MS Security Guy Wants Vista Bugs Rated Down
jcatcw writes "Gregg Keizer reports that Michael Howard, an MS senior security program manager, says that the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) is being too conservative in its Vista vulnerability rating plans. Microsoft's own bug hunters should cut Windows Vista some slack and rate its vulnerabilities differently because of the operating system's new, baked-in defenses."
Sounds a little like Michael Howard might be "baked in". . .
You are trying to cover your own ass. Cancel or Allow?
I am officially gone from
"Built in defenses".
Yeah, right. He's been reading too much William Gibson...
Vista making microsoft became microsofter...
That Mr. Howard has yet to come to the sad realization that the rest of the Vista-using world has...
Yeah, threat rating: "waaah... security is hard!"
...Rob
The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
Obviously any Vista security bugs should be rated less severe... I mean, nobody's running that OS, right? Minimal impact!
The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
Allow or Deny?
Comment removed based on user account deletion
wake-n-bake lets all take
a look at microsoft half-baked
hit the bong and sing this song
windows got security wrong
Around we go with disclosure fud
Michael Howard please pass the bud
boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.