Slashdot Mirror


NBC, News Corp Join to Create YouTube Clone

Brett writes "It's official: NBC Universal and News Corp have announced their plans to create a video sharing site of their own. The joint venture will features both TV and movie shows in full length, including episodes of '24,' 'My Name is Earl,' and movies like 'Borat.' The plan is to also syndicate content on other portals like MSN, MySpace, and Yahoo! It's unclear how YouTube's previous deal with NBC relates to this, but it's clear that the major players are now shunning YouTube."

10 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. Displace YouTube? by mymaxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just don't think NBC is going to be able to displace YouTube for the homemade videos. They'll probably get people to come and watch their shows though.

  2. Re:And so ends YouTube by spoondisaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not necessarily. People will still do it anyway and YouTube has more of a purpose than the mashup of TV shows. Some musicians, rather than posting their videos on their websites, are posting on YouTube and then linking directly to that from their website. There is always a need for a service where literally anyone can post anything, and much of the content is more than music videos set to Battlestar Galactica scenes.

  3. Re:And so ends YouTube by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    B.S.

    It's crap - not community driven. It misunderstands the interest in YouTube.

    YouTube is not popular because people are "snagging free stuff" that they already have on their Tivo, etc. Repackaging the TV is stupid. That is an aspect of YouTube, and the only one that this is a reaction to.

    The Corporations who are driving this "partnership" never even heard of "All your base are belong to us" - let alone understood what it means. The Internet is a social phenomenon, not just a marketing experience.

    People who've destroyed their creative thinking process in the marketing field fail to understand this.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  4. As if google didn't know by shawn443 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is this bad? This is natural. I did not expect gootube to be the end all for online video. I doubt google expected a monopoly position either. We are only seeing natural competition within this type of service.

  5. Re:Tune in to irrelevance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, it's ironically the Internet articles that don't get it. The company not only didn't refer to it as a competitor to youtube but actually played down such comparisons. I think this is brilliant if you think of it from the perspective of the thing itself, and not pretending that it's competing with something that is inherently different.

  6. Re:And so ends YouTube by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um...........

    You really think the people in charge of this little venture know that 'mashup' is a word that sometimes doesn't involve food?

    Be serious. This isn't going to end YouTube. This might cause a little healthy competition. Honestly, I'm kinda disappointed because YouTube isn't clusterf*d with video ads all the time, and this will be. There's little chance you'll get to watch short clips of pieces of the Daily Show. You'll get to watch the entire thing, and commercials will come with. Lame? Yeah, kinda.

    And my bet is their solution will be DRM enhanced. Another little bit of lame.

  7. Re:If you build it they will come by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Three words:

    GO DOT COM

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  8. If you can't beat 'em... by themushroom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...join 'em.

    Hey, I think it's great that NBC would want to get into the video offerings business. Reason why people post copyrighted material to YouTube is so it will be available. NBC has already been making overtures in that direction with some of their shows (like the standup routines from 'Last Comic Standing' S5) and Fox has performances from 'American Idol' on their site, ergo you don't have to go to find a Torrent or browse YouTube et aliis to see what you missed.

    And for that reason, NBC's assimilating seems a smarter move than Viacom's bitching, IMHO.

  9. That's funny by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Almost every discussion about music, movies or TV shows here has countless replies saying "But the industry doesn't GET IT, man!! Their business model is OUTDATED!! If they gave me this content for cheap with no DRM I wouldn't have to pirate it!!"

    So here comes an announcement that they'll be putting content online for FREE - and they'll be the ones making the money from the ads, not youtube, which seems only fair to me - and again I see replies of "but the industry doesn't GET IT!!". I think that's kinda funny.

    This site could go either way, but to me it's the first indication that they might be starting to "get it".

    --
    ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    1. Re:That's funny by daigu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I am interested in particular show and I know where it is available, then its one thing to "get it".

      However, the real trick of "getting it" is making it available as part of an aggregate service so people can look for topics - sailing, science fiction or whatever without having to think of all the different shows and providers that have something you might be interested in. Sure, you can go to the New York Times site. You can aggregate sites you are typically interested in using an RSS feed. But a big piece of the value chain for people looking for content will be the ability to go to one place and know you are searching everything that is available by topic - you can't get that in a stand alone service. You can do it by providing people with standards - but that means "getting it" on yet another level.

      There is a long way to go yet.