Sweden Admits Tapping Citizens' Phones for Decades
paulraps writes "Sweden is close to implementing new surveillance legislation that will include the monitoring of emails, telephone calls and keyword searches using advanced pattern analysis. The objective is to detect 'threats such as terrorism, IT attacks or the spread of weapons of mass destruction' but the proposals have divided the country. In a misguided attempt to put people at ease, the government admitted that Sweden has been tapping its citizens' phones for decades anyway."
Guy : Honey, I think we should start seeing other people .. SMACK
Gal : I can't believe you are saying that, I thought our relationship was strong
Guy : I don't know why you're so upset, I've been seeing others for 10 years now, hasn't bothered you yet
Gal : You've been doing WHAT?!>
Guy : Oh, uh, I mean, well, did I say 10years, I meant
Why encrypt it? Everyone is speaking Swedish -- who can understand THAT anyway?
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Yeah, well it's not like Sweden has a document like the US Constitution that prot....ect......s.... its um, citizens from....... Er..... Nevermind.
Revolution!
Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
Wi nøt trei a høliday in Sweden this yër?
See the løveli lakes
The wøndërful telephøne system
And mäni interesting furry animals
the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
Everyone is speaking Swedish -- who can understand THAT anyway?
Chefs?
Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
We apologize for the fault in the comments. Those responsible have been sacked.
Anonymous Møøse
That's why they spy on them.
Everyone knows what they've been saying on the phone: endless variants on "B0rk b0rk b0rk!"
With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
Sweden and Norway are neighbors? I thought they were the same state.
My apologies. I graduated from the American Public Education System.
In my country we have a constitution that protects our rights from invasion by the government. I could say wahtever I wanted to about President Bush and suffer no consequences at all.
I for one would never say anything bad about President Bush though, even though I know the FBI/CIA/Whaterver aren't listening to me. That would just be silly.
Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
poolreps vreetes "Svedee is cluse-a tu implementing noo soorfeeellunce-a legeesleshun thet veell incloode-a zee muneeturing ooff imeeels, telephune-a cells und keyvurd seerches useeng edfunced pettern unelysees. Zee oobjectife-a is tu detect 'threets sooch es terrureesm, IT ettecks oor zee spreed ooff veepuns ooff mess destroocshun' boot zee prupusels hefe-a deefided zee cuoontry. In a meesgooided ettempt tu poot peuple-a et iese-a, zee gufernment edmeetted thet Svedee hes beee teppeeng its ceetizens' phunes fur decedes unyvey."
c/tabs/your hands/
It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
granted this makes a good point about how pervasive misandry is in that the original poster automatically placed the male as the cheater
Are you saying that I hate myself? I guess I could have said "person1" and "person2", since had I switched the genders around then I could also be accused of being a misogynist (or maybe more correctly that my statement was misogynistic).
but you could have used a slightly more diplomatic way to draw attention to it
How about:
Gal : Honey, I think we should start seeing other people.
Guy : That's funny I was thinking the same thing.
Gal : Oh, you were?
Guy : Yeah, as a matter of fact I've been thinking about it for years now
Gal : You have?
Guy : Yup, I figured our relationship was strong enough to take it to the next level
Gal : Yeah, I guess
Guy : Glad you feel that way, by the way, what would you say to a threesoSMACK
Guy : Thought so