Slashdot Mirror
Intel Next-Gen CPU Has Memory Controller and GPU
Many readers wrote in with news of Intel's revelations yesterday about its upcoming Penryn and Nehalem cores. Information has been trickling out about Penryn, but the big news concerns Nehalem — the "tock" to Penryn's "tick." Nehalem will be a scalable architecture with some products having on-board memory controller, "on-package" GPU, and up to 16 threads per chip. From Ars Technica's coverage: "...Intel's Pat Gelsinger also made a number of high-level disclosures about the successor to Penryn, the 45nm Nehalem core. Unlike Penryn, which is a shrink/derivative of Core 2 Duo (Merom), Nehalem is architected from the ground up for 45nm. This is a major new design, and Gelsinger revealed some truly tantalizing details about it. Nehalem has its roots in the four-issue Core 2 Duo architecture, but the direction that it will take Intel is apparent in Gelsinger's insistence that, 'we view Nehalem as the first true dynamically scalable microarchitecture.' What Gelsinger means by this is that Nehalem is not only designed to take Intel up to eight cores on a single die, but those cores are meant to be mixed and matched with varied amounts of cache and different features in order to produce processors that are tailored to specific market segments." More details, including Intel's slideware, appear at PC Perspectives and HotHardware.
I do. I feel that AMD should stop beating itself and get back to beating Intel!
No, seriously, though. I'm holding out on the hope that AMD's licensing of ZRAM will be able to keep them in the game.
110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
I agree. Despite of the fact of AMD market share growing in the past 3 years, the most recent products coming from AMD are headed to beat the AMD ones, unless AMD takes a shift in the current direction and starts to follow AMD example. Nowadays, when I order my processors from my retailer, I always ask for AMD first, and only if the AMD price is significantly lower, I order AMD. I remember back in the days when you could only buy AMD processors, while now you can choose between AMD and AMD (and some other minor producers), isn't competition marvelous?
From your truly,
Marklar
I can't wait for the Frodo and Samwise chips
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Looks like you've got one of those new computers that runs faster based on originality. I bet those Lian Li cases really make it scream then!
Bah, :)
You don't need an advanced GUI and expensive GPU to to do wobble effects. Every time the guy in the next cubicle degaussed his computer monitor, *EVERY* window on my desktop would wobble, even the taskbar. To avoid any damage to my monitor, I'd degauss my monitor
Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
When I was your age, we used floppy disks as swap space.
:P (try THAT on for size!)
N 0C+N0CC+D+E8D+8C+4P2D+F+A2G+2F+2E2EG+2G+2F+EC+P4"
When I was your age, we overclocked our floppy drives.
When I was your age, memory upgrades came with a soldering iron and a hand-written instruction sheet.
When I was your age, L1 cache was just a really long wire loop with high capacitance.
When I was your age, computers booted in about 2/10ths of a second.
When I was your age, Compuserve was the world's biggest dial-up network
When I was your age, we didn't let teenagers post crap on the internets, we beat them into discipline with a belt and sent them off to bible school!
When I was your age, music piracy was a big problem: PLAY "T240MNO2 G+N0C+N0CC+D+C+P2P4D+F+EP2P4F+G+F+EP2P4G+F+EC+CG+
When I was your age, there was still money to be made in the computer industry.
-Billco, Fnarg.com
"let's".
Yup.
"AMD has released their next generation of slow crap. With Intel breathing down their neck, can they survive for even the next few hours with such horrible products?"
vs
"Intel may release a product in the next 2-7 years. Can AMD survive?"