Slashdot Mirror


Sport Is Unrelated To Obesity In Children

xiox writes "The UK government is planning to stop funding a study to understand obesity in children. The study fits children with accelerometers to measure how much energy each child uses in a day by moving. The results are surprising. Those children who do sports at school do not burn more calories than those who don't. Furthermore there is no correlation between body mass index and the number of calories used! The results are very interesting, suggesting that genetics and diet are the main reasons for childhood obesity, not sport. The UK government is trying to increase the amount of sport in schools."

4 of 594 comments (clear)

  1. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While this may show interesting correlations, the fact remains that if more calories are burnt than are consumed, the body will lose weight.

    When kids exercise more, they also eat more, and the body tries to retain the same reserves while burning off more calories. Eating no more, or just a little more, will be fine and the subject will still lose weight.

    It's when the eating leads to significantly ore eating that there is a problem.

    So, exercise and diet are required. But that isn't news. We've known this for quite some time.

  2. Re:After TFA, read this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The childhood obesity epidemic is an epidemic of news stories, not a problem itself.

    Horseshit. When I was in school 20 or so years ago, you could count the number of fat kids (in a school of 2300 students) on your fingers, and a child who would be considered obese by today's standards was virtually unheard of. At my kids' schools, it's easier to count the kids who aren't fat than the ones who are, and there's at least one obese kid in any group larger than about ten.

    I know it's all the rage to pretend that whatever problems our society causes itself don't actually exist, but this one is pretty easy to nail down. Anybody who says we don't have a serious problem with kids and their poor eating habits and lack of activity is either an idiot or a liar.

  3. Re:Maybe sports in school takes fun out of exercis by GuyfromTrinidad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being someone who works with an organization that promotes mass participation physical activities for children I can say that you have touched on a key issue. Physical activity with the pairing of the benefits of a healthy diet should be promoted and not the concept of sport that pits child against child and team against team. Sport is good but encouraging everyone to engage in a general healthy lifestyle which should include moderate to vigorous physical activity is key. And on a final note before I took up my job at this organization I was a "physical education" teacher (we prefer that over gym teacher, we are teaching a subject not a room) and I wasn't a frustrated former athlete and though there is a percentage of former athletes who become PE teachers, its not as high as you think.

    --
    End of line
  4. Re:Everyone knows by SageMusings · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well children burn calories like mad even at rest. If for nothing else, they're always growing and that takes significant energy.

    While I have not read all the /. comments yet, I hope we do not damn the study simply because the results were not what we expected. That's the whole reason we're supposed to be doing studies in the first place. Rubber stamping desired outcomes is what corporate sponsored studies are for.

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement