Slashdot Mirror


Sun Offering Optimized AMP Stack On Solaris

tbray writes "This is your friendly local Sun corporate drone reporting that we're going to be building and optimizing and DTrace-ing and shipping and supporting the AMP part of LAMP (details here). I think that basically the whole tech industry, excepting Microsoft, is now at least partly in the AMP camp."

10 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Well, I'm AMP'd by denmarkw00t · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will Sun also be rolling out energy drinks for server admins?

    1. Re:Well, I'm AMP'd by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Funny

      An optimised SPAM stack! Just what we need!

  2. i love carpet... i love desk.. by President_Camacho · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're going to be building and optimizing and DTrace-ing and shipping and supporting the AMP part of LAMP (details here).

    I love lamp.

  3. Yeah but... by dasOp · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about an optimizied, Dtraced and -l"-froot" free telnetd?

  4. Meanwhile... by linguae · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Microsoft is announcing an optimized ISA (IIS Server, SQL Server, ASP.NET) Linked List on Windows Vista(TM). More details to follow.

  5. You call that an AMP stack? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    THIS is an amp stack. /dundee

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:You call that an AMP stack? by hotdip · · Score: 2, Funny

      dude, that looks like a half-stack to me.

  6. Re:SAMP VS LAMP by joe_bruin · · Score: 4, Funny
    No doubt, SAMP > LAMP.

    strcmp confirms it, SAMP is greater than LAMP!

    $ cat amp.c
    main() { printf("%d\n", strcmp("SAMP", "LAMP")); }
    $ gcc amp.c
    $ ./a.out
    1
  7. Re:The "AMP Camp"??? by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Funny

    LAMP still easily give you the best price/performance.

    Illegal division by zero

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  8. Re:Postgres Migration by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

    When the database connections are abstracted properly it becomes fairly trivial to swap out DB backends without changing much, if anything of the application itself.

    Nice in theory, but MySQL, being an "extended subset" of SQL, doesn't support a lot of standard SQL features, then makes up for it by doing it their own nonstandard way. Perl is nice about abstraction with the DBI, but PHP is a complete mess. Every PHP project I've seen either a) uses raw mysql_* functions or b) uses a roll-your-own db "abstraction" which is tied to mysql tighter than the ball gag in CmdrTaco's mouth when Cowboy Neal re-enacts the gimp scene from Pulp Fiction.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.