Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

SCO Says IBM Hurt Profits

Posted by kdawson on from the and-a-bandaid-for-your-knee dept.

AlanS2002 sends in a link from a local Utah newspaper covering the SCO-IBM trial. The Deseret News chose to emphasize SCO's claim that IBM hurt SCO's relationship with several high-tech powerhouses, causing SCO's market share and revenues to plummet. "[A]n attorney for Lindon-based SCO said IBM 'pressured' companies to cut off their relationships with SCO. And 'the effect on SCO was devastating and it was immediate'..." As usual Groklaw has chapter and verse on all the arguments in the motions for summary judgement.

3 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Hurt Profits? by Sillygates · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't that what competition is about? Taking business from competitors?

    --
    I fear the Y2038 bug
  2. Good by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably SCO should have thought about this before suing IBM for billions of dollars (with fake claims.)

    --
    You can't handle the truth.
  3. Infinite variations on a theme? by el+cisne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The theme "not our fault". When will these jokers die? Wasn't it SCO suing it's own customers that might have had something to do with their profit loss? Or their millions spent on flimsy legal activities? Might it have been... oh what's the point, it is all too ridiculous anymore. There's just about nothing that can be said that hasn't not been said ad infinitum already. This stuff almost doesn't rate as 'news' anymore, just another spewing forth from the absurd. The news will be when this is over and their corpse rotting.