Slashdot Mirror


Serenity Trounces Star Wars

DogBotherer writes "The BBC is reporting that the film Serenity has been voted the number-one Sci Fi film of all time. Serenity is a followup to the series Firefly. The 2005 film beat out Star Wars better than two-to-one for the top honors. This result came in a poll of 3000 readers of SFX magazine.

5 of 710 comments (clear)

  1. Star Wars is Sci-fi by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 4, Informative

    Star Wars is fantasy, not science fiction.

    Science fiction and fantasy are both speculative fiction sub-genres.

    Science fiction is mostly defined by its setting and subject matter: outer space, aliens, time travel, imaginary technology, etc. Star Wars is certainly science fiction, even though it crosses the boundary a little with what might be considered magic (as does Dune). What Star Wars is not is hard sf, a sub-genre of science fiction in which the plot itself is based on plausible scientific theory.

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  2. I would by hummassa · · Score: 5, Informative

    (put my waging money on it)
    People who did not see Firefly tend to forget that it already had cult status and recognition... Browncoats bought so many Firefly DVDs that they convinced Fox (or whomever) to produce Serenity in the first place!

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  3. Re:Come on by Nimey · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought the second worst sin committed was killing off certain people needlessly.


    No. There were Real Life reasons for killing Book and Wash. Book's actor wanted out of acting to do political activism full-time, and Wash's actor had other acting commitments.
    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  4. Re:Be sure to watch Firefly THEN Serenity! by Se7enLC · · Score: 3, Informative

    I agree 100%

    I had never seen Firefly, but I had a lot of friends who were fans of it. We all saw Serenity, and while it was a decent movie, if you asked me a week later what I thought of it, I wouldn't have even been able to recall what it was about.

    Recently, I was convinced to sit down and watch all of firefly. I really enjoyed it. Then I watched Serenity again. It was like I was watching a completely different movie!

    Seeing the movie by itself, you don't really get attached to the characters like you do in the TV show. [Spoiler] When Wash and Shepherd die, you don't really feel badly about that in the movie, because you didn't really know them. Shepherd especially, he wasn't much more than a background character.[/Spoiler]

  5. Re:You are all avoiding the real question by wiggles · · Score: 4, Informative

    Battle Star Galatica (even that raping-of-my-childhood bastard new series)


    See, that's why I avoided the new BSG series for two seasons before I got on board with it. But then, once I got it through my head that it has nothing to do with the series from the 70's, the show instantly became enjoyable. All you have to do is not compare the two series, realize that the new series is completely separate from the old series, and you're in business. Kinda like the Batman series of movies from the late 80's/90's and the new Batman Begins series, or like Star Trek vs. TNG -- just reboot the part of your brain that pays attention to BSG, or create a separate partition for it, and you're good to go.

    Pity that doesn't work for Star Wars.