Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

ReactOS Revealed

Posted by kdawson on from the waiting-for-a-reaction dept.

reactosfanboy writes "DRM Hacker Alex Ionescu explained the internals of ReactOS in a recent talk. Ionescu indicates that ReactOS is nearly 100% binary and API compatible with the Windows 2003 kernel, and that they are aiming for full Vista compatibility. Ionescu attempted to demonstrate ReactOS but only succeeded in installing it after two BSoDs. This alone should make it clear that ReactOS is still not ready for prime time." In what may be a red flag for Microsoft's lawyers, ReactOS is described as "an environment identical to Windows, both visually and internally." Here are slides from Ionescu's talk (PDF), which might prove more useful than the video offered in various forms at over 450 MB.

2 of 280 comments (clear)

  1. Identical? by FunkyELF · · Score: 4, Interesting

    an environment identical to Windows, both visually and internally.
    I didn't get that from the screen shots. The text inside of cpu-z go beyond their container. The okay and cancel buttons here look as bad as 20 year old Unix, I'm thinking of CDE or Motif or whatever that is called. In fact, every single thing looks a bit off. Is that on purpose for legal reasons? ~Eric
  2. Re:Doubt microsoft would care by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wine offers a much more compelling method of migrating from Windows.

    WINE is an incomplete re-implementation of the Windows APIs, while ReactOS aims to be a complete one. I don't have any real confidence that WINE will ever work reliably for arbitrary software. It is a nice crutch for specific, common applications. It is a reasonable route to building a quick and dirty port. I don't think it will ever fill the role of a method of moving away from Windows and still running random (often proprietary or outdated) applications.

    ReactOS would still require you to be running a full separate operating system. If you wanted to do that, you could run your current Windows XP licenses in virtual machines, and just run Linux on the host, or what have you.

    That is pretty much what I am doing now, except most WinXP licenses are not portable to new hardware and such a move is often accompanied by a move to new hardware. ReactOS is likely to be more lightweight than the current version of Windows and less likely to cause headaches with licensing and registration and DRM shutting it down arbitrarily. It also would have save my company a hundred bucks a license and that adds up.

    Granted, Wine isn't entirely there yet... but neither is ReactOS.

    I actually looked at WINE and a couple of commercial WINE-based offerings and ReactOS before I chose to run WinXP in a VM. It was the most expensive solution by far (other than Windows outside a VM) but the only one that worked. In future I could see going either way, but I think the overhead from ReactOS is likely going to end up less of a consideration that the necessarily limited range of WINE.