers.

    Lawyers by the way love this!!! More delays more $$$