Vista Worse For User Efficiency Than XP

erikvlie writes "Pfeiffer Consulting released a report on User Interface Friction, comparing Windows Vista/Aero with Windows XP and Mac OS X. The report concludes that Vista/Aero is worse in terms of desktop operations, menu latency, and mouse precision than XP — which was and still is said to be a lot worse on those measures than Mac OS X. The report was independently financed. The IT-Enquirer editor has read the report and summarized the most important findings."

Comments

Re:On What Hardware?

[sogoodsofarsowhat]

Drinkypoo...let me start with your an idiot. I have both Windows and Macs running and my Macs out run my PC's running windows in Parallels. Your whole statement is utter BS. MY Macs are way more stable then my PC's. I rarely if ever restart my Macs. You state that you cant get anything done on your Mac but frustration and to that i say BS. I get loads done on my Macs without anything so much as a bother...my PC's continue to be a source of problems and crashes. You obviously dont know what the FARK your doing with a computer...so just go back to your sales job at BB. I own/operate manufacturing plants in the USA and Thailand and we run both MACs and PCs. PCs because somethings are only available on them...for everything else we run MACs. (PCs above refers to computers running Windows...as we have a few Linux servers and they are no trouble either).