Slashdot Mirror
Can Outing an Anonymous Blogger be Justified?
netbuzz writes "Absolutely, depending on the circumstances, yet a Florida newspaper's attempt to unmask 'a political group hiding behind the name of a fictitious person' has sparked outrage in some circles. Part of the reason for that outrage is that the paper posted to its Web site a surveillance video of the blogger visiting its advertising department, a tactic the editor says he now regrets. What's really at issue here is the right to publish anonymously vs. the right to remain anonymous. The former exists, the latter does not."
When I think of "anonymous bloggers", I get this image.
Or, I recall that "Multiple Theology Degree, exquisite super-intelligentsia" Essjay. Oh, thats right.. He's a redneck hick who lives about 80 Mi south of me (Louisville, KY).
Anybody can say whatever they want, but due to the "Credibility" of the internet, it usually means something is going to be believed. Not good, as most people haven't the logic or intelligence to discern real from fiction.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
So it can "absolutely" be justified, yet it is also "depending on the circumstances".
Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot.
Why is it obvious/implicit that you don't have the right to remain anonymous, save in a society where you have no rights?
I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
Try Batman Begins or Passion of the Christ. (Posting as an anonymous for obvious reasons.)