Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Microsoft to Buy DoubleClick?

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the double-or-nuthin dept.

roscoetoon writes to tell us Bloomberg is reporting that Microsoft is in talks to buy DoubleClick. Seen as a move to compete against the Google advertising engine Double Click owners Hellman & Friedman are seeking a $2 billion payday. "The purchase would give Microsoft tools to battle Google Inc. for ads that appear on Web sites. DoubleClick works with advertisers to create online campaigns, such as streaming video clips to promote New Line Cinema's movie "The Number 23." The New York-based company's Dart technology monitors the performance of Internet ads for marketing companies."

4 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. Seriously, who doesn't filter DoubleClick? by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you use Firefox, snag Adblock Plus and the Filterset.G Updater. If you're using Internet Destr-- Er, I mean Internet Explorer, woe is you, but at least snag the Google Toolbar, which I think blocks DoubleClick ads.

    1. Re:Seriously, who doesn't filter DoubleClick? by ZiZ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or you could use the EasyList and EasyElement filter subscriptions with Adblock Plus - no extra extension needed, and they're simpler and easier to maintain (and, at least subjectively, faster) than the Filterset.G is. I was a huge fan of Filterset.G for a long time, but I've been even happier with Easy*.

      --
      This flies in the face of science.
  2. Re:Just one more reason for people to hate MS by daeg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Which makes them a perfect advertiser in my books. They are easy to block. Their ad spaces on client websites generally collapse very neatly, too.

    That said, I wonder what Microsoft could bring to DoubleClick. I'd hate to see Microsoft add various "stealth" techniques that other advertisers use, e.g., frequently rotating hostnames, formats, etc.

    If customers are going to block your ads, at least make it easy. They're going to do it either way. The easier you make it, the more those people will remain on those websites, which at least brings you minimal value as an advertiser. When I worked in media, we typically gave clients two different sets of stats for this exact purpose. You don't disclose your traffic count based on your advertising banners/etc, instead you tell them your server stats traffic, which is always higher. Of course, you're selling impressions/clicks/referrals, so the advertiser doesn't actually care if the site users are blocking their ad as long as they get what they paid for. The website, of course, may or may not care, depending on who they are.

  3. Re:Yawn by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Informative

    I already block them in my hosts file. This changes nothing.

    If you're using Windows and blocked Microsoft sites on your hosts file, Windows will ignore it and still connect to them. If they get DoubleClick, I wont be surprised if the same thing happens with their servers.