Slashdot Mirror


Voters Vote Yes, County Says No

Khyber writes in with a story from Montana, where residents of Missoula County voted in a referendum intended to advise county law-enforcement types to treat marijuana offenses as low-profile. The referendum would not have changed any laws, but was advisory only. After voters approved it, county commissioners overturned it by a 2-to-1 vote. They were swayed by the argument of the county attorney, who had a "gut feeling" that Missoula's electorate had misinterpreted the ballot language. The move has resulted in a flood of disaffection among voters, especially young voters. "Is there even a point to voting any more if the will of the people can so easily be subverted by two people?" one voter posted on a comment blog.

4 of 645 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    tis a problem with heavy pot smokers, they tend to forget things ;-)

  2. No, just optimizing for typical /. readers :-) by Eternal+Vigilance · · Score: 5, Funny

    That node was flagged by the new /. content analyzer as unreachable and optimized out.

    Fascinating technology, really. Here's a link to how they do it:

  3. Re:Here goes my karma, I guess by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think that it certainly matters more to many of us here than whether or not some dinosaurs dug burrows.

  4. Re:Here goes my karma, I guess by istartedi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, you see it's like... oh hold on, I have to step away from the computer, I'm laughing so hard... OK, it's like don't worry about your karma because you see... hold on... I need to get some more of these cookies. These cookies are awesome and all of the sudden I just can't seem to get enough of... hold on, I think I'm going to have another laughing fit... umm... you see, oh, something about some "news for nerds" question. Dude, just chill out. Haven't you ever looked up at the stars and thought, that light is touching my face and it was touching a start? So thats why it's news for nerds.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?