Slashdot Mirror


Mars Rovers Moving After Winter Hibernation

jcasman writes to mention an article at Astronomy.com discussing the now on-the-move Mars rovers, which have been effectively in hibernation over the long Martian winter. Spirit has been stationary in the Columbia Hills area, just barely powered up and taking the finest panoramic shot of the planet to date. On the other side of the world, Opportunity has been skulking around the Victoria crater. Scientists have been getting to know the area before attempting to send Opportunity into the geographical feature itself. "Opportunity now is traversing Victoria's rim, and mission scientists are naming features they find after places visited by Ferdinand Magellan and his crew during the first circumnavigation of Earth. (Victoria Crater itself is named after the lone ship that completed Magellan's quest.) [Steve Squyres of Cornell University] and his team are committed to driving Opportunity into the crater eventually, if they're sure the rover will be safe -- in other words, that they can get it out again. Squyres is confident they can, and he thinks it will be sooner rather than later."

9 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. I need a cigarette by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny
    Thanks, Slashdot.

    Opportunity has been skulking around the Victoria crater.

    Opportunity now is traversing Victoria's rim, ... ... driving Opportunity into the crater ... ... they can get it out again You just made my Friday.
    1. Re:I need a cigarette by regularstranger · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know you're a nerd when you use an interplanetary probe to investigate your lady.

  2. Re:strangely erotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    >>anyone else find that strangely erotic?

    Sure. They guy that just posted 2 before you did.

  3. NASA reports... by dedazo · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that after the first attempt to move the rover without success, they pointed the camera down and realized that the little guy was propped up on four cinder blocks...

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  4. McMurdo Panorama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's that finest panoramic shot in Quicktime VR format: http://www.fotoausflug.de/en-mars.html

  5. Things have really changed in space exploration by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Man's first words on another world:

    That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.
    Machine's

    Hello world.
    --
    for sale
    I'm a self-modifying sig virus
  6. Re:WDFD! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll agree. Though as I understand it (and I may be wrong), at least part of the reason that the rovers were spec'ed for 90 days was that NASA believed that the solar panels would end up covered in dust and be unable to generate power. Conveniently enough, there appears to be a nice breeze which is blowing dust off the solar panels so that they can continue to work.

    I wonder what might happen when they drive the rover into the crater. If the end up driving it somewhere where this isn't much of a wind, will the solar panels get covered in dust and stop working?

    Also--raging personal opinion based on no facts whatsoever--I think NASA low-balled on purpose. It's easier to ask for money to "extend the mission" than it is to ask for the money in the first place. If NASA had asked for the money to run two rovers around Mars for three years, they'd've been shot down. But once you have the rover on the surface and it's running, it's easier to go and say, "Hey, we've already spent this money and the equipment is still working so can we have more money to keep it running?"

    It's a good way to deal with government bureaucracy...

  7. They must be running Windows XP: Space Edition by bluemonq · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can only get my XP Pro to wake up out of hibernate mode about 30% of the time...

  8. Re:WDFD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the wind issue is likely.

    Regarding the low-balling: The 90 day mission time and the driving distance goal were based on the performance of the previous Pathfinder mission. That one lasted about 3 times as long as it was supposed to before what was probably an electrical failure ended the mission. During that time, they also monitored the gradually decreasing power as the solar cells dirtied. Based on the data and improvements to the rovers, they made their estimates.

    90 days (and 600 meters driving, and I think X number of observations) was actually the requirement for them to be able to call the mission a success. The mission budget included a 90 day operating extension if everything looked good at that point. Furthermore, there was a 180 day extended mission (with slightly reduced staff) if they were still rolling well after 6 months. Effectively, they needed 90 days, they built them to last 180 days, and were hoping for 360.

    When 1 year passed, they actually had get a special budget allocation from Congress to keep running. 2 years later, most of the team has moved on to other projects and a lot of the tasks have been automated, but they're still running with a purpose.

    The rover team has repeatedly expressed pleasant flabbergastation at their performance. They're probably more surprised than the rest of the world. I know it's going to be tough for them when the rovers finally do kick the bucket, or harder yet, are abandoned to focus resources on newer projects like MSL.