Slashdot Mirror


The Best Mac OS X Software Tools

An anonymous reader writes "Mac advocate John C. Welch weighs in with his list of the top 20 Mac OS X products (except Welch manages to list 22). The collection of software tools ranges from the obvious, such as Boot Camp, to the obscure but perhaps more useful — little-known apps like Peter Borg's Lingon, for creating launchd configuration files. What's on your personal list of indispensable Mac productivity aids and programming tools? Also, do you think Welch gives too much air time to built-in OS X tools at the expense of third-party products such as NetworkLocation?"

6 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Re:My favorite Mac Tools? by jb.hl.com · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ...erm.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  2. Re:Quicksilver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The article I was reading before this one, was talking about the "Double checked locking" paradigm and its non-portability (at best) and wrong behavior.

    I've a CS degree, I am surely a geek, I am programming since I was 9 (1985) and professionally since 2001.

    Yet there was no way I could've figured it out the failures in double checked locking patterns. Good luck explaining it to a non geek using drag and drop.

  3. The Borg. by Ash-Fox · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ... little-known apps like Peter Borg's Lingon ...
    You are worthy of assimilation. Lower your firewalls and surrender your beige boxes, we will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is futile.
    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  4. Re:The bit i like by MrTranscendence · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Having been incredibly productive with dynamically-typed languages, it would be difficult for me to put into words how wrong-headed and foolish your opinions are.

    So, instead, I'll point out that you misunderstood: they mean "typing" as in "writing text on a keyboard with fingers".

  5. Re:The bit i like by Stamen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I should start using this in interviews to weed out people like you. You are talking about dynamic typing, not weak typing.

    There is static/dynamic as well as weak/strong typing.

    C and C++ are weak typed, you know those languages that a lot of OSs are written in. However they are static typed. Something like Ruby is strong and dynamically typed.

    And dynamically typed languages are hardly dangerous; even the often mentioned "if you make a typo it doesn't catch it" reasoning isn't even correct most the time. Pleased to be explaining it to you:

    In Ruby, for example, a variable is created when it's first assigned (and you don't specify its type), like this:

    foo = "Hello"

    if later you use foo, but miss-type it, it generates an error:

    length = fooo.length

    in this case, it will complain ("undefined local variable or method `fooo' for main:Object") and catch your typo.

    In addition Ruby, as an example, is strongly typed you can't just add a string to an integer:

    i = 0
    foo = "1"
    i = i + foo

    In this case i is an integer and foo is a string, you can't treat foo like an integer without an error, because although it is dynamically typed it is strongly typed.

  6. Re:The bit i like by kisielk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Typing in the program and worrying about syntax and language details is probably the easiest part of programming. Developing a good design and actually engineering an application is the hard part. If you can do that, you can surely program it in to a computer.