Slashdot Mirror


Large Caves Found on the Surface of Mars

David DelMonte writes "Space.com is reporting on the discovery of seven dark spots near the Equator on Mars. The thinking is that these are cave openings. The openings are the size of football fields, and one of them is thought to extend approximately 400 feet below the surface.'The researchers hope the discovery will lead to more focused spelunking on Mars. "Caves on Mars could become habitats for future explorers or could be the only structures that preserve evidence of past or present microbial life ," said Glenn Cushing of Northern Arizona University, who first spotted the black areas in the photographs.'"

22 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Wait, what? by susano_otter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why does the article keep switching back and forth between "we think they might be caves" and "we're certain they really are caves"? Let me know when they've made up their minds about whether or not they've made up their minds, and I'll start caring about these (possible) caves.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:Wait, what? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Arne Saknussemm; where are you now that we need you?

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  2. Surprise? by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We know Venus has mountains and valleys. We know Mars has mountains and valleys.

    Should be at all surprised to find caves on Mars?

    I thought we already believed that all solid planets had plate activity like Earth, that formed the mountains and valleys. Aren't caves a natural extension of that thought process?

    I thought this was a given.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see the word "surprising" anywhere in the article. You do realize there's a difference between predicting something and confirming it, right?

    2. Re:Surprise? by Cedric+Tsui · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mars does not have plate activity like earth.

      This is why Mars has larger mountains and deeper valleys than earth, because the one plate does not move, and that mountain on the top of the hotspot never moved away from the source of its growth.

    3. Re:Surprise? by thelexx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speculation, no matter how informed and certain, is never as good as proof.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    4. Re:Surprise? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought we already believed that all solid planets had plate activity like Earth, that formed the mountains and valleys. Aren't caves a natural extension of that thought process?
      Not necessarily. Most caves on earth are not caused by pyroclastic flow, but rather by (acidic) flowing water dissolving calcite in limestone.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  3. Ack Ack Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We come in peace!

    Ack Ack Ack! Ack Ack ACKACK!

    Do not run! We are your friends!

  4. They're not caves... by brennanw · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... they're where the Martians store all their canal-boats till next thaw.

    --
    Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
  5. No matter how much changes... by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Caves on Mars could become habitats for future explorers...

    Does anyone else find it slightly amusing that as humans move out into space we may yet again end up living in caves?

    --

    What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    1. Re:No matter how much changes... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Informative
      > Does anyone else find it slightly amusing that as humans move out into space we may yet again end up living in caves?

      It's no more interesting than the fact that people on Mars will probably wear shoes, just like upper paleolithic humans. In fact, less interesting because caves have never played a significant role in human habitation. Humans have lived all over the world, but how many of those places do you think have caves?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  6. caves a good spot to land by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mars has no global magnetic field to deflect solar radiation which means that when humans go there they will be exposed to alot of deadly radiation- if we want to stay on mars we need a place that is safe- caves are one such place. they shield agaisnt radiation and make it easier to build habitats. this discovery could allow humans to colonize mars.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:caves a good spot to land by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      We live in a mobile home. It's like a cave, with wheels. You can go places. Except we never went anywhere.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. Black Areas by AeroIllini · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...said Glenn Cushing of Northern Arizona University, who first spotted the black areas in the photographs. "Uh oh, looks like someone smudged the photo."

    *rubs finger on photo*

    "Hmm. Guess they're caves, then."
    --
    For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  8. 2001 A space odyssey by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Part of the symbolism of the space baby at the end of the movie is that people are masters of the Earth, but we're infants in space. We're vulnerable, and have to learn and practice even simple things like moving from one end of the spacecraft to the other in a spacesuit. We wear diapers up there.

    If we're going to be on Mars, it is therefore fitting that we should be cavemen. That's where we started, and that's where we will start again.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:2001 A space odyssey by VWJedi · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's hard to believe that such an insightful statement could come from a "Profane MuthaFucka".

  9. WHAT? by corifornia · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holes? In the ground?

    --
    crap.
  10. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't confuse a propaganda campaign by NASA with what scientists actually think. Nobody working in the field is the least surprised by caves on Mars. But NASA need to make press releases and hype them up a bit. And anyway, caves on Mars are cool.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  11. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by profplump · · Score: 3, Interesting

    we thought that Earth was the center of the universe, that the sun revolved around Earth

    I really wish people would stop telling these lies. The Earth *is* the center of the universe, and the sun *does* revolve around the Earth. If you're talking about other planets or galaxies it's not necessary a handy reference point, but there's no technical reason that you can't define Earth as the origin in any coordinate system. Similarly it's just as accurate to say that the sun revolves around Earth as it is to say that Earth revolves around the sun; the sun and Earth revolve around each other, and anything more specific only expresses a frame a reference, not a technical truth.

    The only part people ever got wrong was the the movement of other planets; there were models that showed other planets in revolution around Earth, and those were inaccurate (and quickly discovered to be so as soon as the technology existed to measure the inaccuracies in the predicted orbits of the planets). But in a time before access to high-quality optics it's not entirely unreasonable to suppose that distant non-star objects you observe behave in the same way as the sun and the moon -- that they also revolve around the Earth.

    I won't argue the "earth was flat" point (much) for the moment, as there were at least some people at some point in history who believed that. Not many people who actually studied the subject, at least not since some year that ended with "BC", but there were some people in the Early Middle Ages who argued for a flat-earth model, and their belief was wrong, so it's a better point than the first two, even if it's based on a misunderstanding of history.

    And while religion does may bad (fight about stupid things) and good things (organize society in the absence of stable political powers), they can't be blamed for your misunderstanding of astronomy or history, so maybe you should lay off.

  12. There are several ways caves form... by Like2Byte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are solutional caves - caves formed by water - and there are lava-tube caves - caves (lava tubes, actually) formed by molten rock. When molten lava cools around other hotter lava, the hotter lava travels around the cooler, more solid, lava and sometimes drains out enough to create a pocket of, well, emptiness. Often times, lava tubes are not discovered until the ground gives way and opens into a pit to access the tube. Hawaii has lots of Lava tubes as do many areas near volcanoes.

    On Earth, the ground breaks up due to water-action and other biological means (animals, bacteria, humans, etc...). I'm sure on Mars there's another method to break open a lava tube...sandblasting due to a large storm on Mars' surface and the occasional meteorite.

    It's no surprise that Mars has caves - it makes sense. Whether or not those caves are solutional is what is important here.

  13. Re:spelunking by mad.frog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, "spelunking" isn't really used in that way (at least in the USA) by people who regularly explore caves; "caving" is the preferred term.

    For reasons that aren't completely clear, "spelunker" has come to mean "person who goes in caves without proper equipment or training" among American cavers. (At caving conventions, you'll see bumper stickers that read "Cavers Rescue Spelunkers".)

    See Wikipedia for more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caving

    For more info in general (at least on USA caving), check out the website of the National Speleological Society: http://www.caves.org/

    or the chat forum, http://www.cavechat.org/

  14. Re:We're not as unique as everyone thinks... by escher · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No problem. You shoot a nuke down a bug hole, you got a lot of dead bugs.