Reverse Hacker Awarded $4.3 Million
jcatcw writes "Shawn Carpenter was awarded a $4.3 million award — more than twice the amount he sought and money he thinks he'll never see. Carpenter worked for Sandia National Labs as an intrusion detection analyst. He anayzed. He detected. He reported. He was fired — in Janurary 2005 after sharing his results with the FBI and the U.S. Army. Computerworld asked him what he hoped to achieve in that investigation. Answer: 'In late May of 2004, one of my investigations turned up a large cache of stolen sensitive documents hidden on a server in South Korea. In addition to U.S. military information, there were hundreds of pages of detailed schematics and project information marked 'Lockheed Martin Proprietary Information — Export Controlled' that were associated with the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. ... It was a case of putting the interests of the corporation over those of the country.' Ira Winkler, author of Spies Among Us , said the verdict was 'incredibly justified. Frankly, I think people [at Sandia] should go to jail' for ignoring some of the security issues that Carpenter was trying to highlight with his investigation."
What he did was arguably in a gray area...on his own time, he used "hacker techniques" (not my preferred wording, sorry. Read the article.) to track down stolen data on foreign sites. That he turned his results over to the FBI is good, even if it screwed over Sandia.
Of course, the judgement against Sandia will get passed on to the US Government in a "cost plus" contract...
tasks(723) drafts(105) languages(484) examples(29106)
....the fact that a corporation was holding its own interests over that of its founding nation?
I mean, hey, great - I'm really glad this guy got the compensation very much due him. What worries me more is that the article didn't read "Corporation ignores serious national security concerns because there was no obvious profit."
I always wonder... do businesses really think they're immune to the affairs of their "mother country?" I'm quite sure any corporation that sees most of its factories razed would find their bottom line hit pretty hard.
Granted, I'm a teacher by trade, and I don't have that same mindset... but even as a human being, I'm going to tend to the security of the nation that keeps carbombs off my streets before I tend to the profits of fat-cat, tax-dodging boss.
Patriotism isn't an archaic concept; it's a survivalist one.
The ability to communicate well does not directly correspond to the ability to communicate intelligently.
Does he un-hack things? Every search result for this term only points to the same story appearing on every meme site.
Because if he's an offensive hacker -- e.g. one of "ours" to attack the enemy -- that doesn't make it "reverse" hacking.
Their contracts with the government allow them to pass court awarded punitive damages to the government? On TV doctor dramas, punitive damages are awarded if there is evidence of gross negligence. For what possible reason would the government enter such an agreement?
let me give you my gut level response about what you've missed in a corporate level mindset. (bugs, bugs, they're crawling all over me now)
any end scenario that equates with annihalation/extinction of the company is not worth considering or planning for.
on a scale of 1-10, (1 being some hourly wage earner is caught taking 40$ from the till) a 5-8 embarrasement bad pr episode (security leak, court judgement, contracts broken) is a whole lot worse for the company than a 10 extinction, because at 100% corporation extinction/cessation of manufacturing, there is no one left to point fingers (other than history) in the internal squabbles.... a mid level manager would rather the company declare banktrupcy than one of his subs become a series of internal memos cc'd to legal...
every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
It sounds like a delightful place to work, where other employees are afraid to talk to this guy now because they think their phones are wiretapped, and they would rather hide their problems than fix them. Just as well they never wanted to interview me.
You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?co
I remember there was quite a large article in Time magazine about Carpenter, two years ago. http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1098961,0 0.html
Burn Karma, Burn
However, if my job was to get disinformation out to people, I would call it secret, pay millions for security, but let it get stolen anyway.
Ya just gotta be paranoid to survive in this world.