The Dozen Space Weapon Myths
Thanks to Disowned Sky for finding a good debunking piece on space based weapon systems. Slightly disheartening, because I really want to have solar energy satellites that are also lasers. The article does a good job of looking further afield at nations besides the United States efforts in this area.
As item 9 points out, the Soviets had continued nuclear space development in violation of a treaty that had been signed specifically to prevent them from doing that.
See, that's the beauty of nuclear weapons. Once you have them, other nations are really no longer in any position to lecture you about developing them -- unless of course they're willing to enter into nuclear war over it.
So much for that treaty. :-/
Yeah, all of 'em.
It seems from the story, and just pragmatism, the best option is to hope the folks who have the best weapons are the most friendly types. If the cold war is any lesson, the people with the most freedom create the best economic engine, and thus in turn the richest state, and then in turn again, the best weapons.
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
This article is highly amateurish and just about content-free. Shorter "Space Review":
The Space Review: No they don't! (no citation given)
TSR: No they don't! (no citation given)
TSR: No they aren't! (no citation given)
TSR: So what, the Russians have the same capability!
TSR: Let's confuse the issue by only talking about boost-phase BMD intercept!
TSR: No they haven't! (no citation given)
TSR: Yes it did! (no citation given)
I stopped reading at this point. This whole article is nothing more than a fact-free propaganda screed. I can't believe Slashdot even bothered to post it... on second thought, yes I can.
Sean