Slashdot Mirror


20 Must-have Firefox Extensions

An anonymous reader noted that Computerworld is running a story on the 20 must have Firefox extensions. Several of my favorites are in there so I'm looking forward to playing with the ones I haven't heard of.

6 of 341 comments (clear)

  1. 20 is too many by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Based on my experience, Firefox often becomes unstable when too many extensions are included. The problem is that extensions can conflict with each other. This risk is low with a small number of extensions but increases as the number of extensions increases. Extensions are a great feature of Firefox, but it is best to select the 10 or so that really increase your productivity and let the rest go.

  2. Re:Adblock? by Tx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It may be selfish, but I kind of wish people wouldn't mention those too often. If they get too widely used, it will just mean more annoying, unavoidable ads. Like those ones that make you visit an ad page in order to then get the link to the actual article. Those piss me off.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  3. Might have been just me . . . by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    . . but I just dont see why many of those are 'Must have'. I mean how often do I need to measure stuff?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  4. Re:sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of that looks like it is not for making regular internet viewing easier, but for streamlining the viewing of internet porn (not saying net porn viewing isn't normal, but there is a distinction between using the net and using the net for porn). Kinda freaky what you can tell about someone from what extensions they have installed...

  5. Re:Adblock? by Inda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, true, because banner ads in the middle of TV programmes are so much better.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  6. Re:Adblock? by GetSource · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a way, I agree -- but more about people blocking *all* ads in general.

    However, while I don't mind people mentioning Adblock, I do mind people mentioning Filterset.g. For me, though, it's because ads are what make the internet run: if it weren't for ads, we wouldn't have near the amount of free sites that we do. Heck, Google would probably not even exist anymore.

    The reason that I *do* like Adblock is that it allows you to get rid of the ads that should have never existed in the first place: Shaking/blinking ads, video ads that eat up all your bandwidth, and ads with blaring auto-starting sound.

    What I generally do ... is leave most ads on, then block the ones that are especially irritating. This allows places to continue to have revenue, but only stunts the growth of the companies that produce ads that are more obtrusive/use more resources than an ad should.

    It's a little hypocritical, perhaps, but I think that when choosing an ad provider, a site should think about the users' comfort at their site as well as about ad revenue.