Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Hands Over User Info To Fox

An anonymous reader writes "Tech Crunch has an article about YouTube identifying and handing over a user's information after a request from Fox. 'Three weeks after receiving a subpoena from the U.S. District Court in Northern California, YouTube has reportedly identified a user accused by 20th Century Fox Television of uploading episodes of the show 24 a week prior to their running on television. That user, named ECOTtotal, is also alleged to have uploaded 12 episodes of The Simpsons, some quite old. Apparently Google and YouTube were willing and able to identify the owner of the username ECOTtotal, according to a report on InternetNews.com.'"

3 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Willing and able by paranode · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not only would they, they pretty much have to if they don't want law enforcement just coming in and confiscating all of their hardware.

  2. Re:It was only a matter of time by roger6106 · · Score: 5, Informative

    A previous post

    The full DVD of the first four episodes was ALL OVER Usenet on the 7th.

    Thousands of people DLed that, and one guy encoded it for submission to YouTube.

    No insider job here.

  3. Re:This really is theft by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, in this case you are wrong. Until the information has been made public, it could be claimed (and a jury would likely agree) that the material is a Fox trade secret. It contains plot twists and other elements that are confidential until their air date, so that their impact has not been diluted by pre-emptive copies. Imagine if a writer for a soap opera saw a plot twist on a pre-release version of 24, then wrote that same twist into his or her soap to air before the 24 air date.

    Federal law does prohibit stealing of trade secrets, and it is classified as "theft". See for example the recent conviction of a Coca-Cola ex-secretary, who attempted to sell formula information to Pepsi-Cola. Copying the data and providing it to Pepsi did not cause Coke to lose possession of their formula, but it did potentially deprive them of a trade secret.

    Before you respond, please read through and understand Title 18, United States Code, Section 1832(a)(1-3).

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.