Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Windows Vista, More Than Just a Pretty Face

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the don't-judge-a-book-by-its-bsod dept.

Nash writes "Ars Technica takes a look under the hood of Vista, discussing the need for a new API and comparing the graphics engine in Vista to that of Mac OS X. 'With Windows Vista it will be possible to implement Exposé properly-with live window updates and low system overhead. That said, it doesn't thus far look like Microsoft will be doing anything so useful as Exposé. Though the blurred glass effect is rather attractive, it's not exactly useful. Other visual effects include miniature window previews when the mouse cursor is hovered over taskbar buttons and an upgraded alt-tab device, and Flip3D.'"

4 of 381 comments (clear)

  1. Glass Effect and Screenshots by snowgirl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's kind of unfortunate that the Glass effect is transparent. If you take a screenshot of a single window, it will pick up whatever is behind the window.

    So, say you have something you don't want to show up in your screenshot, but it's behind the Glass effect. It will show up in the screenshot.

    Not normally that big of a deal, but it's kind of annoying taking a screenshot of a "single window" and picking up content from other windows.

    --
    WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  2. Gnome + Beryl by solevita · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My laptop does all the effects mentioned in the article summary and more, even though the specs of it are far below what Vista requires. And I owe it all to Ubuntu, Gnome and Beryl.

    There's no easy to find minimum required specs for Beryl, so I thought I'd just try it anyway and see what happens; I only really wanted it for Exposé anyway, so I wasn't too worried whether the rest of it worked. It works better than I had hoped and all effects work with no noticeable stress on my system.

    Ubuntu, Gnome and Beryl, more than just a pretty face. I'm very happy with it all.

  3. Re:OS X not that bad. by mackyrae · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A Windows tech asked me if I was running Vista when he saw Beryl. He tried to claim Vista could do all that stuff (cube, burning windows, Expose). Obviously, he was wrong. He was also shocked by how low my RAM usage was.

    --
    look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
  4. Agree WTF is up with I/O in Vista? by bogie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I shouldn't constantly be staring at the stupid green bar at the top of Explorer waiting for Vista to finish displaying the files in a directory. I love it when some of the photos never get thumbnails. Explorer in Xp for all of its warts is noticeably faster at displaying directories and copying data around.

    You just know there is some insane DRM checker running 50,000 a second to check to make sure that your actually allowed to view you own files.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch