Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

OSS Music Composer Gaining Attention

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the sounds-like-fun dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Following in the footsteps of Psycle, VioLet Composer is a completely GPLed music composer for Windows that has slowly but surely been gaining attention. In an interview at Laptoprockers the author covers not only the program itself but the his reasoning behind choosing to open the source using the GPL."

6 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. Re:And now with link by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey, know anyone good with Mono and Linux audio? You could have him/her work with them, then you wouldn't need wine.

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  2. For Buzz-lovers (not alcoholics, but musicians)... by Agram · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...there is also a cross-platform Buzz-port titled Aldrin which is actually comparable if not more mature than this software. It has already a majority of Buzz objects ported over and has gained some momentum among the Buzz community. And yes, it does run on Linux...

  3. Re:Don't forget ModPlug by shawb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think you're looking for ProTools. It does pretty much what you say. It is, however, quite expensive and needs specialized hardware to be used to the full extent. Hence the Pro part of the name. I don't know if it natively works on a note by note basis, I think conceptually it's more of a software based multi-track recorder. It does, however, have plug-ins that allow for such thing as locking pitch/etc. You know, all the effects used on pop-divas to make them actually sound bearable.

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  4. Mono by Chemicalscum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone got his running on Linux using Mono yet?

  5. Re:That's not music composition by David+Greene · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thank you! I switched to Lilypond several months ago and never looked back. It is so much more flexible than Finale and its ilk due to the fact that it isn't constrained by a graphical representation. I also find that writing music in text is a lot faster than point-and-click or even recording and going back to adjust all of the quantizing problems.

    I love the ability to use music variables to hold repeating sequences. I love the programmability (even better with the new streams model). It's extremely easy to write parts for each instrument and mix-and-match them into different scores. I find that, for example, some people in choirs like to see the full SATB parts in a traditional two-staff layout, others prefer a four-staff layout while some prefer just to see their own part. The pianist really wants to see the SATB put on a standard two-staff piano score. No problem with lilypond, I can tailor the presentation to each individual choir member if I wish.

    And it makes beautiful engravings, too!

    In my opinion, Lilypond completely outclasses commercial and proprietary music scoring software.

    --

  6. Re:And now with link by aybiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi, I'm the developer. Can I ask what hardware you're running? VC runs pretty nice on my 3800+ X2, but I'm not sure what sort of hardware it *won't* work on. Well, I do know it doesn't work on a Celery 650 with 64 megs of RAM running ME, but that isn't really surprising. :-D

    --
    It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.