Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Hackers Waking up to Malware

An anonymous reader writes "An increase in malware originating from China has not gone unnoticed by security researchers, according to the site ITWeek. The aggravating software has been increasing over the last three months, to the point where some unlucky persons may be getting some every day. Individuals interviewed for the article are seeing an increasing sophistication and independent use of rootkits, new to the Chinese malware scene. 'China has traditionally been a hotbed of password stealers who go after log-in names and passwords for online games such as World of Warcraft. The criminals are after virtual currencies and goods which can be sold on auction websites.' These new types of software are actually encrypted, and can prove hard to dismantle."

15 of 65 comments (clear)

  1. National Security Nightmare? by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the sony rootkit was a front to steal national secrets?

    --
    for sale
    I'm a self-modifying sig virus
  2. Re:Catching up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...because for the most part its all in chinese. think about it, we pretty much have "western" adware and spyware mapped out to the point where we know whos behind what and what the files are doing. security researchers can map out whole families of CWS, even if they don't specifically know whos behind it. throw some chinese adware on a pc however, and even something as basic as the sites popping up is a strange new experience. are the sites legit? hacked? the adware guys current flavour of the month? who knows? and thats before youve even got to the adware. i imagine the problems are multiplied when dealing with something more malicious.

  3. Re:Catching up? by tinkertim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Malware Rootkits AdWare is all pretty standard stuff.

    How exactly is this news?


    That which serves ads must be news.
  4. Pretty cool stuff, actually by shrapnull · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This article is interesting because a) I've seen it firsthand this past week, and b) Some of these are actually very sophisticated attacks.

    One of our buildings was going through an antivirus upgrade over AD when it got hit. Every machine in the building was getting an iframe in the web browser from some Chinese ISP (usa.d3a.us) that would bracket the computers web browsing session throughout its duration. The iframe contained javascript designed to capture passwords from gmail and other public websites, in essence a browser-based keylogger. Of course, blocking the offending domains through our filter got rid of the iframe, but it still affected websites because now they all had broken source code (wonderful XML render errors on just about every website, including google).

    Then the hunt was on.

    The 'sophistication' I witnessed comes from the fact that no matter how many of these boxes we cleaned and patched, the iframe source code kept popping up everywhere. I ran a Wireshark on it and discovered something rather interesting (to me anyways). The software was attacking the router's ARP table, by feeding it a bogus mac address (one of the infected machines) in essence redirecting all network traffic to a software-based proxy. Tracking down machines via MAC address and patching them eventually resolved the issue long enough to update the antivirus on the network, but I left the place somewhat in awe of what I had just seen, having most of my network antivirus experience involve easily blockable/patchable worms and viruses.

    While an ARP attack isn't all that uncommon, the presence of Chinese characters on every infected machine was a dead giveaway. Not exactly something I'd ever seen from a country more historically known for installing local keyloggers to steal WoW accounts.

    But or a good hour or two, I was getting my ass handed to me, and I had to completely disconnect the building from the WAN. In addition, our AV (very big-name corporate AV firm), didn't do shit on it. After the update I had to submit samples to the AV company to get a permanent patch upstream.

    --
    If you're half as beautiful naked, you'd be 4 times as beautiful with twice as many clothes on.
    1. Re:Pretty cool stuff, actually by anubi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeh, although its the "criminal" who does these things... criminals exist - and we should know that by now.

      Criminal activity, like fire and corrosion, has existed for as long as we have been here on earth. We should know by now how to intelligently mitigate the ill effects.

      Its dangerous not to understand fire and light one. Its dangerous to expose your machine to the internet and not know exactly what its doing.

      Your experience mirrors exactly what I studied at an internet security class...

      "The iframe contained javascript designed to capture passwords from gmail and other public websites, in essence a browser-based keylogger.
      I have been fussing and fuming immensely at internet businesses - especially the financial sector - about the lunacy of having javascript or any other scripting language on a site where personal info is handled. I tell them I consider it "pornsite programming" and has NO business on a legitimate business site.

      It is the rootkit/keylogger which is my prime fear. And I know I have left the door wide open when I visit a site where I accept their scripts to run in my machine. I am then wide open for hostile redirection, "drive-by" downloads, and phishing.

      The main problem I face is the business people I have to talk to are multimillionaires who may know how to promote an online brokerage, but don't know squat about internet security. Yes. The big-name guys are the worst.

      They hire programmers who are far better at making the executive think they are worth a salary than they are about programming. They will do stupid things online like using javascript links instead of simple HTML links to force us to enable scripting. And use crazy things like pop-ups when our browsers have no problem opening up another window in an HTML link.

      I feel any financial webmaster who forces javascript on his customers is just about as idiotic as a bank clerk who writes the combination of the safe on the safe, and leaves the key to the bank under the doormat. Its a sure sign that the webmaster has found a boss who hasn't the foggiest concern about security on the internet.

      I have had to leave several stockbrokers because of this issue.

      I wonder how anyone would hire such ignorance of internet security in a position where he is dealing with money and sensitive information. My only conclusion was that those doing the hiring were just as ignorant, and had no business handling other people's money. My guess is that he probably played a nice game of golf or maybe looked pretty in a suit, and he was paid so much that people will not verify his technical expertise.

      I see Javascript on a bank? Geez, put my money in a shoebox and leave it under the bush. Oh yes, be sure to have me agree the EULA which denies any responsibility on their part. Gotta be businesslike, ya know. Its part of that thing called TRUST, meaning I am to HOPE I don't get nailed by a criminal while submitting to their demand that I use risky technologies for their convenience.

      I find it very scary when I am held hostage to enforced ignorance ( IP law ) of how my stuff works. It could be as simple as a farmer seeing his corn field on fire, yet not being allowed to know that if he turned his irrigation system on, it would put it out.

      If we are so anxious to legally protect IP, then also make the purveyor of said protected IP legally responsible for what it does, just as a parent is responsible for what his kids do, and we will see virus vulnerabilities plummet.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  5. It will be short lived by JRHelgeson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This subject is worthy of a book, however, I'll try to convey some level 5 thoughts and hopefully it'll make sense:

    The Chinese government will reign in the criminal elements. They can't afford them damaging their economy. There is too much business to be done in order to keep their economy afloat that if we threatened to cut their internet access, they would go out and put the criminals in prison for life.

    China has bred themselves into a crisis. With their 1 child per couple law that has been in effect for decades, they now have 1 child that is supporting 2 parents who supports 4 granparents as they all move into retirement age. This is a monumental economic problem and is the reason why their economic policy is evolving at a rate that far outpaces the political evolution. External influences are what are changing the Chinese government, causing them to adopt rule sets and make changes that would never come internally.

    Example: SARS...

    People started flying out of China with this illness (SARS). Communist China denied the problem even existed. The World Health Organization stepped in and grounded all flights departing from specific regions of China, causing a panic in the Business world supporting the Chinese economy. This forced China to recognize the problem and adopt new information sharing rules whereby we now know about the Asian Bird Fru YEARS before it becomes a global pandemic (if it ever does). This is an external change that never would have come internally from their own country.

    China monitors their internet very closely, they know who the criminals are. They will be shut down soon because to let them continue would 1) be an embarassment to China, and 2) could have disasterous economic consequences.

    As a simple reference: The United States currently consumes 40 Quadrillion BTU's of energy per year from all sources. China consumes 7 QBTU and needs to get to 14 QBTU within the next 10 years in order to keep their economy from collapsing. They have a lot of work to do and they're not going to let malware authors derail their country. If they get derailed, they're going to be headed in the same direction as the Soviet Union. China will do anything to prevent that from happening, including invading their neighbors. China is a nation of pride, there is no way they're going to let their nation fail.

    When the Soviet Union collapsed, the citizens didn't much care because at least the Vodka was still cheap!

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
    1. Re:It will be short lived by BillyGee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many, if not most, of the "citizens" of the Soviet Union didn't care because the collapse was something they had been hoping for ever since Russia occupied their countries. It meant they could actually buy food in stores, cross the border and not have to support the ethnic russian population. Nevermind the fact that the Soviet Union made Hitler seem relatively harmless considering the number of people murdered or sent to prison camps.

  6. Slashdot crowd is safe! by mi · · Score: 2, Funny

    to the point where some unlucky persons may be getting some every day.

    That's not us. For better or worse...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  7. Re:Catching up? by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...because for the most part its all in chinese.

    That's a tough one to notice, eh? Ads in Chinese... "I don't understand this shit, maybe it's free pr0n!"

    Adware is adware, rootkits are rootkits... I don't care what language they're in - English, Chinese, Swahili or even Basic.

    They're annoying all the same.

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  8. That's still local. by khasim · · Score: 3, Informative

    The MAC address and ARP broadcasts are only used for local delivery. Some machine on that local segment had to have already been cracked.

    There was a cracked machine sitting inside your firewall and broadcasting on your internal network.

    How it was cracked is the first issue.

    Using it as a proxy is just weird. It would be more efficient and effective to use it to scan other machines to see if they're vulnerable and to run attacks on your administrator passwords.

    Better yet, upload the BIOS info and see if a rootkit can be installed on the motherboard.

    It is a strange attack because it doesn't match any of the standard reasons for attacking.

    #1. Bandwidth - this for for spam and DDoS attacks.
          1a. Crack one machine and upload the address book and anything that appears to be an email address so infected emails can be sent to those addresses.
          1b. Crack one machine and scan that range to see if any other machines are vulnerable.

    #2. Information - compromise one machine / router / whatever and use that to attack important internal machines via worms or password attacks.

    The attack you describe is just ... weird. Why attempt to compromise multiple workstations via an outside site? That is too easily noticed. Suddenly all of your workstations are hitting this one site? That's a huge flag in the logs. Even if you hadn't noticed it on the workstations.

    And they wouldn't get any more bandwidth from the attack (case #1) nor would they get information that wasn't more easily available (and less noticeable) via other routes (case #2).

    1. Re:That's still local. by shrapnull · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not going to criticize what it COULD have done. Obviously, there are some machines on that portion of the network that are not sufficiently hardened and that will be dealt with. The delivery mechanism of the malware had to be an internal user with overblown desktop privs, but having inhereted this 5,000 node network 4 months ago that's an issue we're addressing with the AD and antivirus rollout.

      As to what would make sense for them to hack, I think it would make MORE sense for them to try to capture web-based logins such as gmail, et al, since those would be easier for them to access then actually cracking through a Cisco ASA or a pix and getting access to a machine with nothing more then MS Office and a desktop. At least those are tangible hacks that can be compromised instantly regardless of where in the world the attack originated.

      It was a very weird attack. My nUbuntu laptop was affected by the iframe which was one of the instant alerts that this had to do with MAC or IP hijacking rather then just a simple virus like a worm. The network logs were immediately noticed, but how many small networks without sysops do you think will be able so sufficiently notice and protect against this. This is going to be a very successful attack, and it's the first Chinese attack I have ever seen to this measure.

      --
      If you're half as beautiful naked, you'd be 4 times as beautiful with twice as many clothes on.
    2. Re:That's still local. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You just don't get it. With a MAC address attack, as long as any machine on the local network is compromised, they control all traffic on that network. You have to resort to non-networked methods of fixing machines. Additionally, you can have that one machine process things locally to minimize the much more likely to be noticed internet traffic. After scraping some information, let the arp poisoning expire and they can sit undetected for a long time until they decide to wake up again.

      As long as any machine on the entire internet is compromised they can redirect machines to proxy through it to control vast networks of machines. Make the worm self modifying to keep track of a list of compromised machines with open internet access and you have a really tough to beat worm.

      These attacks are targeted at businesses not individual users. They don't want your email addresses. They don't want it for DoDDs attacks. They want to sit there and listen for banking information or insider information for stock market manipulation or to sell trade secrets. Spam and DoS are kid stuff. This is done by the big boys.

  9. Oh hmm. by romland · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to the point where some unlucky persons may be getting some every day.

    TFS makes it sound as if that is a bad thing.

    Welcome to Slashdot, I guess. :)

  10. One Child Law... by eklitzke · · Score: 3, Informative

    I mostly agree with what you had to say. The part about the one child law is not that accurate however, so I wanted to comment on it.

    China has bred themselves into a crisis. With their 1 child per couple law that has been in effect for decades, they now have 1 child that is supporting 2 parents who supports 4 granparents as they all move into retirement age. This is a monumental economic problem and is the reason why their economic policy is evolving at a rate that far outpaces the political evolution. External influences are what are changing the Chinese government, causing them to adopt rule sets and make changes that would never come internally.

    This hasn't really been in effect for as long as you think. My girlfriend and I are both 20, and her parents were both born well before the one child law. So probably the very first people born under this law have started to have children. I was also told by her family (not sure if this is 100% accurate) that the law works every other generation. So if you were a single child, you can have two children -- and they can have a single child, and their children can have two children, and so forth. In addition to all of this, it is worth mentioning that the population of China is still (slowly) growing, which indicates that the one child law isn't as strictly enforced as you might think.

    With respect to the rest of what you said, I agree with a lot of it. External influences dictate a huge amount of the national policy in the country. To even keep up the pace of growth that they have been sustaining for as long as they have shows that they are hugely more aware of international and economic policy than many people give them credit for. At the end of the day, China will do what it needs to do to keep their economy strong and safe.

    --
    #include ".signature"
  11. Re:SOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    How does one find what IP ranges Russia and China use?

    China:
    http://blackholes.us/zones/countries/cn.txt

    Russia:
    http://blackholes.us/zones/countries/ru.txt

    For iptables:
    #wget http://blackholes.us/zones/countries/cn.txt
    #wget http://blackholes.us/zones/countries/ru.txt
    #for IPRANGE in `cat cn.txt | awk '{print $2}'`; do iptables -I INPUT -s $IPRANGE -j DROP; done
    #for IPRANGE in `cat ru.txt | awk '{print $2}'`; do iptables -I INPUT -s $IPRANGE -j DROP; done