Bot Infestations Reach Nearly 1.2M
mengel writes "According to the folks at SecurityFocus the number of bot-infested systems has surged to nearly 1.2 million. This after a
big drop in December when lots of people replaced/upgraded
systems. Time to upgrade your spam filtering software, the onslaught is coming."
I work for a small ISP and that's exactly what we do. You get two strikes. First is a warning to clean up your machine and put on antivirus software. Next time, we kick you off the network and terminate your account. Problem totally solved. We've had two people get the first warning. None kicked yet.
I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
The IP address spread is fairly simple to understand. If you have 100,000 zombie PCs with 100,000 IP addresses, then clearly you can send 100,000 pieces of spam without ever using the same IP address twice. That makes the honeypot database of greylisting useless, since I rely on waiting to see a given IP address send email to a known "bogus" email address to correctly identify that IP address as a spammer (in the short term, at least).
That isn't greylisting at all (though it is useful against spam).
Greylisting is giving a "new" incoming SMTP connection a 400-series error message the first time they try to send email to you. A 400-series error means a temporary problem - please try again. When they try a second time they try to send email, you accept.
Since all legitimate email servers will retry when they get a 400-series error, a legitimate message will go through, at a cost of a time delay.
However, most spammers don't bother retrying (although some do), so you can block a lot of spam with greylisting, with very little bandwidth or CPU cost.