Slashdot Mirror


The Virtual Teacher

Roland Piquepaille writes "Researchers from Illinois and Florida are developing a networking system which will create virtual representations of real people to improve our knowledge. They will use artificial intelligence and natural language processing software to enable us to interact with these avatars. The goal of the project, sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF), is to give us the possibility to interact with these virtual representations as if they were the actual person, complete with the ability to understand and answer questions. We should see the results at the beginning of 2008 — if the researchers succeed."

6 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. tag: boycottroland by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative

    P.S. The submitter's name seems familiar. Where have I heard it before?

    Roland submits dozens upon dozens of stories to Slashdot. "Vacuous" is pretty accurate; I've repeatedly heard Slashdotters ask for the ability to filter his crap like we used to be able to filter Jon Katz.

    The primary difference is that while Katz was batshit insane and overimpressed with himself, Roland simply states the obvious and inane in his "article", and then submits it to slashdot. He regularly does little more than quote sections of the article and supply obvious commentary...and watches the hit counts roll in.

    There are two remarkable facts: one, that there isn't better content in the submission queue, and two: I don't think I've ever seen comments posted supporting him. Hilariously, on the rare occasion he does post, he's moderated down so fast, he must be on the level of the GNAA people in terms of Karma.

    Since hits support Roland, I'd suggest slashdotters tag his stuff "boycottroland"

  2. Re:Why does everyone hate Roland Piquepaille? by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know that a lot of people here at Slashdot have a burning hatred for Roland Piquepaille. But I find it confusing. The articles he submits are always very interesting, especially for those of us interested in science. They're the epitome of "news for nerds".

    The problem is that he submits interesting articles which are linked via his blog. So we read a blog story about a blog story about something interesting.

    He forces slashdotters to go through his site (racking up hits and advertising dollars) to read the actual interesting content...

  3. Re:Why does everyone hate Roland Piquepaille? by CmdrPorno · · Score: 2, Informative

    He used to summarize the articles on his blog, and then submit the link to his blog on Slashdot instead of linking to the original article, which netted him ad dollars every time someone visited. Now, he submits links to the original article, but still gets a link back to his blog (if you click on his name). Most Slashdotters still hold a grudge against him for his past actions, which is understandable since he was essentially spamming.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  4. tag: pigpile by cswiii · · Score: 2, Informative

    seen that one before too.

  5. Automated post: FA void of anything new or useful by viking80 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is an automated comment generated by a grease monkey script. If you agree that this is posted by a blog whore, or if you do not want to read any future articles with no useful or new content, you can gray out all Roland Piquepaille articles with this script:

    http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/5735/

    Enjoy!

    The part that automatically posts this information is not included.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
  6. Re:Why does everyone hate Roland Piquepaille? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Now, he submits links to the original article, but still gets a link back to his blog (if you click on his name). Most Slashdotters still hold a grudge against him for his past actions, which is understandable since he was essentially spamming.

    Actually, the zdnet article he linked to is a blog that Roland writes for zdnet. So, he is still linking to his spam. Unfortunately, zdnet seems to think that Roland is providing a useful service, just like Taco does. I was sort of hoping Roland would go away, and he is only becoming more popular.