Slashdot Mirror


No Closed Video Drivers For Next Ubuntu Release

lisah writes "Ubuntu's next release, Feisty Fawn, is due out in April and, according to company CTO Matt Zimmerman, proprietary video drivers failed to make the cut for the default install. Zimmerman told Linux.com that although the software required for Composite support is not ready for prime-time and therefore will not be included in Feisty, Ubuntu hasn't given up entirely on including video drivers in future releases. '[T]he winds aren't right yet. We will continue to track development and will revisit the decision if things change significantly.' Ambiguous or not, the decision to exclude proprietary drivers for now should satisfy at least some members of the Ubuntu Community. In other Feisty Fawn news, the Board also decided to downgrade support for Power PC due to a lack of funding." Linux.com and Slashdot are both part of OSTG.

6 of 448 comments (clear)

  1. more than just desktops, by Aeron65432 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Or maybe we complain just because we like our Tuxracer, UT, Doom3, and desktops to be ready to go when started.

    Or, it could be because installing ATI drivers (for those of you out there who've done it know this) is an absolute pain in the ass on Ubuntu. When I installed NVidia drivers on my friends laptop, I groaned because it was so convenient.

    People would complain if OpenOffice, Firefox, and some kind of movie/music didn't come packaged with Feisty Fawn, and for good reason! They are essentials to the system! I think it's really too bad they probably won't be included.

    1. Re:more than just desktops, by 605dave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "What's so difficult about: % sh ./ati-driver-installer-8.33.6-x86.x86_64.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/6.10 % dpkg -i *deb" Wow, and you people wonder why Linux hasn't taken hold for the average consumer. Sure it isn't difficult to type that line, but it looks confusing and intimidating to the average person. And that answer is always slightly condescending too, implying someone is an idiot for not knowing the obvious solution. Linux will not succeed anytime soon on the desktop market, because the geeks who make it don't respect the non-geeks who would use it.

      --
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
    2. Re:more than just desktops, by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Honestly, what do people expect? It's a fucking *nix.
      How was that again... "Mac OS X. Because making UNIX user-friendly was easier than fixing Windows."
    3. Re:more than just desktops, by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Typing in the stuff isn't difficult.

      Figuring out what to type in is. Rebooting, then coming up with a text screen because "startx" failed and there's nothing but an instruction telling you to restore your backed-up config (with, of course, no instructions on HOW to do that or, even better, an option to automatically do it)... that's very difficult.

      Of course typing in those commands *is* difficult for somebody who's visually (or otherwise) impaired. You can install a driver on Windows or OS X using a screen-reader... try typing in 6-x86.x86_64.run with a screen-reader.

    4. Re:more than just desktops, by rantingkitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Guys, I hate to break this to you, but "most users" can't install the drivers on Windows either. You ever walk someone through that process?

      "Okay, so go to nvidia.com and find the driver for your card."
      "How do I do that?"
      "Click Downloads, select your operating system..."
      "Is that Windows?"
      "Yes. So select that and--"
      "It says.. Windows XP slash 2000... Windows 98 slash 95..."
      "You're on Windows XP. So select that."
      "Okay."
      "Now which video card do you have?"
      "I don't know."
      "Right click on the desktop. Go to properties. Go to Advanced. Do you see it?"
      "No."
      "Right above the colorful thing."
      "Oh. Okay.. uh.."
      "..it'll say Nvidia something, or maybe GeForce something."
      "Ohhhh. GeForce 5200?"
      "Okay, select that then."
      "Where?"
      "On the WEBSITE."
      "Exit out of this?"
      "YES, EXIT OUT OF THE PROPERTIES THING AND GO BACK TO THE WEBSITE."
      "Okay."
      "..."
      "..."
      "..."
      "Did you select the 5200 yet?"
      "No, am I supposed to?"
      "YES. Click that. Click next."
      "Do-I-want-to-download-the-following-file: installer dot exe."
      "Yes. Download that."
      "Where should I save it?"
      "ANYWHERE. The desktop, okay?"
      "Okay... it's downloading."
      "..."
      "Do-I-want-to-run-the-following-application: installer dot exe."
      "Yesssss."
      "It says.. warning-some-software-can-damage-your-computer-are -you-sure-you--"
      "Yes."
      "Accept terms and conditions?"
      "...yes..."
      "This-will-install-nvidia-drivers-blah-blah-blah, continue?"
      "...yes..."
      "Setup is preparing the... uh, install..shield.. wizard?"
      "That's fine, just let it go."
      "Do I click Next?"
      "YES. YES. JUST KEEP HAMMERING NEXT UNTIL IT SAYS FINISHED."
      "Okay. ...it says finished, do I click Ok?"
      "YES FOR GOD'S SAKE ALREADY!"
      "Okay, now it says I must reboot. Should I do that?"
      "@#%"

      Yeah. That's much, much easier for most people. The CLI looks intimidating but, to most people, both Windows and Linux CLI are incomprehensible gibberish anyway, so what's the difference?

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  2. Re:This is the Aqua and Aero "equivalent" ? by arevos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apparently what is probably the premier desktop-oriented Linux distro doesn't think it's stable enough to include, but it's just as good - nay, better - than Aqua and Aero ? From a stability perspective, Beryl and Compiz have quite a way to go. However, the base systems seem more flexible than their proprietary counterparts from what I've seen. Do you know if Aqua or Aero have a plugin system that enables one to add third party effects to the graphics system? For instance, could I write a plugin for either desktop that would make my windows "wobble" when moving them around? Or explode in a shower of sparks when closed? Or would adding such features be built into the operating system and unable to be altered or extended by third party developers?

    I don't think it's accurate to say that 3D acceleration on Linux is necessarily better than Aqua and Aero, as it's currently more immature. However, the X based systems seem to me to be more flexible, with a more clearly defined architecture. When this reaches stability, it seems that Linux will enjoy a not insignificant advantage over its competitors. Until then, I'd have to consider it as not better, but perhaps "more promising".